Sunday, 3 July 2011

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom


Those familiar with Photoshop might wonder why an additional product should be needed to manage digital images. I would offer this difference: Photoshop is a program for image manipulation; it's for folks who want to change their photographs or create new substance in an image. Lightroom is a program that, primarily, expedites photography workflow. [By using the term "workflow," I don't mean to imply that it's geared only to those who are in the profession of photography; amateurs and hobbyists alike (like I am), who also wish to prepare quickly and print images, can benefit from this highly-practical and time-efficient program.] You can "tweak" pics very nicely with Lightroom, but Photoshop's the paragon for substantial alteration.



Lightroom 3 simplifies enormously the process of preparing photo captures for use, whether as web or print applications. It facilitates quick organization & preview, raw enhancement, printing, and web uploading of photos.



The "library" module permits quick organization of picture groups. The amazing, work-saving catalog system allows rapid naming, labeling & flagging, copying, metadata editing & review, and filtering of files, then presents a robust preview for easy access to the rest of the photographic workflow. A stellar feature of the file handling is the (relatively) low memory burden placed on computer RAM -- most all of these activities originate from small files that make good use of the .dng formatting.



The "develop" module contains all of the necessary controls to adjust exposure, correct lens aberrations, establish a good white point to remove color casts, manipulate color and grayscale attributes, crop, retouch discreet areas of a photo, and, generally, to perform all the actions of an after-the-fact camera, insofar as these are possible, to improve the raw (proprietary or .dng) images that come from a digital source. White point color correction is particulary easy - and requires only a few skillful mouse motions (as opposed to Photoshop, in which color correction is either mindlessly automated or involves multi-step curve adjustments). One very fine feature in Lightroom is the ability to create instantly a "virtual copy" of your photo, which you can edit, change, enhance, etc. -- all without altering your original file.



The "slideshow" module lets you combine photos into a presentation for automatically viewing a sequence of photos as slides. Text can be added, as well as an intro slide and a conclusion slide. You can even add a music file to the background of your presentation, and the program will automatically time your slideshow to the length of your music clip. Slideshows can then be downloaded into a variety of different video formats (including mp4, which I use most frequently).



Finally, the "print" or "web" modules expedite the last-step output to the desired final product. There's a marvelous preview of your photo presented prior to the actual printing. Multiple photos or copies of the same photo can be easily grouped and previewed on a single sheet for cost-effective printing. Downloading to the web is a cinch. There's even a feature to upload your photos automatically to a Flickr account and (in the updated version) to Facebook.



Though a learning curve is associated with attaining mastery of Lightroom, I think the controls are quite intuitive. As a virtual neophyte who has had the product for only a short time, I've been able to output some very satisfying images to my printer.



I've been an Adobe fan since the dark ages of computer imagery in the 1980's [Pagemaker license number was issued by Aldus], and this product once again confirms their hegemony in the realm of computer graphics.



Conclusion: Lightroom 3 is a highly recommended program for those who like to snap and publish digital photos. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3

I'll start off by saying I thought $300 for a photo program was more than I wanted to spend. I had tried the 30 day trial when LR2 came out, but couldn't get in enough keyboard time during the 30 day trial period. I decided to try the Beta when LR3 B1 came out and actually got about 70 days under my belt before B2 expired.

I had bought and used Elements 3 and 7, and while pretty good enhancers, there organizational abilities were weak. By weak, I mean, once they were catalogued and or key worded, they were fine, but the key wording was tedious.



Enter LR3. It doesn't have the capability of Elements (or photoshop either, I assume) but it does have enough capability to handle 90+% of what I do. What I usually do is correct color and exposure, saturate or desatureate some colors to enhance the image or de-emphasize the back ground, sharpen things up a bit and or decrease noise, mostly luminous, and apply the lens correction feature. I have also used the curves feature and the section I think they call shade, saturation and Lumination to make local adjustment to brightness and color. All in all, I can make almost all reasonably exposed photos, (+-2.5 stops) look pretty good. The program doesnot have the capability to distort shape, color or texture for artistic purposes, which I do not do at this time. The program does have a perspective correction section which I have had reasonable success with on the small number of uses I have had with it.



I have dabbled in the other features, such as healingand red eye reduction (easy and effecetive), paint brushing, tinting etc. My experience here is limited, but the features seem to be effective.



Its real standout is organization. I had about 11,000 photos in my file which I reduced to about 8000 by using the easy to use "compare mode". I also keyworded these images in about 2 weeks of daily effort averaging 2 to 4 hours per day. ( a concentrated effort for sure). The keywords are easy to set up and the program's auto-type and table of recent keywords is very helpful and a great time saver.



In general, I say if your main goal is organization of your file, perhaps coupled with a desire for slide show, this program has a lot of features to consider, (I did not use the print or post to facebook sections at all). If you're into MAJOR image correction or enhancement, for artistic purposes, this program will fall short. I hope this helps.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Adobe Photoshop Lightroom

Dtv Converter Box - zenith, dtv


Of the tons of TV converter boxes that flooded the market in 2009 when the big switchover from analog to digital happened, this was the best.



Major advantages:



* Additive scan. Great for rescanning to find more channels, without losing your existing channels. Essential for anybody who uses an antenna rotator.

* Manual tuning, with signal meter. You can select a RF channel, even if it hasn't been scanned in yet. Also essential for use with a rotator.

* Solid software. Decodes all channels and subchannels, even "audio only" channels that confuse other boxes.



The disadvantages are few:



* No S-Video output.

* Remote control is small and feels cheap. Be gentle or you will break it.



Get this box, if you can. They are very hard to find these days. Zenith DTT901 Digital TV Tuner Converter Box

I now have three of these and all of them for a year or more. One does not work at all anymore and the other two have problems. When new, they seem to be quite good and have very good reception and picture quality. However, after awhile they start shutting down for no reason and need three or more restarts before staying on. This seems to get worse over time and sometimes they will need a power cord pull reset. One was used in my garage and these do not turn on if the temperature is around 30-40 or colder.

This is a very nice converter box. I can get more channels and the picture is perfect. One thing is the guide. I'd like to be able to scroll through a channel to see what is going to be on later in the day. Other than that its a great buy!

After dealing with these boxes (every TV in the house has to have one now) for over a year I've become accustomed to the features and how they work. This one was a breeze. It was easy to hook up and it programed itself. I've been using it for only a month but so far I'm quite satisfied.

I bought this to replace my Directv Tuner. This unit worked better then the HDTV Tuner Directv provided. Nice features for the price. Would be worth twice to three times as much if it came with component outputs and 5.1 audio. I would recommend this unit to everyone. Well worth the money.

My DTT901 changes channels by itself. It does this infrequently, but the frequency of occurrence is increasing. It does it when connected to antenna and VCR set to record in a room with no person or animal in the room at all. It changes down one channel, like from 13.2 to 13.1. Zenith says they have never heard of this condition before. I use it to record programs to the VCR when I cannot watch during the broadcast. It is annoying to have the channel change during my program recording.

Product worked fine for first few times I used it. Then it started acting up and now will not work at all. Very disappointed with product.

What bothers me the most is LG, the service company. They cannot seem to get their act together to send me a return/ repair form for the unit.

I would not recommend LG electronics for anybody.

I bought this box because of the reviews that claimed better reception over the competitors. I have 2 of these boxes and I have had mixed results. I use them in my RV and so I have had a number of chances to try them out in different locations. When I use them at my house the picture and reception have been amazing. I live in the suburbs and close to the broadcast towers on the mountains nearby. When I have traveled to other areas it has been spotty. I camped about 25 miles outside of Las Vegas and got nothing on the box. I have used them in Temecula, CA and got some channels but at times the picture was garbled and the I was only able to get 10 channels to come in clearly. I am using a Winegard antenna that is fixed to the top of the RV. I might change to a different version of antenna to see if I can improve the results. - Digital Converter Box - Dtv - Converter Box - Zenith'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Power Adapter - great, charger


I bought this product for my little sister who lost hers a while ago. I was a little suspicious to find this product at such a cheap price and it wasn't until I got it that I found that the company brand marked the the device was not Nintendo but rather "Nintondo". It was a little off putting but at the price I got it I wasn't complaining. I just wanted for sister to be able to charge her dsi and it does just that. Overall the shipping was fast, the price very low and the charger despite being a knockoff does what I need and have not had any problems with it so far. New AC Power Adapter Charger for Nintendo DSi NDSi

The DSI charger I bought lasted a total of three days before quitting. Its a good thing I ordered two. The second seems to be working still, after a month. They just don't make stuff like they used to.

This charger works perfectly. The only drawback is the cord is a little short for playing while charging. I did not really look into the cord length so that is my fault. You can't beat it for the price though. - Charger - Great - Adapters - Nintendo Dsi'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Travel Adapter - travel, electronics


I purchased this set for a trip to England. The adapter worked like a charm with several different electronic devices that I brought with me. I stayed in three different hotels in different parts of the country and never had any trouble whatsoever. Plug this into the wall, plug your device into this adapter, and you are good to go. It was just that easy and worked perfectly every time. The only thing you have to watch is that whatever you plug in can run on the foreign voltage or you'll need a transformer as well. Fortunately, most devices are now made to run on voltage ranging from 110 to 220 but you should always check just to be sure you don't short out anything. Lenmar AC5 World Travel Adapter Plug Set

Bought two pairs (for myself and a friend). I tried plugging in my cell phone charger and my generic iPod charger, and both fit well into all 5 of the adapters without sticking. I bought these for our trip to Europe (both Ireland/England and continental Europe). A bit cheap construction, but for the price on Amazon, it's worth it. I'll see how well they'll work on our trip, but I'm sure they'll work fine. If not, there's a 3 year warranty.



EDIT: After trip - these worked great in ALL the countries we visited for three weeks (Ireland, England, France, Italy, and Germany)!

This set was exactly what I needed for my business travel to Europe. The adaptors worked well for my laptop, BlackBerry, cell phone, and personal care accessories. Make sure all of your electronics can handle the 240 voltage over there before pluging them in because these adaptors do NOT step the voltage down! Most newer electronics and chargers are rated for the higher voltage and will be fine but be sure to check.

I'm sure that this is a fine adapter set, but be advised that it is ONLY an adapter set. Because the title lists the item as an adapter/CONVERTER, that's what I expected to receive. I feel that this listing is misleading when it says "Product Description

Lenmar AC Plug, Converter Set, 5 Piece, International". I suppose if I knew more about what I was purchasing, I could've seen by the picture that this was only an adapter set, BUT I don't know what a A/C converter is supposed to look like since I don't own one yet. I was relying on the words to guide me.



I am returning the adapter set to purchase one that includes a converter, so I cannot fairly rate this product for what it actually is. Since I had no choice, I assigned the adapter set 3 stars. I'm basing the low rating on the fact that the countries of use are not written directly onto the plugs. Who wants to keep the package and take it along on vacation?

If all you want is every adapter possible, this set is just fine and way cheaper than some of the fancy versions. It came really quickly and packaged well. I needed the British 3-prong one for Oman (don't believe that the whole middle east has only one kind of plug) and it was great. There isn't a converter with these, so be careful. I didn't need one b/c I only wanted to charge my iPod, camera, and phone which auto-adapt.

At first glance, these plugs had a very cheap feel to them (which slightly worried me), but they ended up being great. I just got back from a month long trip to Europe (used the europe/UK plugs), and these plugs worked great. I had no problems whatsoever. For the price, you'd be crazy not to pick them up!

We purchased these for our trip to Europe and they worked great. In London and Europe we used the skinny 2-pronged plug. The fat pronged plug didn't work. In London the 3-pronged plug also worked. Some outlets in England have the 3-prongs and some have the 2-prongs. Because most newer U.S. cords run on both 110 and up to 250 amps, we didn't have any need for converters. Check all of your plugs to see what they need. Our cell phones, laptop, camera, camcorder, I-pods, etc., all state on the plugs that they run on all currents. The only thing that didn't was my hairdryer. Instead of spending a ton of money on a converter I purchased a dual wattage travel hairdryer inexpensively, and took it with me. What I discovered was that the 220 volt current made the hair dryer run very fast, much more than it runs on our current. Most of the time I didn't need it anyway because the places we stayed at provided hair dryers.



That said, I found these to be well-priced and worth the purchase. - Travel - Adapter - Electronics - Converter'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Replacement Countertop Water Filters - water, water filter


I searched for the best water purification technique available primarily because I was shocked at the state of our drinking water and I couldn't just go on blindly dumping chemicals into my body. My criterion was to remove all added chemicals from my drinking water including Fluoride and as an Engineer with a scientific background I needed scientific backing.



Note: The usage of Fluoride in our water systems is controversial, but Ninety-seven percent of western Europe has eliminated fluoride from drinking water. goggle "Fluorosis" and "fluoride side effects", read the article on "about dot com" on "fluoride removal". Read the article on "livestrong dot com" on "side effects of fluoride ingestion". I quote, "Fluoride ingestion has been associated with adverse health effects such as IQ deficits in children, depression, weight gain and heart disease. The "Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics" reports that "high fluoride intake has a damaging effect on intellectual ability," and human studies from China, India, Iran and Mexico found that elevated levels of fluoride in children resulted in reduced performance and impaired development of intelligence. The U.S. National Research Council has also found that fluoride affects normal endocrine function, which may contribute to hypothyroidism, or reduced activity of the thyroid gland. Hypothyroidism can lead to fatigue, depression, weight gain, hair loss, muscle pains and heart disease.



I started off with on a friends recommendation the Nikken Pi-Mag which i soon rejected because they independent lab results were not available, fluorine was not removed from the water and I could not trust a MLM companies claims' that were not scientifically verifiable.



I looked at Aquasana and Multipure's product line but I became obvious that the life expectancy was about a year and I would deal with leaks, and defective housing. The reviews for the New Wave were 10Stage Filter were promising on amazon and I bought it right away, but soon grew suspicious of their claims as there were no results posted on their website either. I called New Wave customer service which I must add was great and friendly and asked for the independent lab results, which they emailed. After analyzing the results I was disappointed to see that a company that makes water filters provided results from a lab called, Truesdale lab but back in 1995 (15yrs ago!). Surely they can get this tested recently since both regulations and water quality have changed since then and made this readily available to their customers via their website. Anyway the results they provided showed that it was tested for Cyst Removal (based on the 1988 NSF standard), Lead, Choloform and Lindane removal. Fluorine was not removed which for me was not good enough.



I returned the New Wave Environ and finally found the Berkey filter system which has an additinal fluoride filter as well. Although more expensive (about 250 inclusive of a set of flouride filters), the Berkey filters would be cheaper in the long run as they last between 3,400 gallons to 19,500 gallons depending on water quality, unlike the New Wave Filter's 1500 gallons. Furthermore I liked openness and readily accessible lab results by independent labs such as the University of Arizona, LSU and Spectrum labs (google Berkey lab results). Furthermore they are used by emergency organizations like the Redcross and Unicef.



I must add that there is no perfect system, the fluoride filters usually use an activated alumina filter media and Aluminia has been associated with Alzheimers. I was concerned about any aluminum dust residue left in the water and a little more research revealed the residue to me negligible.



Here is a comparison:



Water boiled in an Aluminium pan for 5mins had: 2.791 ppm aluminum

Colgate toothpaste: 52.878 ppm aluminum.

The Berkey flouride filter after 10 cycles had .037 ppm aluminum and after 20 Cycles: .029 ppm aluminum which in my opinion was negligible and safe.



I hope this helps you and saves you time!

I purchased this filter about 3 months ago, so writing on 3 months of continual use.



I live in Sofia, Bulgaria, and the city water's a bit dodgy. For example: If you leave for a few days and come back, lot's of rusty colored brown water which pours out for the first minute or so of running the tap.



PROS:

Overall, I *love* the water filter:



It's easy to set up,

The water seems to come out pretty clean/tasty. I've been using various Brita filters in the past, and I prefer this one by far. It could be psychosomatic, just *thinking* that it's a bigger & beefier filter, but...

It's also convenient, no frequent filter changes and it takes up very little counter space. I also didn't like having to always remember to frequently change the Brita filters.



CONS:

The only downside is that the auto turn-off feature is a bit sketchy. Mine stopped working after 1 week. There's a small metal valve on the faucet that you pull out to get the water re-routed to the filter. When you turn off the faucet, this valve is supposed to automatically pop back into place (into the off position). The thing broke very fast (1 week, as mentioned), which is disappointing. Now, when the water faucet is turned off, I have to remember to manually push the valve back to the "off" position. There's a warning in the instructions that you shouldn't push it back into the "off" position when the water is still running (which I didn't do, but it still broke). However, now i just have to be mindful to push it back in when I'm finished using it. Not a big deal, but something to think about.



I'd give her 5 stars if the build quality of the valve was better!



-------

Update: I've been using the filter for over a year now (I'm on my second filter change), and it's still fantastic. I fill up 1.5 litre bottles every day to take to work (rather than waste buying plastic bottles), and it's great! Tastes good, and environmentally friendly! I changed my previous filter after the recommended 1 year, and the filter change went easy. Great product! - Water - Water Filter - Countertop Water Filters - Filter'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Car Chargers - blackberry charger, blackberry car charger


It looks like this company used to send OEM chargers but has stopped doing so. I also received a cheap knock-off instead of an OEM BlackBerry charger. For the price perhaps it is fine, IF that was what I had ordered. It was not. It is most certainly not what is pictured or described. Blackberry RIM OEM Car / Auto Charger, Cigarette Lighter Adapter for Blackberry 8300 Curve, 8310 Curve, 8320 Curve, 8330 Curve, 8350i Curve and Bold 9000 phone models

Don't buy it. It's not like the picture, Not OEM as the seller says. It's a real bad made in china aftermaket, very fake, very cheap. It was not even for Blackberry, it was for Motorora V3. Go to best buy or some store and get the real one. very dissapointed.

IDB is a great seller. Product works well! Charges phone. Initial unit did not charge phone even when indicator light glowed green as designed. Seller, IDB, called and sent a replacement quickly when initial product did not charge phone.

Side Benefit: Reception in marginal areas appears to improve probably due to charger wire improving the antenna effectiveness. - Blackberry Charger - Blackberry - Car Charger - Blackberry Car Charger'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


blackberry charger Car Chargers - blackberry charger, blackberry car charger

Stanley - digital timer, timers


WHOA! The Stanley 31206 TimerMax unit is packaged incorrectly. I confirmed this during a call to the customer service assistant. It does NOT have a "vacation mode" nor does it have a "manual override button" as advertised on the package and on Amazon.



This is what the timer DOES do:



- Allows the current time to be set in AM or PM hours and minutes

- Allows the time to be set in AM or PM hours and minutes when the timer outlet will turn ON

- Allows the time to be set in AM or PM hours and minutes when the timer outlet will turn OFF

- Repeats this program every 24 hours

- Battery backup (two LR44 Alkaline Button Cells included). Open the little battery drawer and pull out an insulator tab to activate.

- LCD screen with No back lighting. Displays the current time and displays the programmed ON and OFF times when the ON and OFF buttons are pressed respectively. Program can be set before plugging the timer into the outlet.

- The timer and its outlet are two-pronged polarized

- It is rated 120VAC/60Hz/5A/600W Tungsten & Resistive (Incandescent & Appliance); if the label on the timer can be believed

- When the timer turns the outlet OFF, the outlet is completely disconnected from power (see Wikipedia note below)



Not bad for a device that costs less than $8 (IMO). I would recommend it if there is no need for a vacation mode or there is no need to override the program to manually turn a device on and off.



My intention is to use the timer with a compact fluorescent lamp. Wikipedia includes the following interesting note: "Electronic (but not mechanical) timers can interfere with the electronic ballast in CFLs and can shorten their lifespan. Some timers rely on a connection to neutral through the bulb and so pass a tiny current through the bulb, charging the capacitors in the electronic ballast. They may not work with a CFL connected, unless an incandescent bulb is also connected. They may also cause the CFL to flash when off." With a lamp plugged into the timer and the timer set such that the bulb was Not lit, I removed the bulb and checked for voltage. The meter read zero. Then I checked with an ohm meter and there was no continuity. I put a non-dimmable CFL into the lamp and set the timer to turn it on and off. It worked fine. And even though I'm sure there is an incandescent bulb somewhere in the circuit, they/it are not switched on. Also, the CFL did not flash when the timer had the lamp off (as expected since there is no continuity).



The instructions that come in the package are not completely correct. While there is no reference to a "vacation mode", the instructions do refer to a non-existent "top switch" for a non-existent "Always On Mode". The instructions also state: "Be sure to charge the battery as noted above." Well, there is no "note above", and the included two LR44 Alkaline Button Cells are not rechargeable.



Also, the packaging includes the following warning: "PROP 65 WARNING: This product contains chemicals, including lead, known to the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects, and other reproductive harm. Wash hands after handling."



Hope this gives you enough info to decide if you want to purchase. Stanley 31206 TimerMax Indoor Digital Lamp Timer, White

Just got them. Very simple to program and gave them a test run at which they succeeded brilliantly. Bought them so when we go on the road we can have lights on and off in the house. I guess all this paranoia is finally taking its toll but like they say (who? I am not exactly sure) is better to be safe than sorry. I refrained from giving them a 5 because time will tell how well they perform and most important, how long they last before they work no more. Many products start at full speed but I noticed not all keep up the good work. For now, though, Stanley 31206 TimerMax Indoor Digital Lamp Timer, White are just what the doctor ordered! 4 Stars!

I got it almost six months ago and it has turned on and off my fish light every day. I am getting another one for my heater for my crabs since it only gets cold at night. A six year old could program it themselves without directions. It's extremely easy. I love it!

I bought 6 of these timers to run LED Christmas after my X10 timers failed to turn the LEDs off. These were very low cost. I didn't expect them to be so great. They have battery backup. They were easy to set. Performed very well. And the work properly with LED lighting. This was a great buy

Stanley might be a well-known company, but this product is sub-standard. No vacation mode, although the package advertises it - an incredible oversight. Also, when you press the manual over-ride buttons (there is not one button, but you have to press two simultaneously) the device does over-ride, BUT it does not revert back to the programmed on/off schedule once you delete the over-ride. You have to re-program it each time. Lame, and I would not recommend this to anyone.

I am so disappointed with this product. The name 'Stanley' has always meant quality to me, but now.... Yes it was easy to set up; yes it worked ...for a week. I decided to change the batteries. Removing them took some time. Once I bought new batteries ( and I put them in every which way I could figure) the timer still didn't work. So, no I wouldn't recommend this product to anyone. - Timer - Timers - Lamp Timer - Digital Timer'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Stanley - digital timer, timers digital timer Stanley - digital timer, timers