Wednesday 17 November 2010

Image Stabilization


The Canon A1200 has the features which we value most and as such, is our favorite digital camera. In particular,



* It can take wide angle photos - the equivalent of 28mm on the older film SLR's

* It uses 2 AA batteries which is great - especially when traveling overseas. In the past, we encountered too many occasions when a battery became exhausted in the middle of the day or could not be recharged at night. This was especially true when traveling overseas. So now we only consider cameras which use AA batteries because they can be purchased almost anywhere.

* It takes HD video.

* Its size is compact and can easily fit in a pocket or purse. Years ago, I enjoyed taking photos with SLR's and wore out 3 of them (the film versions). However, I missed many shots on vacation because I did not want to carry an SLR everywhere I went. The compact size of the A1200 allows us to carry it everywhere with ease. And it takes high quality photos.

* This camera does not offer as many options as some others. However, it gives you the options people use most of the time. I do not miss the other ones.



There are a few negatives. Cords to connect the camera to a TV or DVD recorder are sold separately. And it is difficult to force the camera to flash - it wants you to choose the mode and it will decide whether to use the flash. Also, this camera does not have the option to merge 2 or 3 shots into a panoramic picture. And it does not zoom in as close as some other cameras. All that said, we shopped around a lot and, in our opinion, the A1200 has the best combination of features and size. Canon Powershot A1200 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Zoom (Silver)

I bought the Canon A1200 because I wanted a small point and shoot that I could take everywhere with me. Other selling points were the optical viewfinder which I don't really use much, as well as the AA batteries. I use Sanyo Eneloops in this camera and they work great. I don't know how many pictures I can take with them on a single charge because I end up recharging them before they die completely.



The biggest surprise for me has been how well this camera does in low lighting. I have sometimes had trouble with getting good exposures in the dim lighting in my house but not with this camera. The sensor seems to be tuned for low light performance and it is a consistent performer for birthday parties or just taking snapshots of my kids.



I uploaded a few of the artistic shots I've made with this camera and I can say that the A1200 has exceeded all of my expectations for a point and shoot camera at this price range. It is a great performer and with a little effort it will take great images. I've messed around with some of the preset options and they help a little bit, but the auto setting works well if you don't want to fiddle with things. Also, the Discreet Mode is great! I accidentally took a picture with auto-flash and interrupted a speaker, so now I always use this mode to disable the focus light and flash when needed.



On a final note, I bought a Lowepro Volta case and it's a perfect fit, though there is no room for spare batteries. I just wanted a slim package that I can fit in my pocket. It's a bit bulky but not an inconvenience. I highly recommend this camera if you are on a budget and want a solid performer at the hundred dollar price range.

Like it's Powershot siblings, the Canon A1200 is a heck of a nice piece of equipment for shooting nature close-ups. I've taken this camera out twice now, and so far it has taken wonderful photos. I've posted some samples from a single hike.



Although the A1200 can't squeeze in on a subject as closely as the A480 (one of my all-time favorite cameras), this new Canon camera is capable of focusing just an inch and a half away from the subject in "Macro" mode. I usually carry one or two Pentax DLSR cameras as I hike through miles of woodland trails every weekend, and although they're great cameras, they simply can't beat Canon Powershots for capturing the tiniest nature subjects, in my opinion. If a subject is smaller than a quarter, out come the Powershots.



This camera takes photos that easily match or beat the quality of images you'll find in typical nature guides by Peterson or Simon & Schuster. Spend a year on the trail with it, and you could easily have a full set of quality publishable photos. Unlike more expensive point-and-shoots or DSLRs, this Powershot doesn't have camera raw or enough pixels to fill a wall, but the image quality and output is suitable for small posters, so who cares? Frankly, counting pixels and foaming over camera raw are not admirable traits, and neither of those things produces good pictures.



Image noise seems to be a bit improved since the A480s and A490s came out, especially when shooting in lower light. This camera has 12 versus 10 megapixels of its predecessors, so in theory you can get a larger photo now and still retain sharpness and detail. The controls will be familiar to anyone who has used a Canon point-and-shoot. I like the general layout of buttons compared to other brands, but that may be just because I'm more familiar with Canon. The A1200 has a viewfinder, which I'll never use because the thing is usually shooting photos right on the ground, and although I like the outdoors, I'm not sticking my face in the dirt and squinting through a viewfinder when I don't have to. The LCD screen is good enough. I've banged and tortured the daylights out of one A480 and killed another one after multiple assaults due to clumsiness. So far, this camera has taken a little knocking around without a complaint.



The A1200 shoots HD video, which isn't nearly as good as even an inexpensive video camera, but nonetheless I was surprised that the movies looked as good as they did. When shooting video, you'll get the best results if you stabilize the camera on a tripod, the back of a chair, a railing, or tree branch, depending on where you are. Video compression is a little cleaner that way, and you can avoid making people sick from zinging the camera around like a roller coaster.



Here are some tips for taking good close-up nature photos with this camera. I usually shoot with the dial in "P" mode. Most importantly, always remember to set the camera on "Macro" (the flower icon button). That allows it to focus as close as 1.5 inches away. Since the camera resets when you turn it off, Arggh!, you have to turn "Macro" on each time you restart it. On this camera, macro focus becomes dysfunctional if you zoom in, so keep it zoomed all the way out. Next, go into the menu and change the general settings. AF Frame should be "Center" so you can pick the point to focus on, AF Frame Size should be "Small" so it doesn't get confused as to where it should focus, and the Digital Zoom is garbage and should be banished forever. Unlike the "Macro" setting, these settings will NOT go away when you turn the camera off, fortunately. Since this is not an image-stabilized camera model, find some way to keep it still when shooting. When you're focused on a close-up subject, even a tiny movement is enough to blur your photo. To keep my camera still, I swear by a monopod with an adjustable pivoting head. Basically it's a one-legged tripod. A monopod can remove the worst of your hand jitters, and it doesn't even need to be extended to the ground -- just having your camera mounted to a stick helps stabilize your shot. Practice photographing coins or small subjects in your yard to get a feeling for macro photography. You'll notice that the area of sharpest focus is not as deep as it is when subjects are father away. You have to make deliberate choices on the point of sharpest focus. Check the photos on a computer if possible, so you can really see how well you're doing. And finally, shoot a million pictures. This is the digital age. You don't have to pay for dud prints any more. Be vicious when culling out the duds, because believe me, nobody wants to see 75 views of the same buttercup flower.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Image Stabilization Image Stabilization Image Stabilization

Playstation Eye - usb cable, active


Review of MonoPrice MP-CA3020U USB 2.0 Extension Cable - 10 meter



Solved the problem. Previously I had 30+ feet of passive USB cables connecting a Brother multifunction laser to a desktop PC. The printer function always worked reliably but the scanner function was sensitive to which PC USB port was used (Asus P4P800-E Deluxe motherboard). When I replaced that PC, none of the USB ports on the new desktop PC allowed the scanner function to work (Asus P5N32-E SLI motherboard). This active USB extension cable solved the problem.



Just plugged it in and it worked. No hassle. XP 32-bit.



[...]. USB 2.0 Active Extension / Repeater Cable A Male to A Female (10 Meters)

Bought this cable in order to place my USB net adapter in a better location. My computer is in a different building from my Verizon Actiontech router at the house, about 150 feet away. Even through timber-frame walls & a garage door, this arrangement has worked well for me. Without it, my connection was terrible, unusable, but now it's stable & works fine because I can move it to any location, right out the building if I wanted to. And there's no noticeable loss because of cable length as it's an active extension. A nifty solution if you're having router connection-distance issues.

I have a LifeCam VX-5000 HD webcam on the end of it and never had a dropped frame. Excellent. I did try to use a non powered 2.0 hub shared with a printer and it didn't do so well. If you have a powered hub or its own separate port you should have no problems.

I planned to use the hub as an extension for a USB hub so I could use my Bluetooth mouse and keyboard and camera on the HD LCD in the living room, from the PC in my office. The "active" cable is not active enough and the camera only takes partial shots and then gets chopped. Lots of dropped packets from the keyboard and mouse as well. I use a 15 foot active cable (a different brand) with a 15 foot passive pass through, and everything works fine. This seems to work for low speed devices which is why I gave it a 2 star instead of 1 star - but don't expect much. The only good thing is Amazon.prime shipped it free and fast.

There has been some recent debate regarding the ability to use this with the Kinect for an extension, rather than paying $50 for a slightly longer cable. Let me settle it by saying **this extension works flawlessly**. I bought the Kinect sensor by itself, rather with the X-Box 360 slim as a kit. When you buy the Kinect by itself, you will have a cord that has an AC-adapter, kinect plug-in (female), and a USB-plug in (male).



How to make it work:

1. Plug this USB cable extension into your X-Box 360 (I used the front port, but any should work).

2. Plug the AC adapter from the Kinect-conversion cable into the wall

3. Connect the USB extension to the Kinect-conversion cable.

4. Plug the male end of the Kinect cable into the conversion-cable.

5. Power on your X-Box and you should see a message indicating that it has been detected.



After all of my trials, I cannot see a latency issue between using the USB 2.0 extension cable and plugging the Kinect directly into the X-Box 360. Although there is bound to be a few differences in speed, it is CERTAINLY not an issue for any games you'll be playing. There will be a little bit of a lag issue, but that is due to the insane amount of processing that must be done to determine where you are standing relative to the game. This works perfectly!

I was skeptical, USB 2.0 is not supposed to work passed 16 feet due to timing issues. After that it needs to be repeated, and can be repeated about three times limited only by power. This means that this cable would need a device in the middle to repeat, but it doesn't have one. I suspect that some things will work, and some will not.



I plugged in a good webcam, the Logitech 9000 Pro and it worked like a charm. For two days. The port on the Dlink hub we were using failed. Light went out, dead port. But the other ports still work and moving this to another port got it working again. Now, the USB hub could have just failed on its' own, but there is always a reason. I do not know if it is a "fault" of this cable, but I think it pulls too much power and overloaded that port, causing it to fail.



I'd be leery about devices that use a lot of power, especially the USB 2.0 limit of 500 milliamps. Timing wise, the camera video looks fine, with no noticeable delay and rock-solid connection.



At this price, it certainly was worth it to try it out.

pretty solid cable. I hooked a web cam up to this so I can see when the neighborhood kids hang on my gate (refer to my review on electric fencing for a suitable solution to this) The camera works but I'm not sure how well this usb length handles other gadgets.

When i got the this item and plugged it in. worked great, had no problems...for about 2 weeks. i was on the computer and had been for about 3 hours then i lost connection. after going though and looking everything over, i found that it was something in the cable that had failed. i contacted the seller and promted for a refund and they replyed within the hour. LEAVE TIME TO TEST AND RETURN IT, if needed. the seller has been great through the whole ordeal, i believe it is a great product and i just happend to get one that filed. i would have promted for an exchange but i had found another way to do my layout, so i no longer really needed. i would recamend to keep the repeater part in a fairly cool area. it was a great product when it was working and they repeot that this is the first failure out of a lot of 4000+. again the company has been great in being in touch with me about my refund and have not given any sign of problem, they have been kind and polite tho whole time. they even called me to get more feed back. so atleast give it a try and if something is wrong then you can atleast be rest asured that they will fix what ever is wrong and make sure you are 100% pleased. - Active - Webcam - Usb Cables - Usb Cable'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


High Definition


This review is very similar to the review that I gave for the Flip Slid HD when it first came out. (Please see that review also...)



I have been a Flip camera user since they released the first gen. Flip Mino HD (not the new metallic model). I loved the camera. For what I needed it for it was everything I wanted. I soon became addicted to the Flip cameras and needed to purchase the newest one every time they came out.



I currently own the Flip Mino HD (1st gen) Flip Ultra HD (2nd Gen) Flip Slide HD, and now the Flip Ultra HD (3rd Gen with Flip Port). I also own a Canon GL2 and Vixia 30 video cameras and a Canon Xi digital SLR.





I got home from school on Tuesday and found my brand new Flip Ultra HD waiting for me. I had about 20 minutes to open the package, look and set up the features (time, date, etc.) before I had to leave for marching band rehearsal. During rehearsal I did some test shooting and I was very impressed with the quality of this camera, but I was worried about a few features.



I was reluctant at first to purchase this camera because of the 60fps feature. I did own a Kodak Zi8 and the 720p 60fps setting didn't not import into Final Cut Pro. I had to take it into compressor or some other software and change the file extension in order for Final Cut Pro to import it. Of course this causes a decrease in quality.



I was also reluctant because of the image stabilization feature. When image stabilization is added to a camera (of this size) video quality usually suffers. I know flips can be very shaky if you do not have a well trained hand. After a few hours a playing you will figure out the right movements that the camera can incorporate so your video will not come out shaky.



I don't use my Flip Slide HD because of the omni directional microphone. I can not record loud situations because the microphone distorts. This is my biggest fault with the Slide HD. I was a little concerned with the new Flip Ultra HD that it would have the same problem even though it uses a different microphone, but what really sold me on this new Flip was the accessories and the FLIP PORT.



Right off the bat I noticed all of the new accessories that they are pushing for the Flips, the aquapacks, the igo chargers, and my favorite is the magnetic Bower Wide Angel Lens. Flip and Cisco have finally started listening to its customers, but what put it over the top for me was Blue Microphones. Blue Microphones makes vintage and out of this world recording, studio, usb microphones. I own one of their USB Microphones called the Snow Ball and the quality of that microphone is amazing. When I found out that Blue Microphones was making a microphone (mikey) for the new Flip to be used with the new Flip Port, I purchased mine right away.



So the Review...



The Ultra HD has always been my favorite because of its size. I think the bigger it is the better control you will have and the less shaky video you will produce. The new Ultra HD is smaller, but not that much. It feels good in your hands. The controls and the screen are in the same place. It is a nice fit in your hand.



I was very shocked at how well the image stabilization worked. If you have used a flip before this one you know that the slightest movement will create shaky video. You can tell that this one has image stabilization. It still can produce shaky video but it might take a big jolt to do it.



The 60 fps was great. It was much clearer video and with the image stabilization it made everything much smoother and clearer in the view finder, even in low light situations. I did check when I got home and the 60fps does import right into Final Cut Pro for editing without any compression. (Probably cause the videos are in MP4 format)



Overall I think this is the best Flip Camera out on the market. I like this one better than the Mino because of the touch screen controls. Sometimes pressing the touch screen controls on the Mino will cause the camera to shake.



I hope this review was helpful. Please feel free to leave comments or questions.



See my comparison of my Flip Cameras below.





Flip Mino HD - Good Microphone (2nd out of all of them), doesn't have as wide as a shooting angle as the Ultra's. Very small in the hand, at times hard to control.



Flip Ultra HD (2nd Gen) - Good Microphone (3rd out of all of them) Wide Angle for shooting, Feels good in the hand, sturdy, wont break if dropped. Double A batteries only last a few hours, rechargeable battery pack has short life span. Unit can get hot when charging - may even shut down.



Flip Slide HD - Poor Microphone (in loud situations) - its omni directional so it picks up all around the Flip not just in the front like the others. (4th out of all of them) Touch controls are better than the Flip Mino, however this has no hard buttons. The Slide does have the largest storage capacity and is second in video quality only to the new Flip Ultra HD.



Flip Ultra HD (3rd Gen Flip Port) - Widest Angle for shooting, feels the best in the hand, has the Best Microphone and currently I believe has the best video quality. This also is the only unit that has the new Flip Port.





Thanks



Nick Flip UltraHD Video Camera - Black, 8 GB, 2 Hours (3rd Generation) NEWEST MODEL'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


16gb Sdhc Memory Card


I received this item as a gift since I love taking pictures and HD video. All of that can really eat up space quickly, so I was glad I got a SDHC card.



I've used many other amazon basic items like HDMI cables and other electrical cords, and they've all served me well, so I didnt worry about a amazon branded SDHC card. For all I know, they're probably made on the same assembly line as a big brand name card like SanDisk or PNY.



Write speeds, they're quick. My old camera used to make me wait 2-3 seconds after taking a photo, and waiting for it to write on my old old SanDisk 2GB SD card. Now after using this, instantly, I can shoot more photos and videos without needing to wait for it to write to the card.



Read speeds are pretty quick, all my pictures and videos showed up within seconds. My old Sandisk would make me sit there for a minute or two while it read each image and created preview icons for them in windows.



I highly recommend it to anyone who's into photography or just likes to shoot tons of videos/photos. I tend to copy everything and save it on my computer when the card starts to get full, but if you're the type of person who saves it all on SD cards for a long time, you might opt to get a 8 or 16GB card instead. AmazonBasics 16GB Class 4 SD Flash Memory Card

The card certainly has capacity to spare, even shooting RAW files. However, like many of you I enjoy taking photographs at sporting events and that is where the difference between a class 4 card and a class 6 card (which I have several of) shows up.



The slower writing speed on the class 4 card, and slower transfer speed when off-loading the images to my computer, is disappointing ~ enough so that I will sacrifice capacity for enhanced speed when making future purchases.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Electric Razor - shaving, norelco


I owned a Norelco Rotary Shaver for about 8 years. It was working fine until the rechargeable battery would no longer hold a charge. I would have replaced it myself - but I don't know how to solder, so I broke down and ordered the Braun Series 3 340 foil shaver. I had done a little research and most of the "experts" all suggested that foil shavers shave closer than rotary shavers. Obviously, razor blades have the "closest" shave, but I wanted the convenience of an electric shaver. I do not have a thick beard - anything but. I only shave once every 3-4 days so I end up w/ long whiskers in spots vs. 5 o'clock shadow that some people get after an hour :)



Anyway, the Braun Series 3 is a beautifully constructed shaver - but it didn't work very well. It took many passes to cut my facial hair...and then I had to work it from different angles to successfully shave off the hair at different parts of my face. Yes, it finally shaved - but it seemed to take so much longer. In the end, I just wasn't impressed at all - so I returned it for a refund.



After a week or so, I purchased the Norelco 8240XL rotary shaver. It is not as nice looking as the Braun - and certainly doesn't feel as well constructed - but it shaved me beautifully the first time around. The trimmer works so-so, but I didn't really buy it for the trimmer. The 8240XL cleans easily. The only thing wrong with the 8240XL package is the travel case. The travel case only holds the shaver - and does not allow for the brush and charging cord. How cheap is that? Norelco really should include a larger case to accommodate the cord.



I give the 8240 XL 5 stars as a shaver....and 1 star for the case. 4 overall only because the shaver outweighs the case. I'd recommend this product. Philips Norelco Speed 8240 Men's Shaving System

The Norelco 8240 offers the best value/comfort/performance for the money I've found. Lower models in the Norelco line lack some very effective features (floating heads, multiple inset rotary heads, etc.), while higher models are much more expensive with no benefit to performance (some do a poorer job of shaving, including the ARC series).



Although the best foil shavers generally shave closer, the Norelco 8240 cuts nearly as close (not quite, but the difference is virtually unnoticeable). The rotary heads, however, are MUCH more comfortable and not nearly as prone to razorburn as foil shavers. The floating heads on this model are excellent (not as stiff and MORE effective than the $130 ARC series), conforming well to my face, even at my sharp chin and gentle adam's apple.



Here is what makes it really superb compared to any other shaver I've tried in my 18 years of shaving:



- The $80 price (at Walmart, December 2009), on the low end of the price range that consistently offers the best value/performance ratio ($70 - $110).



- The motor is wonderfully quiet... it purs in a low, comforting tone, without the high whine of most other rotary and foil razors I've tried (the ARC series is much louder, as are Braun foil shavers). When I first used it, I though the battery must be low on charge, but I finally realized that it really is just that quiet all the time.



- The shaving performance is excellent: It offers the 2nd closest shave I've had from an electric shaver (The Braun foil shaver I've used for the last 6 years shaves negligibly closer), yet gives almost zero razorburn to my sensitive/dry skin (the Braun gave mild to moderate razorburn daily). Better yet, the Norelco shaves close WITHOUT need to pull my skin tight with a second hand as I shave. That is the main reason I switched back to rotary... Foil shavers only give a close shave by constantly pulling the facial skin tight with another hand while shaving.



- The ergonomics are very comfortable: It fits perfectly in my hand and feels very light. My Braun foil shaver always felt like holding a large cell phone... no ergonomics to speak of, which occasionally led to dropping it.



I'm convinced that negative reviews of this razor are either by folks with very strange face shapes or, more likely, folks who don't understand that a razor MUST BE BROKEN IN for about two weeks before it offers an optimum shave. On the first shave, the Norelco 8240 is unimpressive, but by the fifth or sixth morning (assuming you use it exclusively), it will adjust to your face and give you a remarkably good shave. The quality continues to improve slightly until about the end of the second week. Stick with it, and you'll be glad. - Shaving - Philips - Norelco - Electric'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Support System For Pontoon Covers


when I first got this product it was really cool and it worked okay. The problem was (even using the grey pvc) is that the pvc pipes would become permanently bowed which was okay however, when it rained hard and the water pooled up on the tarping in between the ribs the pvc pipe would shift and then invert. My cover was good and water proof so it turned into a pool liner (yikes)... I made weep holes in my tarp and that helped some. It is a decent low cost solution but it didn't turn out as well as I had hoped it would. I think there is a solution of drilling holes in the pvc and running a stabilizer bar or something to stabilize it from shifting then inverting but I was worn out with it by then plus I am not that crafty. For the price it's okay and it is really a cool idea. I don't use it anymore. Standard Arch Support System for Pontoon Covers

When we purchased this system we were surprised to see that the (Arches) PVC was not included. After contacting the seller and receiving a very quick response, we understood why. We installed the arches today and put our cover on. Before the bad weather hits we will put a larger more substantial cover on. For now, this works great. We will see how it holds up to the winter winds and snow, but it sure looks and feels sturdy enough. Installation was easy and took very little time.

The cost of the unit was more than reasonable including the PVC. We were quite impressed with the results.

I originally saw this item at Brass Pro Shop and it was priced two brackets for $19.99. I found the sysytem available at Amazon for a much better price! The Pontoon Boat Cover "Arch" Support System works very well I would recommend it to anyone with a pontoon but. Alot of covers will hold rain and this arch system eliminates this problem. Great value and very functional.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Support System For Pontoon Covers Support System For Pontoon Covers Support System For Pontoon Covers

Architects - parker, lamy


This pen is very comfortable to hold, it's got a "form" to it... it's not just a straight tube. It just feels right.

This pen worked flawlessly right out of the box. Even after an extended time of non-use (about 2 months), when I used it again, it started writing almost immediately, and once it started writing, it worked flawlessly.



A while back I bought a Lamy fountain pen to write letters to my daughter, Beth. It was to only be used prior to her getting married... and only on special paper chosen for only that use. In comparison, the Lamy pen is complete junk.



I bought this fountain pen for the sole purpose of writing letters to the young man (Corey) who was about to marry my daughter. I swore to use the pen only during the time leading up to the wedding... and I did.



2 weeks ago they got married. At the reception I destroyed both pens. Now it's time to buy a new pen, which will only be used to write letters to my son-in-law and his wife, my daughter.



I think I'll be buying another Parker Urban Premium Chiseled Medium Point Fountain Pen... the color is yet to be determined... but it can't be black... That was Corey's Pen's color.

Parker Urban Premium Chiseled Medium Point Fountain Pen, Metallic Black (1774704) Parker Urban Premium Chiseled Medium Point Fountain Pen, Metallic Black (1774704) - Pen - Fountain Pens - Parker - Lamy'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Architects - parker, lamy fountain pens Architects - parker, lamy

Charger - cable, charger


This was a perfect solution for my needs, one 30-pin connector provides only for charging and the other 30-pin connector for syncing and charging. I often use an iPad or iPod not linked to my computer/iTunes so the second power only connector is ideal as I can charge two devices simultaneously and do not have the annoying messages regarding the devices being synced to a different library. Dual iPhone / iPod Splitter Cable. Charge up to Two Apple Devices At Once From a Single USB Port

My husband and I keep this in our kitchen and it allows us to

charge both of our iPhones simultaneously when we walk in the house.

With our iPhones and iPods, having a good quality multi-cable is very

convenient. Thanks!

I think the people having problems with this cord are hooking it up to an inqdequate power supply. It is not the cord's fault it is the fault of the power supply.



Can't beat the price compared to what you would pay in the stores for a piece of wire and some plastic bits.



Amazon delivered on time, as usual.

I received my new dual sync cable today and am happy to report that it works just fine. Quality of the cable may be slightly less than the original Apple cables... seems like I just may need to connect and disconnect carefully. However, the connections do work fine and I was able to charge both my iPhone 4 and iPad with both the charge and sync cables... and the one designated sync cable successfully synced both phone and pad. Biggest downside for me is the cord length which is shorter than you'd expect for a specialized cable. Other than that, glad I went ahead and purchased and ignored some of the other bad reviews which I see now were false and probably made by more technically challenged individuals :)

I was really excited to get this because having an iPad and iPhone I really wanted to reduce cord clutter. After about 5 min of charging both devices suddenly start going nuts. Charging, not charging,charging then not. It's as if you plugged and unplugged super fast. Needless to say the chirping and vibrating gets your attention. The USB charge adapter gets very hot so I am assuming this is the problem. Might work ok if you were just plugging into a computer USB port. Did not try or want that. - Iphone - Charger - Ipod Cable - Cable'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


ipod cable Charger - cable, charger

Exercise - fitness ball


I got this workout ball because I have cats and every time I've gotten one in the past the cats seem to be able to pop them with their claws. This one is great because it can't be popped and it just feels sturdier. The only problem I have with it is that I am exactly 5'6 and it is on the small side for me. So I would recommend that if you are on the edge of what they recommend for size, go the one step bigger otherwise you will regret it. Thera-band Yellow 45cm Slow Deflate System Pro-Series Anti-Burst Exercise Ball - For Body Height 4' 7" - 5'

I purchased this ball in the 55 cm size (red). This size seems ideal for my height (just shy of 5'5"), although choice of ball size is also a matter of personal preference. Unlike my previous ball, which was made of a thin, sticky vinyl, this ball is made of thick durable, smooth plastic. Furthermore, my previous ball lost air easily (I had to add air to it every time I used it), whereas I have NEVER had to add air to this ball since I purchased it almost two years ago. It is definitely worth the investment to pay a little more for a ball that is high quality and will never any maintenance, and so I highly recommend this product.

Love it! My physical therapist had me using one while in PT, & I just bought one to continue the good work. If I have it around the house, I'm much more likely to actually do the exercises that I know I need to do, & I can do them whenever a commercial comes on during TV shows. It's sturdy, easy to inflate/deflate. I just took it on a trip out of state for aweek-long conference, & it really was easy to pack. Once @ the hotel, I asked @ the desk clerk if anywhere on site there was a bike pump, & it turned out they had a compressor that blew it up lickety-split, to just the firmness I needed. So I was able to do my exercises just as if I were @ home, & without carrying bulky or heavy exercise equipment along.

The Theraball brand exercise ball is one of the best on the market. Many physical therapists use them because of their very high quality. I just bought the 55cm ball and also own a 65cm one, which I've had for over a year.



The product holds the air well once it is inflated - so it is not one you have to keep inflating! It is good to know that it is an "anti-burst" ball too.



I had such a good experience with IsoKinetics, the seller on Amazon, that I just placed another order with them for a shoulder pulley. I got the product in record time and there was good communication from them on when the order was received and when it was shipped. Their shipping costs were also reasonable. Everything was packaged well. I ordered a pump and some Therabands at the same time and everything was great. Order from them with confidence!

When I was a personal trainer, I used these with my clients. Fantastic product. The only thing is, I disagree with their sizing chart. I think you out to go with a size or two smaller than the height chart calls for. You want your knees to be bent at a 90 degree angle when you are sitting on the ball to allow for maximum benefit and full range of motion (if you're going to actually be using the ball to exercise, and not just bounce on when you're bored).

I bought two of these Thera Band exercise balls. My electric air pump would inflate them 10-15cm (in diameter) short of the target size. I was afraid I might burst the ball. After some hunting online, we learned we needed to use an air compressor. It worked like magic.



I would disagree with the other reviewers who claim the balls aren't big enough. They are, but you need an air compressor. This is a very high quality product, much thicker than my previous exercise ball.

I originally recieved a defective product, but the customer service perople were very helpful and immediately sent me out antother ball (before I returned the first one). The second ball inflated easily to the true size described and it is very sturdy. I am pleased with this purchase and would recommend this product.

The Theraband exercise ball is the highest quality ball I have purchased. The only negative is the initial stiffness of the ball. After inflating the ball, it was pretty hard for the first few weeks, making crunches somewhat uncomfortable. In the long run, however, once completely broken in, I think this ball will prove its worth.

When I received this item and had my husband inflate the ball, we found that the air valve was defective. I called customer service and they immediately shipped out a replacement ball along with a postage paid label for me to return the defective ball. The new ball is just fine, and is suited to my height. Overall, I am very satisfied with it and with the company that sent me the ball. - Fitness Ball'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Exercise - fitness ball fitness ball Exercise - fitness ball

Sticky Notes - bookmark, post-its


I love post it arrows. I keep some in my desk, my computer bag, and in my bum roll. They're great for bookmarks and for 'tabbing' pages in books that you are going to use again and again. I would not have made it through some of my grad school classes without tabbing the APA manual for certain footnote styles.



The great thing is when you are done with the arrow, just toss it. They don't mar the page, but they stay where you put them, unlike my traditional bookmarks which get stolen by my cat and put in my bed at 3:00 AM.



Rebecca Kyle, October 2008 Post-it Arrow Flags, 1/2-inch, Ideal For Marking And Flagging Paper Documents, 4 Assorted Colors, 96 Flags per Dispenser (684-ARR4)

I also thought I was getting 4 packages of these flags, but just got one with 4 different colored flags. Not sure if that was the intent or not. Although I would have paid the same price at Office Depot, free shipping saved me a trip to the store and waiting in line for an item that I did not need immediately.

Buyer be aware that this is really only 1 pack of four colors. Before I ordered it I felt that the offer was too good to be true. The list price was 14.19 and it was being offered for 6.35. Shipping was free. It came quickly but I could have got the same thing at any office supply store for the same net price. - 3m - Bookmark - Post-it - Post-its'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Sticky Notes - bookmark, post-its 3m Sticky Notes - bookmark, post-its

Mp3 Cell Phone Accessories - headphones, mp3 cell phone accessories


It's seems (from reading the reviews) that there is some confusion about the 3 rings on 2.5mm jacks.



I notice that nobody has commented on how well this adapter works with their headset/microphone! Here is the deal; you do NOT need 3 rings for stereo! (left channel + right channel = stereo) hence two rings, plus the common ground (the tip on all jacks)to create stereo.



The 3rd ring is for a standard classic over the head, or in the ear, WIRED HEADSET with microphone, like this one:KX-TCA60 commonly used on home cordless phones. But also work on your cell phone! (with the above adapter)



A generally MUCH BETTER sounding alternative to your lost bluetooth, or the one that needs charging that you can't use right now. BTW, although a wire can be a pain sometimes, you can't beat the price, sound quality, and always ready to go device. (quality varies by model)



Here is where it gets a little tricky. Some cell phones, like Motorola, and others have a slightly different 3 ring configuration. That is probably why some customers here have been having trouble getting stereo sound.



So assuming the product itself is not defective, it is more likely your model phone is the problem. You will need to check with the manufacturer to be sure.



last thoughts: I'm constantly misplacing my bluetooth, or forgetting to charge it. These inexpensive headsets are a "must have" for us folks that can't stand holding that cell phone up to our ear all day. Or a safer way to talk when driving (where allowed) when a bluetooth is not available. PLUS they are interchangeable with cordless land lines, and you do not need to "pair" your device! 2.5mm (Male) To 3.5mm (Female) Stereo Audio Jack Adapter

I have a Huawei Ascend android phone and one of its few downfalls is that 2.5mm headphone jack. After trying Best Buy, Radio Shack, Guitar Center (i was desperate) and a few other places I finally found the correct adapter here at Amazon. If you have this phone. This is the correct adapter. It works fine and sounds good. Seems a little fragile but does what it's suposed to do. Thank you Amazon.

I ordered one of these so I could use decent headphones with my new palm centro, but the sound was only mono. I assumed I had a defective unit, but the seller informed me that the centro works with a two-band (a.k.a. 2-ring) plug. I doubted this at first because I have a 3-band stereo headset with a mic that works in stereo (with so-so sound), but after a good bit of web research I have learned that the circuitry in the centro makes use of the three bands when switching between stereo and phone mode. For plain stereo listening you'll need a two-band adapter. A waste of ~$6 for me, but hopefully I'll spare others!

After much research I decided to order this adapter for my LG Voyager and it works perfect. Much cheaper than Verizon's adapter which sells for around $13. The 3 ring is the one you need for this phone.

I have an LG enV 2 and this allows me to play it into standard headphones and to play it into my home stereo using the common RCA adaptor. Combined with an 8GB micro SD card, the phone is now a great mp3 music source. Three ring is indeed the proper converter for the LG.

I wish there was a list of compatible devices shown for this adapter. Nokia does not sell a jack adapter with E71 so I tried this one. Sounds only mono, even though the original 2.5mm is a three-ring jack. As another reviewer noted, I should try a two ring one.

If you have an Env3, as I do, do not purchase this item. It only works in the left earphone, and that is if you fiddle around with it and get lucky. Otherwise, it doesn't work at all. Also, if you partially unplug the 3.5mm end from the adapter, you may or may not get stereo sound (both earphones), but the sound is extremely tinny and hollow sounding. Do not purchase this item.



EDIT (8/24/2011): I recently upgraded to an LG Octane, which is basically the sequel to the Env3, so I thought I would try this out. It performs the same as on the Env3, which I guess is to be expected.

I have ordered this type of item before and it worked great until I lost it. So I ordered 2 more. these are not worth the materials they are made of. Both do not wolk correctly. you have to pull eth 3.5MM male out until you can hear from both head phones. This was true with differnt head phones and devices. This was the same for both items. do not waste your money on this product search for another.

I bought this to replace a lost adapter for use with my old Samsung Juke because I use it as an mp3 player at the gym but this thing doesn't work. The problem is with the adapter not the phone or the headphones because I'm using the exact same pair I've been using forever. Waste of my $4.00 because this is going in my junk drawer. If Amazon would let me give it zero stars I would - Adapter - Mp3 Cell Phone Accessories - Jack - Headphones'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Mp3 Cell Phone Accessories - headphones, mp3 cell phone accessories mp3 cell phone accessories Mp3 Cell Phone Accessories - headphones, mp3 cell phone accessories

Kenneth Cole Belt - excellent, kenneth cole


This belt fits all of my needs! I wear it with my dress clothes almost exclusively every day. After over 6 months of use, the belt surface still shows little/no wear and still shines like it is new. The only complaint that I have is that the leather surface is slightly separating from the backing around the edge closest to the hole I use most. This was easily fixed with a dab of super glue though! Go Kenneth Cole! Kenneth Cole REACTION Men's Waldorf 1-1/2" Reversible Leather Belt, Black/Brown, 32

After a few wearings, the belt started to separate (the black side from the brown side) in the center of my back, where there would usually be a slight dip after the belt stretched out. Instead, it kinked a little bit and started to separate.

As several other reviewers have noted, this belt separates in the middle after a couple of months. If you must replace it once every four months, might as well buy something more expensive that lasts longer.

This belt does not really have two distinctive colors, but rather black and almost black. It also has a distinctive fastening system that seems to work and to be robust as well. Finally, it seems a bit plasticized rather than seeming like leather. But it works, and is attractive enough.

What can I say, it's a belt. If you want a timeless and fashionable belt that is also sturdy, you cannot go wrong with this purchase. On one occasion, I was forced to remove my belt and use it as a connector between two heavy objects and STILL it hasnt warped, nor does it look like it will. My one complaint, it would seem that the leather was painted and not dyed as the edges are beginning to chip, but that's not an issue for me as seeing that area of the belt is impossible. If it really came down to it, I could take a sharpie marker and redo the edges.

The leather feels supple and soft. The buckle design is cool. I received compliments on the belt.



No problems to report.





Update - When I first received the belt and the first several times I wore it, I was happy with it.



But after wearing the belt several times using both sides, it has separated right in the middle between the black and the brown sides. Since it is out of the return time window, Amazon won't do anything. It is cheaply put together and comes apart easily. I have owned other reversible belts in the past, but Kenneth Cole Reaction is the only one that has separated, especially so soon in use.

The belt is really good though I cant wear it because its too small. Im going to sell it to a friend. I bought the 34 size since thats my size in american eagle jeans, you may want to at least buy one size bigger. Also the brown size is really dark so it makes it look like is black on both size if you wear it at night. If you are looking for a reversible belt you may want to look at a different option.

I bought this belt 2 months ago. The belt is great at first, but after a while the two leather pieces will begin to separate and you'll end up with two fully separated leather strips. I came here to buy a second (identical) belt thinking mine was an oddity, but seeing that other customers complain too I'll look for another model. - Excellent - Kenneth Cole Belt - Kenneth Cole - Buckle'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Kenneth Cole Belt - excellent, kenneth cole buckle Kenneth Cole Belt - excellent, kenneth cole

Nano Black - dock, ipod


Three Way Comparison, Bose SoundDock vs. Griffin Amplifi vs. Altec Lansing IM600:



Design and Features:



Bose Sound Dock: Cabinet made of plastic. Appears to have two 2.5" acoustic suspension (enclosed) drivers under a metallic grill, with a whole bunch of added physical structures that look to be waveguides and / or signal processors. Bose keeps details on this pretty much obscured, but wattage estimates I've seen on the net put power output at roughly 50-60 watts and based on my own comparative experience, I would agree. Some commentators think the unit has four drivers rather than two, but I see only two beneath the grill and I am not going to disassemble the unit. Some Bose haters on the net claim frequency response on the SD is capped at a mere 10,000 kHz, which I personally doubt, as treble rich music I've played on this sounds fine, and no reliable net source makes this claim. Ipod docks in a front-mounted bay. My 5.5 G 30 GB feels rather loosely supported, but no major issues.



No line-in or out. Indeed, no console controls at all except a volume up and volume down button. Simple remote, though very reliable and with good range. The power wart is bizarrely large and bulky, plus is also in two sections, making it seem like you're going to be powering up a railgun or supercollider rather than a relatively low powered music player. The design is sturdy and attractive overall, but the lack of any special features whatsoever is dismaying, perhaps symptomatic of Bose's condescending "electronics for idiots" philosophy. Charges Ipod as long as it is docked, when playing or when off.



Griffin Amplifi: Cabinet made of wood, looks like small shoebox. Has two 2.75" drivers front mounted and a bottom mounted 5" woofer with a bass port. Griffin in the worst Bose tradition refuses to disclose many tech statistics on their unit, but my power estimate puts this at about 30-40 watts, not really much different from the Bose. (To sound twice as loud needs a 10 times (1000%) increase in wattage, so the Bose advantage of maybe 33% more power should not really give much real world benefit.) Frequency response per mfgr is 50-16,000 kHz which seems a bit unbelievable on the low end, but feasible enough on the higher end. Ipod docks on top and sticks awkwardly out of the unit like a control tower, but fit is snugger than on Sound Dock which makes me feel more reassured.



There is a line-in and not much more. Big blue-lit knob controls on-off and volume. Remote is a copy of the Bose's with the same simple functions. Range and aiming tolerance is inferior to both the Bose and the Altec, but certainly adequate. Annoyingly, the Amplifi only charges an Ipod docked in it when the Amplifi is on; if the Ipod is docked and the Griffin is turned off, no charging. Either Griffin's engineers are idiots, or they decided to save a few pennies in the design.



Altec Lansing IM600: Smallest unit, with plastic cabinet and cool fold up dock that also has on / off switch. Has two 2" acoustic suspension drivers, and a separate subwoofer out line that I did not use. Also has video out and line-in ports, plus a decent FM tuner and telescoping antenna. Tons and tons of features in comparison to our other competitors. Plus unit has an internal rechargeable battery which lasts for roughly 7 hours, and an "SFX" stereo expander DSP switch. Altec is honest enough to give the power stats on the unit of 14 watts. Though this is less than either other dock, as stated above the actual volume difference is not reflected in the numbers. Frequency range is not specified, but it seems to go as high as either of the other competitors, with perhaps less bass extension. Front mounted dock that gently leans the Ipod against a reinforced acoustically neutralized spot on the unit so vibrations will not affect the Ipod during playback.



IM600 also has a beautiful backlit display which stays lit while the unit is plugged in to AC power. The Altec charges Ipods as long as there is an AC connection, whether or not the Altec is turned on. The IM600 does not charge Ipods when the dock is running on its own rechargeable battery. The remote is also IR like the others in the test, and is somewhere between the Bose and Griffin in terms of range and responsiveness. Remote lets you control SFX mode and access four radio presets. (Though if you lose the remote, you will have no preset control at all, so try not to do that.)



Sound:



Bose: Excellent deep bass, controlled and accurate, never boomy. Mid-range is emphasized, so guitars and vocals sound especially fine. Treble appears a bit less impressive, but trebly stuff like Vivaldi and Tallis sounds just fine. The Bose sounds better with rock and jazz than with classical, but not dramatically so. The Bose sounds equally good at both low and high end, and the unit can be played at max volume with no distortion, probably due to Bose's manipulation of the source signal. Nevertheless, the Bose sounds very good at all volumes and with virtually any type of music. The Bose can also fill up any small or medium room with sound, and can even be a decent sound system for a reasonably quiet large room. Stereo separation was the best of all three speakers, unimpressive when compared to a formal stereo with speakers a couple of yards apart, but certainly very much a feat from speakers separated from each other by less than a foot. Detail is excellent with many-layered music like works by Nine Inch Nails and Dead Can Dance being expertly and precisely performed.



I am no fan of Bose, finding the sound from their home theater systems to be artificial, inaccurate, compromised, pricey, and over-hyped. However, in the case of the SoundDock, with the goal of creating generally acceptable sound from lossy sources, Bose has executed the concept impeccably well. The music as played may not be dead-on accurate, but it is not noticeably deficient and sounds loud, detailed, and clear at any volume. Kind of like McDonald's fries, the SoundDock is by far the jewel in the rather uneven portfolio of Bose equipment. Even if you hate the idea of Bose, or have disliked their other audio products, the SoundDock may well amaze you.



Griffin: Bass is about as good as the SoundDock, maybe lower extension, but roughly the same precision and balance. Griffin is to be commended for not going crazy and letting the big 5" woofer run roughshod over the sound of the Amplifi. The big woofer does not make the Amplifi sound better than the Bose at the low end, but on the other hand it doesn't sound worse, and it is also much cheaper. Griffin was not aiming to beat the Bose here, but rather to equal it with a lower price and simpler design. Mid-range is another strong point here, and treble is also a bit lacking, like in the Bose, but not too much so. Classical pieces still sound very good on the Griffin.



Where the Amplifi does lose ground to Bose is in the fancy stuff. Stereo separation is non-existent, and detail is nowhere near as precise as on the Bose. This sounds like a big loud mono speaker. Low volumes especially lose a lot of fine subtlety, and distortion is heard at the very highest volumes (though to be fair, no one would really play this unit that loud, as it is probably 100 dB or more.) The acoustically tuned all wood cabinet adds little to the sound signature of the Amplif vis a vis the plastic cabinet of the Bose. The lack of stereo separation, detail, and full clarity throughout all volume ranges is where the added cost of the Bose is most evident and justifiable. Most users will like the Griffin though; it mimics the sound signature of the Bose convincingly, has a retro wood cabinet design, and has at least one important feature that the Bose lacks, a line-in, all of this at a street value of 1/3rd of what the Bose goes for. This will make the Amplif a great solution for most users, especially those on a budget. However, the added price of the Bose does create a noticeably superior sound in at least some aspects.



Altec Lansing: The IM600 takes a different path than its rivals, aiming for a more treble oriented sound, with adequate bass and very good mids. The IM600 sounds crisp and detailed, but lacks the low end punch of the Bose or Griffin. The 600 has a separate subwoofer out line and a 3" sub is available separately from Altec Lansing for $50. No idea how it sounds. This is the best of these three units for classical music reproduction, but most music sounds fine on it. Even bass heavy music is more than acceptable for most listeners; you just don't feel the low end as prominently as you do with the other two docks, but depending on your expectations, this may be just fine.



Stereo separation is not especially strong on the Altec, to be expected when the drivers are all of 7" apart. The SFX mode is helpful in this regard, and does give some stereo sound effect, and really does not hurt sound reproduction in any way, so I normally leave the effect on. Stereo is far more noticeable than the Griffin, but less pronounced than the Bose. (However, even the Bose offers far less stereo than one might get from properly placed PC satellite speakers, let alone a true home stereo system...) Clarity and detail on the IM600 is excellent, rivaling the Bose in many cases. Brass and drums sound a bit more real and crisp on the Bose, and this plus the better low end will give the nod to the SoundDock over the IM600 for most listeners, unless you listen to nothing but classical. The IM600 distorts a bit at maximum volume, but not terribly so. It sounds as good at low volumes as it does at normal (medium level) settings.



Value:



Bose: Normally listed at $300 and almost never discounted. The new "portable" SoundDock just came out as of this writing and sells for $400. If Bose can maintain this exceptionally high price for the newer model, SoundDock prices may stay at $300, but if the newer unit needs some price adjustment, the original SoundDock may fall in price (or even be discontinued.). I purchased my Bose as a reconditioned by the factory model for $250 and then caught a sale at the Bose store for an added 10% off, $225 total. I think Bose stores are the only place where you can get the "factory renewed" models for the lower price.



Griffin: List of $150, normally seen online at roughly $115-$125. I picked mine up at Circuit City for $100.



Altec Lansing: Listed at $150, seen online at $120-$130 average. I got mine from an Amazon vendor for $108.



Summary:



Bose: Probably not worth $300, the price I paid of $225 feels like about what the SoundDock is worth. The sound is audibly better quality here, though probably not two to three times better than the Griffin or the Altec, which is what the pricing would indicate. The lack of a decent feature set makes the Bose seem like even less of a value. Again though, if style, quality, simplicity, and excellent sound is your goal, and price does not matter that much, the Bose is a fine choice. Special note to all the Bose haters: take a listen to this before lumping it in with such atrocities as the Acoustimass and StereoEverywhere technology. The SoundDock sounds unusually good, does not mangle realism of the sound unpleasantly, and is really the cutting edge of what can be done with reproducing Ipod sound from a small one-piece unit.



Griffin: Aims for the SoundDock's sound signature, and generally succeeds. Lacks a bit of polish in both physical and sonic characteristics, but overall is an excellent value. If you want Bose, but can't afford it, the Amplifi will not leave you with many regrets. The wooden cabinet and big bass driver are not utilized very distinctively, but there are no glaring missteps here either. However, if you can afford the SoundDock, the Griffin has no real advantages as its clone philosophy and minimal feature set offer no advantage over Bose except cost. The bigger and better sound of the SoundDock justifies the added cost as long as price is not the main consideration.



Altec Lansing: The excellent design, wonderful feature set, and portability of this unit distinguishes and separates it from the other two. Sound is generally well done, crisp and appealing, and the treble emphasis gives the Altec its own sonic niche. The power difference in watts is not really noticeable except if you are trying to fill up a big room with sound, and why would you be doing that with a wee tiny Ipod dock anyway? Most users will be very happy with the IM600's sound and the quality FM tuner is just the icing on the cake. If you are on a budget, I would say get the Altec as it sells for roughly the same price as the Amplifi, and has many more features including portability. The IM600 has somewhat less bass than the Griffin, but better stereo sound and detail clarity. Bose SoundDock digital music system for iPod (Black) - Sounddock - Dock - Ipod Speakers - Ipod'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Nano Black - dock, ipod sounddock Nano Black - dock, ipod