Saturday 5 February 2011

Universal - dry erase board, universal


Magnetic Melamine Dry Erase Marker Board, 24 x 36 (UNV43733) Category: Presentation Boards



This is a great magnetic dry erase board. It offers two functions: magnetic board and dry erase board. Both functions work great for us. We have been having the board for a little less than a month and have no problem with erasing so far. It is easy to erase (we use Expo marker and eraser). It wipes clean easily. The board is well construct (& looks great) and not flimsy like some of the other ones we have had earlier. Not only the price is great by itself (we paid ~$50), but it is also a bargain when you compare the quality of the board.



The board is easy to install. You drill a couple of holes to secure two plates (provided) and hang the board. You can install it vertically and horizontally. It also comes with a tray for your markers/eraser.



Highly recommended! Universal Magnetic Dry Erase Board, Melamine, 36 X 24, White, Aluminum/Plastic Frame

I just purchased this board an I love it. It is easy to erase with dry erase pens and the magnets stick great. The construction is heavy duty compared to others I looked at at local office supply places. I would buy it again.

I didn't think this board was going to all that great for [...] but was pleasantly surprised when I opened the box. Plus it was super easy to put up.

For the reviewer having a hard time erasing your board. Even though they are the cheapest, Expo brand markers and erasers work best for me. Also, every once in awhile I wet a paper towel w/ some rubbing alcohol and give it a good wipe down.

The white board seems to be of good quality -- it writes and erases cleanly using Expo markers, and heavy card stock with weak magnetic tape on the back sticks firmly, even through multiple layers of paper. You can't beat the price either, compared to similar products at retail stores. Unfortunately, the manufacturer's packaging is extremely poor and the board is very much unprotected inside a thin cardboard covering. As a result, all 3 shipping attempts to me arrived with a board that was bashed in and broken in the front, the back, and a corner, respectively. I learned that this is an ongoing problem with this product, so I ended up picking up the board myself from a distribution warehouse across town...in perfect condition! I imagine the manufacturer is not very motivated to improve the packaging, because each damaged board results in the shipping company paying for it...so the more damage the better!

Must admit after reading some of the reviews I was leary. However, read a recent one and thought maybe things were fixed. Much to the credit of that reviewer I must say they seem to be. I recieved the white board the very next day in perfect condition!! I am so impressed that I am going to order another one!!

I purchased this magnetic whiteboard as a way to show off the magnets I've collected from traveling the country on my motorcycle. It works great! The perfect size, room for more trips, and holds the magnets well!

Nice size board, great packaging so it arrived in one piece, and it shipped quicker than promised. Tray clips on. Came with all necessary hardware for mounting. Really great value compared to office supply store prices.

I wasn't sure what dry erase board would be good to buy online but from the good reviews I chose to go with this one. It arrived much earlier than expected which surprised me because of the size of this board and it was cheap, 25 bucks plus 15 or so on shipping. It is very sturdy and looks pretty good, aluminum sides with rubbery edges. Plus it comes with a marker holder which is a little weird to put on but with force it snaps on and stays on. Two different ways to mount, I popped off the oval pieces of plastic in the corners and then screwed it into my drywall like that and it holds great. I like dry erase boards cause they're very simple to use and they can help you become more organized. I don't have to remember so much anymore. - Dry Erase Boards - Board - Dry Erase Board - Universal'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Universal - dry erase board, universal dry erase boards Universal - dry erase board, universal

Honeycomb - motorola, honeycomb


When I first got the Xoom about a week ago I turned it on and I really wasn't blown away. I use lots of devices, and my first impression of the Xoom just wasn't stellar. However, I could see the potential, and so I kept using it, I got some apps, I started to learn the interface and the depth of the features.



Sometime during day 2 of using the Xoom it really hit me. The Xoom and the iPad are like chess and checkers. When you first start playing chess (or trying to use the Xoom, in my amazing analogy) you feel overwhelmed and confused. You can't really do things smoothly, you don't understand the options, it just is not a great first impression. On the other hand, your first game of checkers (or using the iPad) is probably going to be pretty smooth. It isn't complex, most all the options and concepts are obvious and easy to understand and your first game is going to be pretty similar to your hundredth.



However, as you start to understand the Xoom (or chess) it really starts to grow on you. You understand what you can do, how to do it, the amazing depth and possibility in the device. While the iPad (or checkers) players are still having roughly the same experience time after time, with the Xoom every day of experience with the device makes it more powerful and enjoyable to use. In the end, the Xoom becomes a much better device than any of the competition; it just takes some time for you to learn what it is capable of and how to make the most of it.



As you can tell from the last three paragraphs I wasn't exactly impressed with the Xoom to start. I wasn't even sure it would replace my current device for most things. However, by day two I started to really "get" the device.



This first happened when I needed to look over and annotate a PDF someone had sent me. I downloaded it from my email, and was able to actually put it in the Xoom memory where-ever I wanted in whatever folder I wanted. Wow, that is kind of cool, can't do that on the competition. Next, I was able to open it in a PDF reader, using this fancy program (which I easily found on the marketplace). I went through and did what I needed (with an amazing free hand drawing tool, it was a snap!), then I jumped back over to email, attached the newly edited PDF and sent it away. Now maybe I just never tried hard enough, but I don't think that is possible on some of the competition. That freedom to download files, do what you need, and then send them away again. On the iPad apps I have used it always requires the files to be in something like Dropbox, which is fine, except it would have made what I did impossible without using a computer.



Another "WOW" moment came when I wanted to get some ebooks onto the device. Now, on my Apple products this is generally a pain, you hook the device to the computer, go open itunes, you go to a certain tab, and a certain area, and a certain feature, and if you do it all right you can drag your ebooks over to the reader. It was rather simpler on the Xoom. For the ebooks I had on my computer I just dropped them in Dropbox, then I downloaded them on the Xoom, and using the Xoom file manager I easily moved them into a new "Books" folder I made in the Documents folder. Fast, quick, and simple and done on the device, rather than on the PC.



However, what really blew me away was when I wanted some ebooks off the web. Using the regular browser I was able to just download them directly from the internet onto the device. I then used the file manager again and simply moved them to the right folder. This really did impress me, my tablet was uncoupled from the PC, I could browse the full web, download things, and then make use of them all without ever needing to tether to my computer. I was hooked.



With my new excitement at not requiring my computer to use my tablet I headed over to an Android App development forum. Here developers had posted lots of cool apps that were in beta or that they wanted to promote. On competing devices the only way to get an app is through the sanctioned and controlled portal, not so on Android (and thus Xoom). Using the Xoom browser I bounced around the forum, I downloaded beta apps, and then I was able to easily install them. Again, this is all on the device, and these were not approved apps, awesome.



Another example of something that impressed me came on my third day with the device. I was using the CNN app (which is free and tablet optimized, go check it out) and I watched a video of a story that I thought was really interesting, but it was one of those that is only a teaser, and the rest is on another site. When I hit these videos on my iPad I just have to try to remember to watch them later on a computer, because they are inevitably flash based. Not so on the Xoom, I typed in the address, the flash loaded up perfectly, and I was watching the video in full screen with no trouble.



This process of growing more comfortable with the device and learning what it could do continued over the last few days. At every turn I would find something amazing that just wasn't possible on competing tablets. I discovered the glory of widgets (custom little desktop things to show you the weather, or news, or whatever). I found some live wallpaper (moving animated wallpaper, that can change and adapt to things, such as the weather). I just kept finding new awesome features and uses.



One thing I want to touch on that is perhaps more technical than the rest of my review is the screen. I use my tablets to read, I started using ebooks a while back and I found tablets to work pretty well for that. I do most of my reading at night before bed, so the backlit screen is actually helpful versus a traditional reader. Anyway, one of the things that has always bothered me about the iPad as an ereader is that the pixel density (that is the number of pixels (or square blocks of color) in each inch of screen space) is very low. The iPad has somewhere around 130PPI (pixels per inch). It was so low that it really did give me noticeable eye strain to read on the device, I could see the pixels, and it really just wasn't a great reading experience. This was so pronounced that for the last few months I had actually been doing most of my reading on a 4th generation iPod Touch. It had a smaller screen, but a higher pixel density.



Anyway, the Xoom has a very noticeable increase in resolution and pixel density. With its higher resolution it has roughly 33% more pixels than the iPad, roughly 300,000 additional pixels. This is something you can see immediately when looking at any text. It is a lot smoother and easier to read on the Xoom. However, the other side of this is that the iPad has a different display type, that does have better viewing angles and color/contrast. In my case I don't really care, I find the pixel density to be 1000 times more important than small color improvements or viewing angles but I feel I should mention it.



My point in these last two paragraphs is that the Xoom is a much better device for displaying text than any of the lower resolution competition. If you are looking for a tablet to read your newspaper and books and websites on, then you definitely should give the Xoom or other higher resolution tablets a look. In my opinion the resolution on the iPad/iPad 2 just does not cut it for text.



Welp, this is really starting to get long, so I guess I should wrap it up. I know this isn't like the usual review you read, but I really wanted to give people an idea of the experience of using the Xoom versus just giving the facts and the breakdown and the comparisons. The Xoom is a device that improves exponentially the more you use it. After a few days of use I really can't imagine returning to the constraints and frustrations of the competition. However, on my first day I wasn't that impressed, so be sure to stick with it and get used to it. Now I am off to make dinner, and to accompany me I am going to take my Xoom, which is streaming live video thanks to the wonderful inclusion of flash, the competition is going to stay sitting on the shelf (probably for the foreseeable future).



I just want to mention that I am giving the Xoom four stars because it is not perfect. As a reference after using the Xoom I would probably give the iPad / iPad 2 three stars. There are still improvements that can be made to tablets. I really feel like Android and Xoom are on the right track, but this is still not what I would call a perfect tablet, it is just the best that is available right now (for my uses).



I hope someone finds my review helpful, feel free to ask any questions you may have in the comments. MOTOROLA XOOM Android Tablet (Wi-Fi) - Android - Honeycomb - Android Tablet - Motorola'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Honeycomb - motorola, honeycomb honeycomb Honeycomb - motorola, honeycomb

Bruce Boxleitner - action, fantasy


"Greetings, programs!"



It was a long time coming, but the wait was worth it. While theatrical sequels to The Last Starfighter and War Games may or may not come out in the near future, and I am left hoping and praying for big-screen adaptations of Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series and Doc Smith's Lenman Series...Tron Legacy is here now (in glorious 3D) courtesy of Disney. I saw it on opening night in 3D with a huge box of kettle corn, a large group of friends...and I was first in line for the showing. Naturally my expectations were high.



The Grid



To be sure, this movie is visually and audibly stunning in every way. Everyone who was tantalized by the trailers and got excited by the visuals will NOT be disappointed with the art design or special effects. As they were leaving the showing before us, many people had neither a positive nor a negative expression on their face. They simply looked...stunned. Shocked. Out of it. And after seeing the movie I think I understand why.



This must be what it felt like to see Star Wars the first time in 1977. Seeing Tron Legacy (especially without seeing the first Tron) is like being transported to an alien planet through an inter-dimensional gateway. There simply has never been anything like this on the big-screen in history. The film cost 170 million according to box office records I read online, and you can see where the money went.



The computer world is literally a city of light. The first time you see it, it takes your breath away. The action sequences featuring light cycles, flying discs, and various flying vehicles are some of the most amazing ever captured. From the moment I saw the visuals that became the film's logo I knew the visual style of this film was spot on and I was going to love it.



The Game Has Changed



When you compare this movie to the first Tron, it's a MAJOR upgrade in just about every way (the one area I think it's inferior is the acting not quite on the same level). The dorky outfits of the first movie have been replaced with the new skin-tight outfits with glowing edges, the discs no longer look like ceramic Frisbees, the light cycles can make curved turns, ect. In truth, this was something I was worried about when I first saw the previews. It seemed to break from the feel of the first Tron film too much. But now...



This is how i feel about the overall feel of Tron Legacy compared to the first: I have seen many animated TV shows that were then made into feature films, and you almost always have the same feeling that characters were changed around, and usually some past events were totally re-written. In a good movie adaptation the essence is maintained but the experience is different (like an alternate telling or a what if?). Thus, while Tron Legacy breaks from many of the traditions of Tron (digital people now look much more like real people, real food exists in the Grid instead of just energy), at its heart it is a continuation of the story, characters, and world you have grown to love.



Flynn Lives



Yes, at its heart, this is the same world you loved when you saw the first Tron, with the same features and flaws. The first Tron was a visual masterpiece with unique music and visual flair, a simple but deep plot, and characters you grew to love on an age-old but engrossing quest to save the computer world and along with it the real world. This film is no different in these fundamentals. The visuals are amazing, the music is astounding, and the main plot is almost identical to the first movie (get out of system, defeat the evil program who rules the computer world with an iron fist).



The now older Kevin Flynn who was trapped in the digital world is no less likable, but expectedly changed as anyone would be after decades spent inside a computer. His son Sam is the kind of guy you immediately like. He's rich but not snobby, attractive but not superficial, a good guy but maybe just lacking some purpose and direction in his life. At any rate, he makes a great protagonist. Jeff Bridges is a bit subdued compared to his other roles lately, but his whacky zen charm still makes him fun to watch. His digital younger (flashback and arch-nemesis) self does not fare as well because while a digital world evil Jeff Bridges that feels a bit unnatural is no problem, when it's supposed to be Kevin Flynn in the past it just comes off as strangely artificial.



Probably the first thing everyone noticed from the trailer besides the light cycles was Olivia Wilde's character Quorra. She manages to be beautiful, innocent, courageous, loyal, child-like, fierce, and in all other ways awesome for the duration of the film. Her acting is flawless. Michael Sheen is totally over-the-top in a role that people will probably either love or hate, and Beau Garrett's Gem and Cillian Murphy's Dillinger will have you wishing they had larger roles. And of course there is one surprise I wasn't expecting regarding an old favorite character. But let's not kid ourselves...the real star of this movie is...the soundtrack!



Derezzed



The soundtrack...to Tron...is one of the greatest soundtracks in history. Please understand, I do not use these terms to describe a soundtrack lightly. My favorite kind of music to listen to is orchestral movie and TV music. From anime soundtracks like Vision of Escaflowne and Magic Knight Rayearth to under-rated scores like A.I. and the New World, I am a HUGE fan of orchestral tracks. I have literally hundreds of movie themes performed by the Prague Philharmonic Orchestra. I listen to the Star Wars soundtrack from beginning to end. I even recently wrote the Prague Philharmonic an email requesting that they record music on my wish list. That is to say...I take movie musical scores SERIOUSLY.



You should know that I am a fan of Daft Punk's album Discovery. Look it up on Amazon and you'll see my ecstatic review. Some people have unfairly criticized the soundtrack for Tron Legacy, simply because what they wanted was another Daft Punk album, another Discovery. This is NOT a Daft Punk album. This is a FILM SCORE, featuring a full orchestra in addition to the electronic wizardry of Daft Punk. And it is destined to become legendary. From the first moments of the film when the main theme kicked in I was blown away by the music, but there is much more to it than just that the music is phenomenal.



I would say that from 60 to 75 percent of the brilliance of this movie is the film score, and the reason for that is that the film was actually CUT to the film score, rather than the score being cut to the film. What this means, is that the film and its music are almost perfectly synchronized. Anyone who has watched a really good AMV on the Internet has seen the magic that happen when you cut the action to the music and it works magic in this film. The disc battles, light-cycle sequences, and chase scenes and fight scenes (Derezzed being the stand-out) are incredible because of how the music not only fits, but drives these scenes. And when the epic climax of the movie rolls around the music makes it a hundred times better because it is brilliant, and it is so loud, so strong, so appropriate, and so flat-out amazing that it just makes everything WORK. Some have said that they listened to the music on its own in order to more fully appreciate it. I say the opposite. See the movie to appreciate how the music was MEANT to be used. Awesome.



The Creator



Some critics and others might dismiss Tron Legacy as a simple candy-coated popcorn flick with all the depth of Super-Bowl commercial. "Tron Legacy isn't actually trying to be smart"? You have got to be kidding me. But then again...people said EXACTLY the same thing when the first Tron came out, and when the Matrix movie came out as well. I'm starting to think that every time someone says a movie has no plot what they really mean is "I didn't understand it."



This movie is NOT simplistic. The spiritual overtones of Tron once again are pronounced. Love them or hate them, they are what drive this story, not the basic premise of the plot. In the first Tron the Users were seen as gods, the ones who had a plan for everything, the great beings who watched over the Grid with benevolence. When Tron was given a mission by his User, it was akin to pulling The Sword From The Stone or learning to Use The Force. Likewise, Kevin Flynn's User powers are seen from time to time, making him seem like a sort of mythological wizard (Merlyn, Gandalf, or better yet Obi-Wan Kenobi from Star Wars: A New Hope). When the creatures of his self-created Grid turn on him we cannot help but see an allusion to our own world where in films and popular culture everyone sees to be angry at God despite the fact that he made them. This spiritual metaphor does not come off as silly or cheesy (at least in my opinion) but rather lends significant gravity to an otherwise straightforward plot.



There you have it. The new Tron is an amazing film in just about every way. Not perfect, but definitely the best movie to come out in years. The 3D is nice, but not required, as it is not quite up to the par of Alice in Wonderland and Avatar. It would be better to see this film on a digital screen where the wonders of the world of the Grid can really shimmer and pop off the screen in razor sharp detail (the icing on the cake would be digital 3D). I've seen it multiple times in the theater. You should do the same. This one movie you do not want to rent and watch on a tiny TV for your first viewing. You want to see it on the big screen. And then buy the Blu Ray and watch it on your home theater. This is one movie that would show off a high-def setup in spectacular fashion. Tron: Legacy (Four-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD / Digital Copy) - Action - Disney - Adventure - Fantasy'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Bruce Boxleitner - action, fantasy disney Bruce Boxleitner - action, fantasy

Corded Telephone - phone, trimline


Okay, so you've got your four-line, 2.4GHz Digital Spread Spectrum cordless phone with 100-number memory and built-in answering machine. And then the power goes out. Or you loose the handset in the couch cushions. Or you forget to charge it. Or you can't even figure out how to turn the darned thing ON. That's what the Trimline is for. It's a cheap, reliable, easy backup phone. The adjustable volume makes this thing really loud, and the backlit keypad is a feature somehow missing in my expensive cordless. And I like having a phone that's tethered, so I always know where to go when it rings. The memory works, but I don't think the people who buy a phone like this will use it much (I have only one number in mine, plus the emergency numbers.) AT&T 210 Trimline Phone with Memory Dialing (Black)

The box says the AT&T 210 Trimline is the best selling phone of all time, and I can see why. It's reliable and doesn't have a bunch of complicated instructions and programming to follow. It has good clear sound, and the handset has adjustable volume, which makes it good for the hearing impaired. Cordless phones seems to be gaining in popularity, but everyone needs at least one corded phone in their house for in case of a power failure. This simple, inexpensive little phone is an excellent choice!

I recently bought this phone for my father who likes his phones simple and easy to use. This telephone by AT&T works better than other, much fancier phones, including two expensive cordless phones with extra handsets, when I had to get a new phone for my new home. The construction of this telephone reflects great engineering; and it's very, very reliable for a price that's very inexpensive these days for a phone. Yes, it is corded; but when all you really need is a basic phone this really does the job.



The phone has back lit buttons which are desirable for those of us who are elderly or in any way sight impaired. The buttons could be brighter but the back lighting does improve upon no lighting. The phone offers well known features including "last number redial," and allows you to set the phone up with your telephone company so that you can use this phone with features like call waiting and three way calling. The phone has a mute feature, adjustable ringer volume and more. These functions never disappoint me. It also has a small knob that lets you switch between touch tone and pulse (rotary) dialing. I use touch tone dialing as most people do. I am particularly impressed that a phone in this price range even has a twelve number memory feature for speed dialing. Cool!



If you want to take a nap without the phone ringing, just turn the ringer off by using the knob at the base of the phone.



I highly recommend this telephone for people who need a basic phone at a cheap price that still has a few "frills" to like including memory speed dialing and call waiting. The extra features give you all you truly need to make this a well constructed telephone at a ridiculously inexpensive price. Sure, the back lighting for the buttons on the phone could be brighter; but overall this is still quite a good phone for the price. The phone takes up little space and it can even be wall mounted to completely save counter space in a kitchen or any other room.

I have two other ATT 210 Trimline phones. I like them a lot. I like the lighted buttons in the handle and the solid construction with the heavy base.



This newer version is very poor in comparison. Only some of the buttons are actually lighted and the lighting is very dim on those that are. Its feels too lightweight, especially the base. The construction quality seems very poor.



I wish I could buy the same phone built in the same way as my older ones.

... and it feels sturdy and dependable. It has all the features I need -- quick dial, redial, lighted keys, tone-or-pulse control, volume-control for the incoming sound, ringer-on-or-off control, three different distinctive rings... and in fact I intend to buy another.

I had no trouble programming long-distance numbers, and even my calling card number, into the phone (yes, the calling card number required two of the pre-sets, one for the phone number and one for the PIN, with a manual pause in between).



When I made an error during the programming phase, I had the same experience as the person who couldn't get it to program. The key is to press (1) program/mute (2) memory (3) the preset assignment (4) the telephone number (5) program/mute.



My intuition kept trying to override and press program/mute or memory in between the preset assignment and the telephone number, which caused the phone to both dial, and then not have retained the programming.



Hopefully if the person with the programming trouble tries once more, it will work.



My ONLY complaint about the phone is that I can't turn the volume quieter than the "normal" setting, the opposite of the phone it's replacing. - Corded Telephone - Trimline - Telephone - Phone'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Corded Telephone - phone, trimline corded telephone Corded Telephone - phone, trimline

Creative Photography


Peterson's books on Shutterspeed and Aperature are among the best I've ever encountered so when I saw this book in the soon to be released section I ordered it immediately. After waiting three months, it finally arrived and although I would not put it into the same category as the Aperture and Shutterspeed books, it is certainly a worthy addition.



First, I'm not a pro but enjoy close-up and macro probably more than any other type of photography. This book strikes a solid balance between buying advice and explanations sufficient for newbies wanted to get started in close-up or macro and a few creative ideas or style for others with more experience.



The emphasis is certainly on close-up above macro but with sufficient appeal to keep both happy. Ample explanations, nice use of comparative photo's and Petersons exceptional style of casual communication that provides insight into the shot itself.



Also, he includes wide angle, fish-eye and other less common lens types outside of just the macro itself...for that he gets an extra star as it is a topic rarely included in most close-up discussions. Not every photo is of stellar quality - although there are some beautiful examples.



Briefly, topics include equipment, depth of field and aperature, general tips, home studio, framing, magnification ratios, depth of field preview, and other essential information.



To sum it up...a worthy addition but not of the same quality or caliber as exposure and shutterspeed. Newbies will benefit the most while more experienced users may pick up a few worthy ideas. Understanding Close-Up Photography: Creative Close Encounters with Or Without a Macro Lens

The newest book from Bryan Peterson, released in March 2009, it cannot help but come in direct comparison with John Shaw's primer on macro photography.



However, this is a book on CLOSE-UP photography and that should be kept in mind when reading it. While macro is covered as much as close-up photography, both are given strong emphasis and many techniques can be applied to either situation.



This book goes into good detail about nearly every aspect of close-up and macro photography you might want to know a bit about: equipment, lenses, filters, diffusers, reversing rings, good point and shoot cameras, tripods, reflectors, ring flash, etc. However this will be a 'bit' about each one. On some, such as lighting topics, there are entire books out there written just on those subjects.



Depth of Field is covered very nicely and in more detail than Shaw's book, tying it in with composition, lighting and artistic decisions.



Overall, this is an excellent book and very up to date, printed March 31 2009. The cameras, lenses and other items mentioned are ones we are all using today or might buy. Artistically, the ideas are presented in a way that make you want to pick up your camera and go see what you can find. Readability wise, Peterson is an excellent writer and teacher which make this book very accessible to photographers at any level.

I have taught photography for the past 20 years and for much of this time I have been relying on Brian Peterson's ideas to help make many photo concepts more interesting going back to his original "Learning to See Creatively".

I found this book to be particularly worthwhile because it isn't limited to extreme close ups and, thank heavens, isn't filled with insect photographs. Rather, Brian suggests a number of approaches to the subject and shows wonderful examples.

If you are interested in close up photography, this is a Very Good Read!

For me, the bottom line is he gets good photos. They are arresting, technically excellent, and creative. At least some of them I would put on my wall. That's actually a very interesting "litmus" test - If you were to look at the "artistic" message you would get from many of these put on the wall at 16x20 size? I find many of these shots very pleasing, and certainly they would make a wonderful "trendy" design motif for any architectural interior. But is it art? I think in Peterson's hands, it is. It is close to some types of avante garde (did I spell that right?) art, or modern art. Its quite abstract, yet there is a visceral impact to the textures, broad soft colors, and complex play of light that fascinates, draws the attention in to another world which we never see in this way. I notice my mind, in writing this, tries to fall back into the truism that "this is just a magnification of small things, just an interesting curiosity is the result - like a strobe picture of a water drop." And then I open the book to "grok" a shot and imagine how it would look on my wall. Holey Moley! Looking at some of these shots does something that great art usually only promises to do - it refreshes the soul, preens the feeling of self-esteem, expands the sensibilities, opens the heart. This is obviously something that defies analysis and buggers description. I notice that any reviews at Amazon, the 5 star kind, may "gush" with praise or say things like "awesome." While often lacking in detail, such reviews may reflect an "enthusiasm of the soul" that gets opened up on an experiental basis. Just look at Peterson's shots and see if you agree, but as for this review in advance of purchase, my vote is that some of them are art you would want on your wall. This is an amazing "plus" for any photo book, to participate in the process of a good, perhaps great, artist at work.



Throw in the detailed usefulness of the mechanics of getting these shots, the skillful manipulation of technology, good writing etc, and you have a winner. You can't lose. This is a gem.



The only question I have is that Peterson uses really good lenses - expensive. I shoot Nikon myself, and with my D300 have a Nikkor 10-24 wide angle that cost around $1000. I have to admit the results seem spectacular and seem to reflect the expense, yet its hard to quantify this. Yet it's there. I don't think you need to spend $5000 to get these results, but it helps.



By the way, if you vote my review helpful, I get a nickel from Amazon for each positive vote. :)'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Creative Photography Creative Photography

Cleaning Tools


I am not so young and spry as I used to be and it seems by Toillete takes ever so much longer to accomplish than it did in days past. I have always been one of those people known clinically as "wax producers." In the medical field, there are people who "produce wax" in the ear canals and those who "do not produce wax." You can easily imagine which side of the fence you would like to be on when it comes to cleaning and tidying up your ears. One would like to be a "non producer." I am sure that being a producer fit in well somewhere along the line when it came to natural ear protection. But most of us no longer live in caves or in dangerously cold places unless that is our choice. Snow masses don't push us around too much anymore thus determining our lifestyle without our having a say in it. It may come to that shortly, but that is a whole different discussion.

So, I am a wax producer. That is nice, clinical, white coat language which covers up the reality. "My ears just have too dang much wax to suit me." It used to be that a quick swipe with a Q-tip and the problem was corrected for several days. But, I have learned that aging produces MORE ear wax, longer noses, and bigger feet on any given individual. We should be able to smell things more easily and walk around with a great deal more sure footedness. Instead, we are likely to stick our noses in someone elses' business and topple over and scream "I've fallen and I can't get up!" The very picture just makes you want to hurry up and get old, doesn't it. Well, not really. Wind back that Clock for yourself!

Back to ears...our minds tend to wander a bit also. Anyway, my vanity and basic desire to be clean has led me to worry about HOW MUCH ear wax is there in those old ears anyway? These days, I sometimes awake to a clicking in my head. And, No, unfortunately that clicking noise I hear is not the sound of my brain engaging its gears to get on with today's business. Instead it is an internal noise indicating that the old "wax producing" gene has been functioning at high speed. My ears have too much wax in them again. But what is "too much?" I can still hear just fine when the cats start whining about their empty stomachs.

So, I needed an implement that did two things for me. 1. I wanted it to get rid of excess wax and 2. I wanted it to help me judge just how much wax I was dealing with! (Such a pleasant topic, BUT facts are facts.)

But this little widget did that for me. It goes into the ear and bumps up against the canal OR against the wax, so that I can more or less judge how far the wax has extruded. Not too far, thank goodnes. SO BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN YOU STICK THIS THING IN YOUR EAR! It is not long enough to come out the other side of your head, BUT IT IS LONG ENOUGH to hit the delicate little structures that allow for hearing. It could easily mutilate those structures if there was not ball of wax present. But, if you have wax problems, or even if you don't, you have probably been using Q-Tips, (or God forbid, a toothpick) to dig around in your ears most of your life. So you have some internal "feel" for how much wax is normally there. Based of that self knowledge, this little insturment will help you figure out if that level has increased significantly, or if it is relatively stable. That will help you decide whether you need to rush off to the doctor to get your ears cleaned out, whether you can do it safely yourself, or whether all is well in those little canals.

But it is the other function that has given me the most relief. This little thing has a little scoop (2 little scoops actually) that allow you to clean out the excess wax. The scoops will get some wax off the protective ball in your ear if that is needed. It will ALSO clean out the excess that has glued itself to the sides of the canals like wallpaper. (See, I am now able to judge, by feel, how the excess wax is placed in my ears. Mine doesn't fall out all over the place as I feared. Instead, it hugs the walls of the canal just waiting to be scooped off.) You will be able to judge where your wax is and how to deal with it also. Like I said, there are two scoops. I have tiny ear canals, but the large scoop worked just fine. The small one must be for children. The scoops seemed to get out everything. I cleaned afterward with a Q-tip and there was nothing left to clean.

As stated in the documentation on this Ear Wax Remover, there is also a light in the little instrument. I, personally, do not want my sweet mate looking around at my ear wax, so I manage this procedure alone. My judgement is that the light is superfluous anyway. The ear canal is curved so that things don't get stuck in it with any ease. That is why you are not pestered by insects, birds, or airplanes flying into your ear. It is curved to protect you against such incidentals. So, taking a straight insturment and poking it into the ear without an otoscope is kind of pointless. I do not know what you would see. An otoscope has its own light, so this is kind of an overkill feature.

There are also tweezers with this gadget. Now, if something DID manage to wedge itself into your ear, you might be able to get it out with tweezers and then the light might be of some assistance. But, I do not reccommend having someone arbitrarily go searching for wax in your ears. Because of the fragility of the ear, I would think YOU would want to be the only one poking around in it. YOU can FEEL if you are hurting yourself. GO SLOWLY.

We all know there is a good reason that we were taught "never to stick anything in our ears that was bigger than, or closesr, than our elbows." It is really easy to jerk, poke yourself and to do irreparable damage. BUT, we all already know that and we have decided to stick something in our ears anyway.

So, I suggest that this is a good thing to do it with. This item will rid you of you of your worries about your earwax, and rid you of the earwax itself. And that was the whole idea in the first place. To be RID of that earwax. It is Such a Nuisance. So, use this carefully, and I think you will be quite satisfied with it. If writing on and on and on is any evidence of how good something is, then this item must be good. OR, then again, perhaps my mind is just wandering around somewhere with my pointy nose and my big feet! No...that may be, but this is a good product and I suggest you give it a try. It has alleviated my excess wax and all my worries about excess wax. What a good thing it must be. Now...about the Nose Hairs...again...a different subject altogether! White ear cleaning tool Ear Wax Remover with LED Light'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Cleaning Tools Cleaning Tools Cleaning Tools

Average


HTC Google Nexus One - Accessory Bundle (10 items) in Retail Packaging



Premium Vehicle Car Charger for quick recharging in the car - works as advertised, not sure I like the springy cord, but I could see why its there.



Premium Wall Charger: Perfect for home, business or travel - works as advertised!



USB Cable: Transfer data while charging your device with this data cable - works as advertised



Rubberized Hard Case (Black): Rubberized coated for protection and grip - this case is interesting, it has a square hole in the back for some sort of belt clip, but nothing of the sorts came in this package, another note if you put this case on, good luck getting it off, I haven't been able to yet (only really tried a couple of times)



Gel Skin Case (Black): Perfect cutouts and slim design maximize functionality - fine



Gel Skin Case (White): Perfect cutouts and slim design maximize functionality - fine



Horizontal Holster Pouch: Fine workmanship, durable stitching and a sturdy belt clip - good



Stereo Hands Free: Great for talking on the phone and listening to mp3s - these are crap, but I guess they work as a good backup for my stock headphones.



Screen Guard: Protect LCD screen from scratching, scraping and abrasion - these scratch easier than the screen, but at least they are removable and the scratches are gone.



Universal Car Mount: Designed to fit any phone with its adjustable holder - this was the worst part of the entire kit, it was a small generic POS phone holder, just all in all garbage, but I guess you get what you pay for it worked in my truck for about 2 days before it broke. Accessory Bundle (10in1) for HTC Google Nexus One - Packaging by MAGBAY'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Average Average

Carbon Filter - woodworking, respirator


I use alot of laquer and other volitile finishes. This mask works well. In fact, it is the first mask I have owned (out of three different brands) that did not pass any laquer thinner oder. The silicon warms nicely and molds to my face. I like the threaded screw on cartridges. That is the most secure and fool-proof attachment.

The price is reasonable too, considering the excellant functionality. North 7700 Series Half-Face Respirator, Medium

I've owned 3 of these in 26 years. It is a great product with adaptability to different exposure environments by a simple change of cartridges. It works if fitted correctly. The one weak link is the strap system as it is attached to the body of the mask. Over time the plastic becomes brittle and cracks. It maybe lasts 5-7 years. This current version may have improved in that area. Worth every cent if you like keeping your lungs. If you still smoke cigarettes though don't bother using it.

I worked in an oil refinery for 30 years and used a half face respirator almost daily. My company used several other brands, but they were uncomfortable for long periods and didn't fit well. North uses a more compliant material that is both comfortable and seals well. You can wear this respirator for 8 hours without discomfort. The only problem I had was with the plastic slip lock on the back of the neck strap. On earlier models it was flimsy and broke after a few months. This was stregthened on later models and is no longer a problem. The rubber inlet valves need replacement every few months if you use the respirator for several hours a day. Extra valves are easy to obtain online and are very inexpensive. This is the best fitting, best sealing, and most comfortable half face respirator. - Filter - Woodworking - Carbon Filter - Respirator'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Carbon Filter - woodworking, respirator filter Carbon Filter - woodworking, respirator

Dry Erase Board - dry erase, dry erase board


I bought these for my child to use in her wipe off books (that I also purchased from amazon) thinking that kids love colors and these were inexpensive for the variety of colors she loves them and uses them all the time and it also helps with learning colors! I also use the markers to homeschool on our dry erase board and they are fantasic, wipe off well, dry fast and they are really pretty!! Excellent buy! Board Dudes 2-in-1 Double-Sided Dry Erase Markers (42402BDUA-24)

Bought this set of markers for the brown color, mainly. The set came with other really beautiful colors that I find myself and my coworkers using them more than the other billion dry-erase marker we have.

I like the way these markers write. I buy Quartet brand whenever possible but didn't find them on amazon until after I purchased these. These Board Dudes markers are rather nice. They write smoothly and erase great. Most of the colors are bright and clear. The "dark" green is sadly barely distinguishable from the teal green, but is dealable. I don't know how well they will last, especially after my 4 year old has a chance to use them, but for the price, I'm not particularly concerned.

These markers are fine-pointed and provide a very narrow to invisible line when used on a vertical white board surface. They are inconsistent with ink delivery and all around leave you wanting. I don't recommend these markers.

The product description for these dry erase markers mentions a "bold" tip, and that they make "distinct" lines. I thought this meant they would create a similar line to a bullet or chisel tipped dry erase markers. These tips are tapered to FINE POINTS, making about a 3/64" line, unless you lay the marker over on it's side where you can use the wider tapered surface.



I've uploaded a picture of the tip of one of these markers so you can see if it's what you're looking for. I like the variety of colors, but it's helpful to know that in general, dry erase colors other than black, blue, and red, often leave a greasy residue that is not easy to erase.

I was really excited to get these markers. I thought the double-sided idea was really cool and fun, and I was really excited to use them in my 8th grade classroom. When I tried them, I was extremely disappointed. The point is too thin, so it doesn't create a thick enough line to be seen easily in the classroom. The flow of ink was also disappointing. The markers don't make a very bold line - in fact they write like other markers do when they are running out of ink. A bolder line could have offset how thin they are. My students also enjoy using markers on the white board and they were equally disappointed with the performance of this product that had looked so promising. Maybe these markers would be OK in a home setting - for a white board calendar or something similar - but they are not useful for a teacher to use in a classroom.

I've been using these markers on a Quartet melamine dry-erase board (this one: Quartet® Standard Dry-Erase Board, Melamine, 36 x 24, White, Aluminum Frame).



Pros:



- Pretty colors, and lots of them.



Cons:



- Very fine point (similar to a Sharpie fine tip like these: Sharpie Twin Tip Fine Point and Ultra Fine Point Permanent Markers, 2 Black Markers (32162PP)). Sufficient for me, since my whiteboard is just above my desk for my own reference, but I don't think it would be easily readable at a distance of more than a few feet.



- Watered-down color - on the board, they're not as bright or as opaque as I'd like. Writing tends to come out looking "outlined" - the middle of the line is light, while the edges are darker.



- This is my deal-breaker: does not erase well. Using this dry-erase eraser (EXPO Dry Erase Precision Point Eraser with Replaceable Pad, Felt, 9.75 Width x 3.25 Depth (8473KF)) removes maybe half of the writing, if I'm lucky. In some cases the eraser was completely ineffective. This is for writing that had been on the board for maybe two or three weeks. The markers do come off cleanly with whiteboard cleaning solution.



Not recommended & I wouldn't buy again - these are going in the trash.



Instead, take a look at these markers, which work much better for me: Board Dudes Double-Sided Magnetic Dry Erase Markers, 4 Packs (14002UA-24)

I like these Board Dudes dry-erase markers. I bought them specifically because they are the only markers that will stay on my food containers. It stays on the plastic lids while in the fridge or freezer. When it's time to wash my lids, I just use my dish soap liquid and it comes off. No other dry-erase marker I have found can do this. I don't want to use Sharpie markers because those are permanent. Other dry erase markers don't work on plastic containers. And I don't want to buy those expensive food labels. THis has saved me alot of time and I know how long I've had those leftovers in the fridge!

These markers are bright and thick enough for use on any dry erase board. I have three boards for personal organizing: blue, pink, and green (from Board Dudes). All the colors show up and they erase easily as well. I would buy a million of these if the variety in this one pack weren't so wide! - Board Dudes - Dry Erase Board - Dry Erase - Markers'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Dry Erase Board - dry erase, dry erase board markers Dry Erase Board - dry erase, dry erase board

Panasonic - panasonic


I purchased this because I was very unhappy with the new Canon A3300 that I also purchased just a week before this one. I did extensive photo tests with both cameras because I felt the Canons overall sharpness was bad. Both cameras are 16mp and although i'm a Canon fan I have to say they failed on the A3300. Even with setting custom sharpness, contrast and saturation, the normal straight out of the box settings on the Panasonic were way better.



The two big problems with the canon were most photos even bright outdoors had way too much noise. The other problem was no matter what setting and focus type, only the center areas were in ok and i mean ok focus. All four corners of the photos were on the blurry side and that's just unacceptable. Compared to this Panasonic...wow, much better and much sharper. When fully zoomed in there was a bit of noise but its expected. Night shots depending on how you take them also have noise but again depending on how and what you can work around it a bit.



There are minor differences with the two cameras like the zoom smoothness was a bit better on the canon and the user interface and menu screens were also a bit better on the canon. Not a deal breaker at all because I'd rather have quality over cosmetic things. The other minor things i found were that the Panasonic has the af assist light very close to the top corner of the camera where you put your fingers. Also the on off and photo/play aren't buttons they are switches which i'm a little worried about breaking so we'll see how they last.



One of the biggest differences is that this camera is faster. I found that saving photos is almost instantaneous on the FH25 but on the canon it was about a 4 sec pause to save before you could take another (a "busy" icon shows up. Most of all the functions on the FH25 are faster and i like being able to grab the camera and take photos quickly.



One of the not so great things about this camera is the battery situation. The battery does last pretty well but I like having a spare especially when on vacation. To get a new battery you have to purchase it direct with Panasonic because they must have a chip inside it so if its not an original panasonic the screen says this battery is not compatible with this camera, which means no cheap no name brands for 7 bucks. You have to buy direct and with tax and shipping its $63 bucks. YIKES....that's a bit much, i can see 25 or 30 but 63? the camera itself is now $139 was $179. Amazon now carries the extra batteries at $49.00



Overall i'm all about quality and sharp photos and this camera does that. If you don't care about the spare battery cost or that the user interface and menus look like 20 years old, i think you'll be happy with this camera.



Photos for the most part are well exposed and using the full Ai seem to always come out perfect. There will be a slight bit of noise in certain shots but sharpness is never an issue. The whole thing about higher mega pixels is better isn't completely true, its all about the sensor size. Do some research about that as I did but believe me, this camera really does a great job. I've posted a few sample photos.



UPDATE 8-17-11

Still loving the picture quality of this small camera. I even tested out the new Canon SX230 and again this FH25 was sharper and photos were exposed better. The batteries are available on amazon for 49.99 at the time I got my camera they were only available direct from panasonic. The full iAuto setting is amazing and it really does a great job, I've taken photos with it that I will be publishing in my second book next year. That's how good I feel the quality is. Panasonic DMC-FH25A 16.1MP Digital Camera with 8x Wide Angle Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7 inch LCD (Blue)

Lot's of positives for this camera:



Advertised as 8x optical zoom but that's video. It's 10x in photo mode, 22.5x if you employ the digital zoom as well.



16.1 mp is amazing for a camera in this price range. I actually used the max digital zoom and still got good resolution photos.



About 2 dozen scene modes (portrait, beach, sunset, etc) that work well and are easy to select. Text scrolls across the screen explaining its use as you you move from mode to mode.



Very easy to use. About 1/2 hour with the manual and camera and you can understand and begin using all the features.



Image stabilization sems very effective. I shot every thing hand held even at max zoom and liked the results.



Great battery life. I chrged it 1x on a week vacation but that was just in case. Could have gone all week with 100s of shots.



Like most digitals the camera has very little built in memory so you need to buy a memory card. I chose the PNY 16 GB that has more room than I think I'll ever need.



One negative this camera shares with most point and shoots: you miss a viewfinder in very bright sunlight. But the screen is bright enough to make it manageable so I still rate this very highly.

I am a novice photographer and basically wanted an easy to use point and shoot to take pictures of my family and friends. One reason I gave the camera 4 stars instead of 5 was because the camera does NOT zoom while taking video. I was a little upset b/c I thought that this version, unlike the FH20, was suppose to have this feature. I wish I purchased the ZS5 model instead. Besides that fact, everything about the camera is great. It takes very good quality photos fast. The video is also good quality. It does well in low light and in fast moving action. I have only had the camera for a few weeks, but so far so good.

I haven't had this camera for very long before writing this (only 1 week), so I'll update in about a month. So far, however, it's exactly what I expected. I was going to get the Nikon Cool Pix, but that had too many bad reviews. So I bought this one. I tested it just once by taking photos INDOORS under flourescent light. Photos came out better than I thought they would. Digital screen is bright, and has settings that even allow you to change the angle of view in case you're holding the camera above your head.



The other reason I bought this is the size and ergonomic design. I need a small, decent camera to take around w/ me for misc parties and such. I have another, much better Canon SLR, but that one is big, bulky, heavy, and as such difficult to keep inconspicuous. In the past, when on vacation or in another country, I was often the center of attention when I pulled out the camera or traveled on public transportation. That could be quite dangerous. So, I opted to buy this camera. Has a nice, attractive design, nice blue color, but not so nice that it looks like it's $1000 bucks. And if it's stolen or I'm robbed, I'll be mad, but it's not as if it'll take $1000 bucks to replace! And I could hide it while traveling. It's small enough to put in your pocket. It would bulk up your pocket, but it's much safer than carrying around an SLR around your neck.



Some of the cool features is face recognition technology. It actually puts a square around people's faces! It will focus on those faces. That feature I did test and it works. The few photos I took were very clear, focused, color was as true to the real scene as I could tell. And I only used a setting that saves 5m of information.



Most features are easy to get to quickly, using the menu buttons and such. There's even a feature that allows you to set a "normal" scene setting if you know you use it a lot. This allows you to go back to it quickly if in a different scene setting.



One con is that some features aren't available depending on the scene you're using. That would be fine, except that it will take a few months of using the camera to really get familiar w/ what you can and can't use depending on the scene setting. The instruction manual is unfortunately on CD-ROM in pdf format, so if you're away from your computer and you need to look up a feature to remind yourself how to use it, you're out of luck.



But those are cons I'm willing to live with. I didn't expect this to be as good as my SLR, and indeed it's not. There is no manual focus, for instance, the flash is somewhat limited. But I didn't buy this camera to have manual focus and a good flash. I bought it to be able to hide in my pocket, travel w/ it, get quick, high quality-in-focus pictures, and not worry about replacement value. My initial tests confirmed I can do all of that and even more.



So far, so good. - Panasonic'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Panasonic - panasonic panasonic Panasonic - panasonic

Thermal Compound - cpu grease, cpu cooling


This stuff is like magic. I had been using Radio Shack's 'thermal compound' and when my core i7 was stressed, it could reach over 80deg. I just performed a stress test with the Arctic silver and my CPU barely cracked 50deg. I will be using Arctic Silver on all my PC building projects from now on! Arctic Silver 5 3.5G Polysynthetic Silver Thermal Grease CPU Heat Sink Compound

These are indispensable when building your own computer, or to simply maintain your overheating components later on in life. Take the heatsink off, use some 91% iso alcohol to clean it off, and then apply the AS5 (not the curse word) on, and watch your temps drop a good 5% or so. This tube is probably enough to apply on at least 4~5 heatsinks

Firstly, decided to reseat the zalmann on my old Gigabyte hd3870. In my last microATX case, the gpu was getting up into the low 90's. After removing the old compound with some 91% isopropyl and then applying some AS5 (on a tricky platform) honestly, I didn't see much difference. I realize, though, that the airflow was just terrible and so was the bios of the card witch kept the fan at 0% until 106c. After getting a new In-Win Dragonslayer case (GREAT airflow) and making my own bios (because gigabyte nor ati provide a useful one, thx) the card stays under 75c max settings minus AA in Bad Company 2. Whether this is the result of the AS5 or the combo of airflow + having the fan speed at 30% minimum, I dunno. Also applied some to my new unlocked phenom II x4 B45 and the temps stay under 55 at 3.5 oc (1.37v) and stock cooling. Though, didn't get to compare to the AMD thermal paste, hence the only 4 out of 5. Temps seem to get lower over time but also, nearly october now, it is getting cooler outside.

I was intending to fix my XBOX before Thanksgiving with this item but it took 3 weeks to arrive! I ended up just going to Radio Shack to buy the same item.......save yourself the waiting time and just go buy the Arctic Silver 5 at your local Radio Shack for a couple of bucks more. - Computer Heatsinks - Thermal Paste - Cpu Cooling - Cpu Grease'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Thermal Compound - cpu grease, cpu cooling computer heatsinks Thermal Compound - cpu grease, cpu cooling

Micro Sd Card - micro sd, 8gb sdhc


The Kingston 8 GB microSDHC Card works flawlessly with all my memory card readers: Kingston Mobilite, Kingston microSD Card Reader, and SD Card Reader. Windows (XP) has no trouble recognizing it as a removable drive.



- Device Compatibility

Using a microSDHC to MS PRO Duo Adapter, I am able to use the Kingston 8GB microSD in my Sony Cybershot DSC-W170 Camera -- it works like a charm; the camera has no trouble capturing pictures and videos (at a frame frate of 30 fps and a resolution of 640 x 480 pixels). All of my devices, such as my Garmin nüvi 360 and my HP iPAQ 111, are able to recognize the full capacity of the SD card.



- microSDHC Format

microSD cards of 4GB or larger are known more specifically as microSDHC cards. This 8GB Kingston card is therefore a microSDHC card. Beware that some older devices are NOT compatible with the microSDHC format. Such devices will only work with microSD cards with capacities of 2GB (such as this Kingston 2GB microSD card) or less.



(The technical specification for the SDHC/microSDHC format supports capacities ranging from 4GB - 32 GB. microSDHC cards of 16GB, such as this Kingston 16GB microSDHC card, is the largest capacity available as of this writing.)



- Class 4 Speed

This SD card is rated class 4 (data transfer rate: 4 MByte/sec, or 32 mbps) - sufficiently fast for the majority of electronics. A decidedly small number of electronics, most notably some camcorders and high-end cameras, require a class 6 SD card (the fastest transfer rate as of this writing). Transcend makes one that's rated class 6.



- Frustration-Free Packaging

Kudos to Amazon for their Frustration-Free Packaging efforts in using only recyclable packaging materials and in keeping the amount of packaging used to a bare minimum. As a giant in the e-tailing industry, Amazon's move will no doubt serve as an impetus for getting the rest of the e-tailers to follow suit!



---

The Kingston memory card is compatible with devices that support the microSDHC format. It is a fast (class 4) memory card with plenty of storage. Definitely recommended if the specs meet your needs! Kingston 8 GB microSDHC Class 4 Flash Memory Card SDC4/8GB

I didn't see any reviews for this product, so I wanted to let you know that the 8GB (7.4GB usable) works on my BlackBerry 8310.



Interestingly, although the BB showed 8GB with the new card, I only saw 4GB (3.2 or 3.4GB usable) when I first connected to my laptop and the computer asked to format the card when I enabled Mass Storage Mode (I used this mode to drag and drop into the BB). I could only see 4GB on my work computer as well.



However, after standalone reformatting the card (to FAT32) on my friends Compaq both of my computers (and phone) now properly see it as an 8GB card. My computer and phone information is below.



laptop: Win XP Pro w/ 4.2.2.12 BB Desktop Manager

work computer: BB desktop manager 4.6.0.12 with win2k pro

phone: curve 8310 with firmware: v4.2.2.170 and AT&T as provider



I'm looking forward to using the expanded storage!

I bought the Kingston 4gb micro SDHC card for my Blackberry 8830. At the current time, my particular Blackberry cannot accommodate a card larger than 4 gb, due to OS software that is not yet up to speed. The Kingston card is every bit as good as the more popular brands, with the exception of having a lower price. Be aware that using the included SD adapter is great...HOWEVER, if your laptop or desktop SD reader is not rated to read HC (high capacity) cards, then you may not be able to view the contents of the card or make changes using your computer(s). This happened to me, so I purchased a $10 USB SDHC card reader, and now I can use these higher-capacity cards in both my older laptop and desktop SD drives. Of course you can transfer data via a direct connection with your cell phone, for example, but it usually takes longer to do it that way.

Yes folks, unless you are absolutely sure about the vendor's reputation, I would say that most of the flash memory cards sold on line are fakes. This really is a huge problem since most of the buyers are unaware of this. So, what exactly is a fake? These are usually inferior graded flash memory that has been used to "upgrade" to an apparent higher capacity card with a name brand manufacturer's sticker on it. This type of counterfeiting is no different than selling bogus Rolex watches at greatly discounted prices. But the bigger and more insidious problem with bogus flash cards is that the customer is not aware of it, unlike the phony Rolex's where the buyer usually knows that they are knockoffs. The card may fail right away, or as more typically happens, they will work for a while and then fail...leaving the owner not a clue as to what went wrong. I purchased a Kingston flash card before our trip to Asia. Everything was going fine until we had snapped just over 100 photos. We were in Shanghai, right after our run through of Japan. The camera would not snap any more pictures indicating that there was a problem (I don't remember the actual message). In addition, we couldn't view any of the photos we had already taken. We thought at that moment that disaster had struck and we had lost all of our precious photos. A savvier member of our traveling group suggested that I might bring the card to photo/electronics shop, as they might still be able to retrieve the photos from the defective card. So here I am running around Shanghai trying to find the proper place to have surgery done on our flash memory card. We finally found a place, but it wasn't cheap. We paid $145 to retrieve the photos, and except for a few, we were able to salvage most. Considering what we spent for the trip overall, it was worth it. But it was also an expensive lesson. Before entrusting your photos to a flash memory card, make sure that you have purchased it from a reputable dealer. And regardless of where you might have purchased it, test the card before using it. There a number of software applications you can run from your pc to do this. I now use "h2testw" to test my flash cards after purchase and before using. It's a free download, just google to find it. You can also get more info on this problem by googleing "fake flash memory cards". I'm posting this on Amazon, because of a previous poster reviewing and reporting his discovery of the fake card he received from this vendor. This vendor is still here, and apparently still selling this memory card even after the buyer reported it to Amazon. So, let the buyer beware, and do his due diligence when buying these items. - 8gb Sdhc - Memory Card - Micro Sd - Cell Phone Memory'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Computer Hardware - usb floppy drive, teac


I purchased a new computer with Windows Vista platform. The computer does not have a floppy drive so I have been unable to use any of the 3.5" disks on which I have data. Recently while in a local thrift store, I found and purchased a used TEAC FD-05PU usb external floppy drive. Took it home, plugged it into the new computer, inserted a data-filled floppy, and watched a small miracle...it worked. A great little external drive accepted by Windows Vista on plug-and-play. I'm not sure how old the drive is, but it is whirring along with no problems. Teac Corp. - Floppy Drive - 1.44 Mb - USB - External

The USB floppy drive works great! Windows XP recognizes it, and I can plug it in and unplug it without rebooting. I got it from the seller very quick and it was everything I was hoping it would be. Great product! Great service from seller!

excellent product one came with my Sager laptop years ago and I've purchased more of them for friends, and family... everyone loves it and the price is great I can't even count how many internal floppy drives I've had to replace for myself or people I know regardless of who made them... this I've had for years and not a single issue yet

It does what it is supposed to do, no frills no thrills, not the fastest 3.5 out there, but for the price it cannot be beat. I recommend this for anyone who would need a 3.5 floppy occasionally. As for the use...simple...plug and play, my system uses XP and no interface problems. The purchase itself was flawless, a great company to do business with, again, I recommend them.

We upgraded our computers where I work and of course, no floppy drives. Our department did purchase an external floppy drive for all of us to use when needed. But I just can't be running back and forth looking for it, as I need to use one almost everyday, so I bought the TEAC External USB 3.5" Floppy Disk Drive (FD-05PUB). It works like a trooper and I am very glad with the purchase. I have to say though; I didn't pay anything near what the price is showing it costs today. If you're in the market for and External USB 3.5" Floppy Disk Drive, I would recommend this one. I'm actually thinking about buying another one for home.

This purchase was really easy to make and the item arrived in a timely fashion. It was even easier to install and has been performing exceptionally well. I would purchase from this site again when in need of something from their product line.

I was a little skeptical buying a 3.5 floppy drive to transfer literally hundreds of disks' data to a laptop and on to a CD.



This drive has been everything I could have expected. It is small enough to fit into a laptop bag. It is especially quiet while running and has performed very well.



If you are seeking a quality product, the TEAC External USB 3.5 Floppy Disk Drive is your avenue.

This is one of the best purchases a retrogamer could do. TEAC units are historically deemed as the most reliable floppy disk drives, and this USB version of a 3,5" FDD makes no difference: the unit can read old, rusty and dusty DD (720 KB) and HD (1,44 MB) disks with ease, and the installation (on Windows Vista) is as much plug-and-play as connecting a USB cable gets.



I'm still waiting to try the writing functionality with some empty floppy disks, but the experience with my drive has been excellent thus far.



For people complaining that the drive stops working after you plug-in it for the fist time, there is a catch: once you have disconnected the drive, you have to reboot to be able to use it again or Windows (Vista, but I bet it's the same on XP and 7 as well) will not recognize the drive anymore.... - Usb Floppy Drive - External Floppy Drive - Usb - Teac'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information