Monday, 24 January 2011

Digital Photo - lens cleaner, sd cards


With the prices of DSLRs and mirrorless compacts edging closer toward the 400 dollar mark, the market for compact digital cameras is not as profitable as it once was. Manufacturers struggle to find every possible way to reduce production cost to bring the retail prices of these little imagers as low as possible while maintaining their usability as an actual digital camera.



It would have been impossible to imagine a model like the DSC-W530, having a 14.1 sensor, usable high ISO sensitivities, 4x optical zoom with Carl-Zeiss optics to sell for anything less than 400 dollars just 5 years ago.



With compact digital cameras becoming obsolete as soon as they are released, Sony has attempted once again to maintain its position as a serious point-and-shoot maker since their Mavica days.



The W530, along with all of Sony's most recent W series, stands somewhere between Sony's entry level models and their somewhat advanced but expensive "luxury" models. Under the current W series line-up, Sony has the W510, W520, W530, W550, W570, WX5 and WX7.



For the past few years, Sony has been creating one ultimate point-and-shoot for each one of their W, HX and T series, stripping away certain premium features as they go down the price tags to finally arrive at some insanely cheap model made out of painted plastic for each one of those series.



So for the price of just over 100 dollars, Sony was able to retain some of the more important features from their most expensive W model, the WX7 on the DSC-W530, and they are:



1) Usable high ISO sensitivities at 1600 and 3200. Colors look a bit flat and the images look processed at these settings, but at least the images are usable for smaller prints (at a pinch, up to around A4(8R) sizes). Please bear in mind that this is after all a point-and-shoot and not a mirrorless or DSLR with APS-C sized sensors, so I'm applying a very different standard here when rating the high ISO output of this camera.



2) Useful, good quality 4X Carl Zeiss optics and fast focus lock.



3) Outdoor daylight scenes from ISO 80 to 800 are simply breathtaking, with sharp edges, deep depth-of-field (DOF), strong contrast and saturated colors, making this a great group picture camera (think family portraits at picnics etc). Although dynamic range (the total number of levels that can be captured from the darkest point to the brightest point of an image, without details getting clipped) is very limited. So beware of backlit scenes, and always point the camera in the same direction as the sun (the sun must be behind you) so your subjects are lit up as brightly as the background.



4) Very elegant semi-metal chassis with brushed aluminum on the front.



5) Extremely thin profile with the extra small battery, weightlessness: this camera will most likely be able to sneak into a concert without you having to convince the bouncers that you are carrying a bar of soap in your pocket.



6) Generously sized 2.7" LCD screen with plenty of light under room lighting, just barely viewable under very bright sunlight.



7) VGA video recording with sound and Sweep Panorama.



8) Uses both Sony Memory Stick and the very afforadable SD cards (Up to SDXC), although this feature is nothing new but it's worth mentioning.



However, the wafer-thin battery has very limited operation charge capacity, and the camera seems to be missing a few traditional controls such as creative mode selection (color, b&w, sepia, etc) and a "mode" dial to give you direct access to preset photographic parameters. Some basic manual controls (like those found on the W300) over the camera's shutter speed and aperture were of course also missing, and due to the size of the camera, it is being operated and controlled by only a handful of buttons.



And here's a list of things that I did not like about this camera:



1) A Sony processor instead of a Bionz processor, although I personally do not think the Bionz processor is that great other than providing faster image processing. The Sony image processor for the W530 seems to be providing the same quality of reduction for high ISO shots as Sony's Bionz processor.



2) No sports mode (may also explain the slower than average maximum shutter speed of just 1/1500 sec). Difficult to freeze moving objects when needed.



3) No USB charging (Sony never had them though).



4) Super slow continuous burst. At 1 frame per second, Sony might as well remove this feature altogether.



5) No zooming during movie recording.



But other than the few gripes above, I find myself enjoying the use of this camera completely. The camera is small, very light and looks really good up close and shoots half decent pictures under most conditions. The W530 also comes with a USB / Video connector (the video cable is supplied) so the user can playback their shots directly on a tv.



At the end of the day, the W530 will most likely end up in your purse, napsack or briefcase for the simple fact that they are so freakishly small and easy to carry, provide butt-kicking images with punchy colors, balanced contrast at the resolution of 14.1 megapixel even at maximum ISO and the camera simply looks too elegant to be left in a desk drawer. The camera has its limits but as far as a point-and-shoot camera goes, Sony may have hit the right spot again in terms of beauty, affordabiliy and usability with the W530. Definitely worth a test drive if you are out there shopping for a compact point-and-shoot that looks elegant but cost a little over 100 dollars. Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-W530 14.1 MP Digital Still Camera with Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar 4x Wide-Angle Optical Zoom Lens and 2.7-inch LCD (Silver)

I was able to get this model a little early, and was excited to try it out in - what better city to test a camera? - Paris. The last Sony snapshot camera I used was on a trip in 2007, and I was so dissatisfied with that camera that I sold it immediately after returning home. I was eager to see if Sony had improved their entry level cameras, especially the picture quality. I shall post some pictures to offer examples up in the product details, but these will be reduced in size for posting.



Photo quality: My initial day out indicated that they have made dramatic improvements in both quality and speed. Photos in daylight were crisp and clear in just about every shot, and any that weren't were only because I was shooting poorly on purpose to test the photos. I was also quite happy with the quality of shots in low light and indoors, which is where I noticed the most improvement over past Sony low-end offerings. There was some blurring in darker situations, of course, but for the most part the software was able to produce images that are well balanced and low grain. The 14 megapixel feature is great - there are many photos I've been able to crop and retain quality, and photos of, say, a stone sarcophagus can be zoomed in upon when viewing images later to see very good detail.



I must also mention that the camera is very good at balancing photos. It almost always produces a picture with an appropriate contrast, and only in the worst cases did the image wash out in an area. For example, a shot of Joan of Arc (the statue, not the person) in Notre Dame came out very well even with a stained glass window in the background. The stained glass was bright but distinguishable, and the detail of the stone statue was clear and well balanced. Only in extreme cases - such as a shot of a black sculpture in the Louvre with a window behind it with blaring sunlight - did the camera fail to balance the image, but these are the kind of bad photography shots one would never expect a camera to take well.



Types of Photos: Like most all snapshot photos, this camera will perform best shooting still subjects with plenty of light. Moving objects didn't tend to blur, a problem I'd had with other cheap snapshot cameras, but the response time can make getting these shots difficult. Trying to capture a motorcycle passing an old church, my 7-10 attempts were mostly good photos, but getting the moving bike in the exact spot I wanted was nearly impossible.



Features: Overall, this camera lacks in features, although for most uses I found it sufficient, and at the price I didn't expect a lot of extras. The 4x zoom is relatively fast and easy to use, and about right for this type of camera. I was surprised there was no optical zoom given the high megapixels, but I can live with cropping on the computer. The panorama mode is nifty but not that useful - it works quite well in creating a long image, which of course will cause distortion in most cases. To use this feature, you set the mode and clich the shutter. The camera will prompt you to move it from left to right, and then it will generate the image (which is always impossible to see on the display owing to its shape.) Here I would have liked some add'l features - there is just 'one size' for panorama shots - you must sweep all the way across or the image will fail. This creates many shots that will need to be messed with on the computer later, which is okay but annoying. I was also disappointed panorama doesn't work in an up and down orientation - you always have to sweep the camera in the same manner. You can, of course, hold it sideways to create a vertical panorama, but I really wanted some vertical shots tqking advantage of a larger width. Still, panoramas of the Tour Eiffel allowed me to create some fun, unique shots of the full height of the structure. There are not many other features - just some rudimentary quality settings, face detection, etc. Some might want to move up to a camera with more features, but I actually appreciated this in a point and shoot camera.



Battery life: Here the camera could use some help. Perhaps I'm spoiled by my Apple products, but digital cameras have more or less remained stuck in 2002 concerning batteries. It's annoying to have a separate charger, and battery life isn't great. Three hours of shooting...granted, constant shooting...at St Denis drained it. Given how light and small it is, I'd fully support doubling the battery size to get twice the life. I'd also love for camera makers to start to move toward USB charging options.



I'd also love it if cameras would start incorporating some onboard space. It feels like the dark ages to have to buy a card. 2 - 4 gig of onboard memory with a card slot for expansion would be nice.



Overall, a great, small, fun camera that's easy to grab and go. I wish Sony would re-imagine some of the ways digital cameras work, perhaps taking some cues from iPods, especially regarding batteries, but for the price this nifty unit is great.



Pros: Excellent pics for camera in this price range, good color balance, good in darker spaces, a few fun features



Cons: Battery life could be better, charging options, not many features or in-camera editing options - Sd Cards - Lens Cleaner'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Digital Photo - lens cleaner, sd cards lens cleaner Digital Photo - lens cleaner, sd cards

Expensive - ripoff


For anyone out there who is considering whether or not to make the leap and purchase the iPad 2, this review is for you. If you're still debating between the iPad 1 and the iPad 2 check out my review of the first generation iPad right here on Amazon to see a discussion of its strengths and weaknesses with a number of people commenting (both positively and negatively) over the past 11 months.



Let me begin by saying this upfront, I don't work for Apple, I don't own Apple Stock, and whether you buy an iPad, Xoom, a laptop or a pad of paper and pencil I don't get anything for writing this. I'm not an Apple "fanboy" although I can give credit where credit is due and lately Apple has deserved a lot of credit for some of their products.



Physical Characteristics

The iPad 2 is absurdly thin. More importantly than it's thinness is its tapered edge which feels more natural in your hand. One of the biggest complaints about the original iPad was it really wasn't tremendously comfortable to hold for long periods at a time. For a tablet device designed to be held, that's a pretty big deal. Apple really has done an amazing job of cramming everything into an even smaller space than before and the difference is really noticeable when you're holding the device. In addition to the tapered edge, Apple managed to reduce the overall weight of the iPad 2. That might not seem like a huge deal to most, especially when you consider the weight difference isn't tremendous when you're already under 2 pounds, but I spend a good part of my day holding the iPad in my hands and the weight difference is surprising by the end of the day. The first generation isn't heavy by any means, but the iPad 2 outshines it.



New and "Improved"

Apple doubled the RAM in the iPad 2 from 256MB to 512MB. What does that mean? For most casual users, probably not a whole lot. There is a performance bump that everyone will see the effects of in things like loading times for webpages that are open in the background, but 256MB was sufficient for most daily use and games. If you're planning to use your device for some of the more graphically intense games the iPad 2 does offer a better method of graphics processing that'll help deliver faster images with fewer jerky movements. If you're just playing Angry birds and reading e-mail you're not going to know the difference.



The screen is the same for all real purposes. It is technically a "new" part in that it isn't identical to the old, it's a bit thinner and more efficient, but it's the same resolution. The Glass is thinner though, and this amounts to a fair bit of the weight loss from one generation to the next. In playing with the device it seems surprising but despite feeling lighter it actually feels more sturdy in your hands. I still wouldn't suggest dropping it, but if it were to fall the iPad 2 certainly feels like it might stand a better chance to survive. Try not to drop it though.



The addition of 2 cameras was expected. Some were a bit surprised to see the first generation released without the cameras. Whether it was for a price point consideration, or a means to get people to upgrade, Apple held off until iPad 2. The cameras do a reasonable job, but they're not going to replace a dedicated digital camera, or really even the camera on your phone for most still images. The cameras do a substantially better job with video, and FaceTime is probably one of the best reasons to get the iPad 2 over the original iPad. For those who might not be familiar, FaceTime is Apple's face to face conferencing system, kind of like Skype, or if you'd rather, kind of like the Jetson's TV/Phone. With the push of a button you can be having a face to face chat with a loved one just about anywhere in the world (provided they're on a wireless network at the time). FaceTime doesn't work over 3G natively (it can be used over a wifi connection created by a 3G device however) so you're not going to be able to use it in your car anytime soon. This is probably a good thing though. It is incredibly easy to use and if you know other people with an iPad 2, iPhone 4, or Mac it's a lot of fun.



Smart Covers aren't really "smart" but they're really very useful. Not only do they provide a stylistic enhancement of the device, but they serve a practical and functional purpose of doubling as a screen protector and stand in 2 configurations. You can find them in a variety of colors and from third market suppliers, and it's a safe bet that more will be out soon to capitalize on the magnetic sensors in the iPad 2. It's unfortunate that this same feature can't somehow be retrofitted to the iPad 1, I wouldn't have thought a case would be a compelling reason to consider a product over it's competitor, but these covers are really so useful it's hard to understand why they've not been there since the beginning.



Multitasking Support

One of the biggest knocks against the iPad when first released was the lack of native multi-tasking support. Jailbreakers added the feature quickly and Apple soon realized it would be a requirement for any future device's success and released an OS update that included the feature. The iPad 2 capitalizes on that progress and takes it a step further with the increased RAM enabling more open applications to be suspended at once, and the time to open or close an application has improved as well. That said, even the first generation managed to open and close apps faster than most people would be used to on their computers, so while this is an improvement it's more akin to showing off.



Apps

One thing that Apple has clearly the advantage in for the moment is app availability. The App store has close to 70,000 iPad specific Apps, all of which will work on the iPad 2. The new cameras will undoubtedly see this list expand rapidly, as will the inclusion of a gyroscope for gaming and motion based uses. There are also a substantial number of professional applications ranging from document creation to photo editing and vector drawing. Chances are if you can dream it, there's an App for that (and if not you might want to get started on one to fill in the gap). The Android market is making a strong showing, and ultimately it'll likely be a strong competitor, for now it still has a ways to go, but any potential buyer should consider the strength of the application market before buying a tablet.



Pros:

Weight. Seriously. The minimal weight of this thing is by far the most impressive feature about it in my opinion. It seems to defy physics and logic that so much could be in such a small space working that hard for that long.



Battery Life. From full to dead my iPad 2 went just over 11 hours with the movie Robin Hood showing twice during that time, the screen at half brightness, wifi turned on, an Angry Birds marathon and a good portion of a book in ibook. That's better than a work day and that's constantly on.



Books. This is definitely a Pro, but reading itself could go either way. The great benefit to the iPad is having access to Google Books, ibook, Nook, and Kindle. This allows for some comparison shopping and price competition (although for the most part they're all usually about the same). Reading in the evenings in bed is great as the back light means you don't have to worry about keeping others awake, but the glass screen causes some glare trouble when trying to read outside or near a sunny window. If you're an avid outdoor reader the Kindle might still be your best bet.



Cons:

Still no dedicated USB support. While there is a camera add-on that allows for certain USB devices to be used there is no option for mass storage. Some of the Android Tablets allow for this and if you find yourself wanting to use your tablet as a standalone storage device this might be something to consider. The device can read from certain flash drives though, but is largely limited to photo and video files. Jailbreaks offer solutions to this, but those come with their own issues as well.



Still no dedicated SD card slot. This is troublesome on two fronts. First, if you want to import pictures from your camera you have to have an adapter which is just one more thing to carry around. Second, the lack of expansion means you're limited to what you purchase in terms of storage. I purchased a 32GB iPad last time and never filled it up completely, so for me capacity wasn't an issue. If you want to be able to have your entire movie collection with you though... you may want to consider whether the iPad 2 can meet your space requirements.



HDMI output. Really this is a Pro and a Con. The iPad does allow for HD output over HDMI but again it requires an adapter. All of these adapters are additional purchases for features that some tablets offer built in. This can be a pain, but then again if you're not likely to ever use HDMI Output then you're not paying for something you won't use.



No Flash Support. This is becoming less and less of an issue as the internet and web developers are moving away from Flash for many websites, but there are a lot still out there relying on Adobe's Flash to run properly (including a lot of web based games). Before you pick a tablet consider what kind of websites you frequent and try and determine if they are Flash driven or not. If they are you may really want to consider something from the Android offerings as it is expected that they'll have at least some Flash support.





If you're in the market for a tablet device the iPad 2 should definitely be on your short list. If you're uncertain it is always best to go and play with these things hands on first if you can. Best Buy is a good place for that, so are Verizon Stores since they have the Xoom and 3G iPad. Don't get pulled into the hype and mania that comes with an Apple release. They're exciting and new, and they're impressive enough to warrant some excitement, but it will die down and there will be other products that prove a strong competitor to the iPad 2. If you're looking for right now though, this is probably your best bet. I gave the device 4 stars, as I did the iPad 1. I did this in contemplation of the features offered by competitors that are absent from the iPad, most notably the requirement for adapters for USB/SD/HDMI. While these features are there, they aren't as convenient as in other tablets. With that in mind I firmly believe that the iPad more than makes up for this in usability, reliability, and design and in those areas far exceeds its current competitors. Apple iPad 2 MC981LL/A Tablet (64GB, Wifi, White) NEWEST MODEL - Ripoff'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Expensive - ripoff ripoff Expensive - ripoff

Recommend - vtech cordless phone, cordless telephones


I have always been a bit fussy about phones having been a phone product manager for an electronics company that is no longer in the business. This phone replaced a Verizon cordless model which seemed to be a re-badged Siemens phone. I gave that 3 stars, but should have revised it down to 2.



Anyway, this Vtech is laid out nicely. Buttons are very visible and easy to use. Comfortable handset. The sound quality is also good. Sometimes people say they can't hear me and I'm not sure if it's the mic or the fact that I moved the mic too far from my mouth. Probably the latter! I haven't checked range since I don't roam too much outside with it.



I found the menu isn't as intuitive as I would like, but a look at the owner's manual took care of that. A couple of people have actually commented about the phone saying it's a nice, slim, and slick design. I agree. Vtech DECT 6.0 Accessory Handset with Caller ID and Handset Speakerphone (LS6205)

I'm an older user whom has a hearing loss and poor eyesight. I purchased the Vtech DECT 6.0 after reading its review thinking that it would be the best fit for my situation.



I found that this phone isn't hearing aid compatible and that the display is difficult to read.

I already have a Vtech phone system that came with two handsets. We found that we needed one more handset so that we weren't sprinting across the house to get a phone call. This add-on phone was so easy to add to what we already had. It only took a minute or so to set up the new one after we charged the base unit. I highly recommend it.

Amazon cannot seem to remove the "Disappointed in Georgia" tag from an earlier review of an over the range microwave oven that was abysmal & in no way applies to this review.

These portable phones have been great. 3 of the 4 got fried in a power surge, but that's not the fault of the manufacturer, but I was so pleased that I order 3 more satellite phones to replace the 3 that got fried. Even 4-5 rooms away & over 75 feet away from the base unit they work great. I have even taken them to the southern-most part of our property (100+ feet away) & they work great, no static or other connection issues.

been very happy with this phone. It is slim and smaller than all my previous land line phones, but still it feels sturdy. It is easy to use and also has a lot of good features. One feature I like is that if you want to call someone from your directory and return a call it allows you to just press 1 to include it in front of the number's area code. - Cordless Telephones - Dect Cordless Phone - Cordless Phone - Vtech Cordless Phone'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Ipod Accessories - ipod accessories, ipod


I got this product promptly in the mail so that much I like. I also like how cheap it was and to explain more here is a list of pro's and con's

Pro's

- Cheap

- Nice fit

- Works

- Case stays on even though it looks like its not on

- If you mess up with a screen protector you have 5 more tries :)

Con's

- Not easy to put the screen protector on (took me 2 tries but maybe that's because I'm not good at it)

- The stylus is awkward and doesn't slide easily on touchscreens. APPLE IPOD TOUCH 4TH GENERATION SUPER SLIM FIT CRYSTAL BACK COVER CASE - SMOKE BLACK, WITH 6 SCREEN PROTECTORS & 1 STYLUS

If you're looking for a case that will simply protect your Touch from scratches, this is the product for you. I keep my device in my pocket with my cell phone and everything seems to be going great so far.



Description:

- The case snaps on, it does feel like it can easily fall off, but you really have to work at it to take it off.

- The screen protectors do their job. You get 6 of them, can't go wrong. Just take your time putting them on and you wont have a problem.

- The stylus. Just simply threw it away, it's a piece of garbage, but I didn't buy this for the stylus.



Over all I feel this was a solid purchase for my Touch. No, it probably wont protect my device from falls and such, but that's not what I was looking for.



At the time of this Posting, I paid [...] w/ free shipping. Though I really enjoy this product, I honestly wouldn't spend anymore than [...] on this.

The case or back cover is a better description is perfect because it is thin and protects well. It fits tight also.

The screen protectors work great. I have use 4 different kinds and they all are difficult to place on without getting lint underneath it.

The stylus is useless for me I didn't want to use it.

Great value!

A little disappointed with the case.. It had scratches on the back before I even put it on the iPod. The stylus is useless. The covers are alright but are easily scratched (the first one I put on had marks in less than a week with little use). Again, disappointed.

The case caught my eye because of the cool color. When it came in the mail (which was fast) I was a little disappointed when I saw and felt how thin it was. I was expecting a little more protection or cushion. If you want a "super slim" case then this is a good option for you. But overall, I'm satisfied because it does the job and the 6 screen films are great.

I liked the case very much. Fits perfectly. The case is smoke black in color and covers the back of the ipod. Yes, it protects the ipod only from scratches...no cushion or anything. But that is all I need. Luckily I didn't have any trouble with the screen protectors.

Stylus no good :)

I just received this case and I gotta admit that its really cool. The case covers the back of the iPod extremely well even though it looks like there is no case at all. Now the screen protector is kinda tricky to get it on so you gotta be patient and careful with it. It took me 2 tries to get it just right. So its a good thing you protectors jaja. The stylus on the other hand is pretty worthless. I don't use it at all and don't plan to. Overall a great product and and you can't beat that price!

The case is a normal well fitting hard case that covers the back of the ipod. The screen protectors are perfect. They readjust well and, though they aren't high end, you won't find a better one for the price. The stylus is absolute junk...don't buy this for the stylus. - Ipod Accessories - Ipod Touch 4th Generation - Ipod - Ipod Touch 4g Case'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Samsung Laser Printer - ml-2010, samsung laser printer


The box came in the mail slightly opened. The cartridge comes in a bag. I tore the bag open and the toner dust immediately went all over my face, up my nose, in my clothes and hands. The cartridge was covered in toner dust.



The instructions that came with the toner explained that a tape like string must be pulled from the toner before using it. The string had been removed before the toner arrived.



I placed the cartridge in the printer and the printer did not recognize that the toner cartridge was inserted.I removed the toner cartridge and threw the toner out. There cartridge left toner residue in the printer itself. Compatible Samsung ML-2010D3 Toner Cartridge. NEW COMPATIBLE Samsung ML-2010D3 toner cartridge, black delivers up to 3,000 pages.

You take a huge risk when you insert this into your printer. I want to make it clear that this is NOT a Samsung product. I bought it without looking too closely at the detail -- the seller should make it more clear that this "compatible" word means NOT ORIGINAL. In fact, those words should be used, as when you put this junky Chinese stuff into your printer, it makes a horrible clunk -- there is powder spewing out of it into my machine, and a stripe shows up on every page. You know how most toner cartridges have an element that slides across the wire, cleaning it? This one doesn't have that. It is pure garbage.

This replacement toner cartridge is advertised as "compatible" with the original. Indeed, it works very well right out of the box, in the ML-2010 printer. The print seems somewhat darker than with the original, so I use the light setting in the printer options, to save on toner. Because of this (minor) difference I only gave the cartridge 4 stars rather than 5. A similar cartridge has been working for me in another printer for 6 months without fail.

After reading the reviews, I decided to take my chances since this option is so much cheaper than the original. After installing the toner, I printed a few test sheets and discovered the green drum that applies the toner to the paper was deeply scratched, which caused it to print the scratch marks repeatedly across all documents. Needing to print some time-sensitive documents and not wanting to drive to Kinko's, I decided to remove the drum from the old cartridge and install in the new one, which resolved the issue. It is not terribly difficult but is messy dealing with the toner. Remove the 4 screws on the ends of the cartridge, then the 2 screws on the top of the cartridge, which allows the top piece to be removed. This allows the two end caps to be removed at which point it becomes obvious how to remove the drum. Not a great option but better than sending it back and wasting the time for a return.

JUNK - DO NOT BUY from Datazaar - This product is NOT compatible with Samsung, and probably lacks correct CHIP; When my current cartridge was finished, I tried one of these 2 I had just bought from Databazaar, and did NOT work - when I tried later to get COMPATIBLE replacement from DataBazaar or refund, they refused because "30 days had passed" -How RIDICULOUS - people only use new cartridge when old one finished, and no normal consumer will open and "try" a new one until old one is finished. So DataBazaar is punishing consumers who plan ahead - if 30 days passes from Databazaar purchase, you are OUT OF LUCK with this company. My suggestion is buy from company with 1-year guarantee-warranty. I have now gone back to company I used for many years. Incidentally, Amazon did nothing but act as e-mail intermediary-- I don't know the value of A-to-Z. - Ml-2010 - Ml-2510 - Laser Printer - Samsung Laser Printer'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Large Tent - large tent, camping


An excellent tent for the price.



Easy for one person to put up, but because of the height of the tent, the rain fly is a bit difficult to get in place. Also, the eight rain fly tie down lines tend to get tangled up. I have found that unless there are extremely high wind conditions, you really don't need them, so I just coiled them up and secured them with wire ties.



It has withstood one very heavy rainfall with no noticeable leakage. More than I can say for any other tent I have used.



Ventilation is great. Plenty of screened panels that can be opened. The "hinged" door is nice too. The screened room is a real plus, but it would have been even more so had they extended the tent floor to cover it too.



It is difficult to get it rolled up enough to get it back in the carrying case, but that is true of every tent I have ever owned.



Very happy with it thus far. Coleman WeatherMaster Screened 4 Tent

GET A FEW CANS OF CAMP DRY. This tent leaked fairly bad the first time we used it at Woolly Hollow state park in Arkansas. I think the rain fly diverts water directly onto the back side windows and on the seam where the door hinges and ours leaked pretty bad at the point where the mesh meets the bottom part of the window. Those nights it rained a good bit and we "fixed" the leak by detaching the rain fly on the back poles and tying it to the guy lines then to a tree, so the water would run off the very back of the tent more, instead of dripping right at key seams, this seemed to fix the problem. We have since put 3 coatings of camp dry and used a couple of tubes of coleman seam sealer and this should be a great tent from now own. (guaranteed not to leak......after 3 coatings of camp dry) should be there slogan.



On a positive note, I haven't had a tent from Coleman that hasn't leaked yet, but learn from me, always seal them with camp dry or similar product and seam sealer BEFORE you need to, and you will have a great experience and have a tent that will last for years to come.

This is a good solid tent for camping. Pretty easy to set up, though with 2 people, it'll be much easier. At about the third month of daily use, it started leaking. Get some camp dry, you'll be fine.



Also, be careful of cutting into the shipping box with a knife. The tent is literally right there. I was careful with my cut, but still ended up slicing into the carrying bag - lucky I didn't damage the tent inside.

Very happy with Amazon.com. Free standard shipping and arrived within 4 days. The tent is great. Very roomy, enough for 4 people, you can stand while changing clothes (nice! We are 5'10" tall) and the extra screen room is awesome. The only complain was the tent pole made from metal; made the tent heavy! the good side of it: the tent is very sturdy.. I wish the pole was made of lighter fiberglass. Also the flap covering the zipper on the door tent can be annoying. It is an extra protection..but we are very happy without it. Overall, great tent, great value, great for all weather.. and the kids and us love the screen room.. the feature that is rare found in other kind of tent! The reason I did not give five stars was for the heavy poles..It would be perfect if in the future there would be a very strong lite fiberglass pole, good enough to stand a tall tent!

My son purchased this tent for him and his girlfriend to go camping. They had no trouble putting it up and were very pleased with it. Perfect for two twin sized air mattresses with room to spare. Looking forward to using it again this summer.

I love this tent! It was an easy set up for my husband and I. The polls are thick and very sturdy and the screen porch cami in real handy when we stopped to eat since the bugs were horrible! We had a real hard rain come through to and had no leaks anywhere but we also put a seam sealler on it before we used it just for extra protection. I would recomend this tent to anyone wanting a spacious and airy tent! It has great ventalation!

Well I finally got to set this tent up. It is very nice. If you sit in the smaller screen porch you can open the rest of the tent up and the whole thing feels like a big screen porch-very nice and also private. I took the room divider and used it as a wind block on the screen porch. Just connected it to the outside poles and will tie some small rope or heavy string loops on the upright poles to attach the divider to. The divider has many tie things to use to tie to the loops added to the uprights. You'll see what I mean when you get the tent up. Took a while to get the rain fly on alone. Put this baby up before you get there esp. if it's dark. Ist time will take a while. Next time should be easy-follow their directions-it's really a fun tent and kids will love the openness. Wish it had the hard door some of colemans are said to have. I will be velcroing the screen doors to the main tent at the bottom for less wind inside-not a big deal.Very good in the wind for a cabin tent. - Tents - Coleman - Camping - Large Tent'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Strength Training - fitness, strength training


If I had to pick one word to describe this book, it wouldn't be "big", it would be "complete". It's not just a big book of exercises- its that plus a whole lot of other info as well. Here's some of what I liked the best about it...



-it devotes a chapter to answering questions we all have about lifting, questions such as "how fast should I lift?" or "how many repetitions should I do?"



-the exercises are organized by body part, so you get a bunch of ex's for the chest in Chapter 4, a bunch of exercises for the back in Chapter 5, and so on. Easy to navigate around in this book.



-included is a section on warm-up exercies- which a lot of people forget about doing. Here you'll find a lot of stretches.



-there's a workout plan towards the end of the book for just about every need you might have. For example, you'll find a workout plan for the crowded gym, for fat loss- even for vertical jumping. Neat!



The book ends with a section on cardio, and a section on nutrition. As you can see, while it is a "big" book of exercises (and kinda heavy too), its also a very "complete' book as well. Those who are interested in getting big arms might also be interested in Smokin' Hot Guns!!: How an Average Guy Can Get Big, Muscular Arms In One Workout A Week. The Men's Health Big Book of Exercises: Four Weeks to a Leaner, Stronger, More Muscular YOU!

The concept of Men's Health Big Book of Exercises is great: collect hundreds of exercises, group them by muscle group and add some background information and nutritional advice. There you go: the workout manual to make all others obsolete. But despite the lyrical reviews posted here, I found this book disappointing. In short: the collection of exercises is great, but the way they are presented is not optimal. A serious framework to construct your own training plan is absent and the nutritional information is downright silly.



EXERCISES



What I liked about this book is the sheer number of exercises; they are the reason I continue to use this book every now and then. Each exercise comes with at least one clear picture and has some handy little performance tips scattered around. However, this being the main event of the book, there are a number of omissions that I would consider flaws.



First, there is no connection between the discussion of the anatomy in the beginning of each section and the exercises. It's great that you are shown the different muscles that make up the back, but in the 60 or so exercises that follow, there is no way of finding out which muscle or part thereof is targeted by which exercise. Also, if you give 15 variations of one particular exercise, it would have been logical to mark the variations in terms of level of difficulty. No such luck.



Basically, the book first gives some fairly detailed information on an entire muscle group (albeit with some less than great illustrations), but then simply dumps a long list of exercises on you. Though the number of exercises provided is much smaller, the book Strength Training Anatomy by Frederic Delavier is infinitely better. It tells you not just how to perform an exercise but also how an individual exercise targets each specific muscle. I sincerely hope Men's Health takes some cues from Delavier for their next edition of the Big Book.



TRAINING PLANS



The 'exercise plans' in the Big Book are alright, but if you are looking for a good, consistent framework to get maximal results (as opposed to just "doing something in the gym"), I feel the The Body Sculpting Bible for Men is way better. It may not have the same number of exercises, nor nice color photos like the Big Book, but I feel the overall framework of training is much more solid and consistent than the somewhat hap hazardous and confusing approach in Men's Healh Big Book.



NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION



Now, if it were for the exercises and plans alone, I would still have given the book three stars, maybe even four; the sheer number of exercises makes it quite unique. Five stars would be out of the question, because the difference in content quality is too far off from some of the other books available. Still, I decided to lower the rating by one more star, because of the nutritional sections which are silly at best.



First let me say that from a magazine (such as Men's Health) I fully accept a somewhat eclectic approach. A new study comes out one month that says coffee is bad for you and the next month another says it's good - all fine. A book, however, I expect to be a bit more authoritative. This book is not.



The Big Book opts for the "high protein, medium fat, low carbs" approach. I think Susan Kleiner in her book Power Eating clearly demonstrated why a high carb, medium protein approach is far superior for building muscle and losing fat. Other than the Big Book, Kleiner backs up her story with sound scientific references. Where the Big Book settles for "A study in Denmark found...", Kleiner takes a truly scientific approach. Her conclusions are very different but much more logical and actionable for anyone who can think beyond the simplistic adage "muscle is built by protein, so the more protein I eat the more muscle I get".



Perhaps for people living in the US the nutritional advice in Men's Health Big Book makes some sense. Unspoken assumptions in the book seem to be a consequence of its orientation on the mainstream US audience. First and foremost, you are assumed to be too fat, or at least struggling with overweight. You also really like to eat a lot of fat and most certainly eat lots of animals. Also, you are not willing or able to change any of these habits.



Even within that context, the advice that comes out is sometimes downright puzzling:



- Beans, peas and corn should be avoided as they contain a lot of starch (p. 442)

- However, whole milk is fine (it's not all that much extra fat anyway), source cream is almost pure fat but hey, serving size is generally small, so go ahead! Other "healthiest" or at least "guilt free" foods: butter, pork chops, full-fat cheese, chicken thighs, coconut (p. 444 - 447). This one I found a particularly funny health advice: vinegar is good for you, so sprinkle some on your caramelized onions (!) or in your mayonnaise (!) before you spread it on your sandwich. Now, maybe I have been gone from the US for too long, but I don't think that I ever saw anyone health conscious eat mayonnaise sandwiches. But according to the Big Book, it's apparently great for your workout diet as long as you add some vinegar to it and stay clear of beans and potatoes. Yeah, right!



If you insist of eating a lot of fat, I can imagine the advice in this book to then at least cut back on carbs makes some sense. But it's obvious that this is no optimal diet advice for anyone serious about exercising. Again, Susan's Kleiner approach (high carb, medium protein and low fat) is far more sensible and much better researched. Sure, if you live in an area where KFC is considered lunch and a white sub sandwich is considered your healthy option, any truly sensible exercise diet may be out of reach. But of course, your results will never be the same as when you opt for a truly effective exercise diet.



In summary:

- Great book if you are a strength trainer and are simply looking to find some more exercise variations. The selection of exercises is unparalleled. Major flaw: the book doesn't tell you why and when you should choose one exercise over another, or which muscles each exercise targets specifically. For more detailed information on anatomy, how to exactly perform exercises and how these exercises relate to your muscles and objectives, a much better option is the classic but recently updated Strength Training Anatomy-3rd Edition (Sports Anatomy)

- If you need some guidance in setting up an exercise plan, opt for The Body Sculpting Bible for Men, Revised Edition: The Way to Physical Perfection instead. While Men's Health Big Book contains lot and lots of information, it gives you little guidance to make sense of it all. The little snippets of information basically have the same value as reading a couple of magazines. If you thought this book tied all the somewhat useful snippets of information from Men's Health archives together in a more consistent framework, you're out of luck.

- If you struggle with overweight and you are absolutely sure you cannot stray too far from the mainstream American diet or let go of eating lots of animals and fatty foods daily, then the nutritional advice in this book may be the best you can achieve. But if you are serious about your body and health and are willing to change to an optimal, goal-oriented diet (i.e. eat like an athlete), make sure to ignore all nutritional sections in this book completely. They are confusing at best, and if you follow a mainstream European or Asian diet, they will actually lead you in the WRONG direction. Instead, order a copy of the very dry, scarcely illustrated but content wise very solid Power Eating, Third Edition by Susan Kleiner. - Exercise - Mens Health - Strength Training - Fitness'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Strength Training - fitness, strength training fitness Strength Training - fitness, strength training