Sunday, 6 March 2011
Battery Charger - battery charger aa or aaa, rechargeable batteries
UPDATE: (03-26-2011) It has been more than 3 years since I wrote this review. This charger is still working great!
I have owned at least 8 chargers in the past, Maha's, Panasonic, etc. It is nice to see that this charger shows you the mAh on the LCD panel as the battery charges up. Most chargers you only see an LED indicator to signal when charging is done.
Compared to the specs of BC-900, the BC700 can only go up to 700mAH (the max) which means it is somewhat slower than the BC900. But the faster the battery charges, the hotter it gets. And one of the worst enemy of rechargeable batteries is heat. Less heat means longer life for the batteries.
Pros:
- 3 adjustable charging speeds
- Will show you the actual capacity in mAh. This is good so you know which battery needs to be refreshed. You always want to use batteries with the same capacities in pair or in a group.
- 4 independent charging stations with individual LED readouts. "AA's" and "AAA's" can be charged in different combinations. Don't you hate those gadgets that only use 3 batteries like portable radios? (walkie-talkies). You end up with 1 un-used battery if you bought a 4-pack. How will you charge it if your charger only charges in pairs?
- Reasonable price for an excellent charger
- Small and light. Better portability
- Multi-volt up to 240v. Very useful if you travel a lot to other countries.
Cons:
Now I have to stop myself doing impulse buying on NiMh's because I enjoy using this charger too much. La Crosse Technology BC-700 Alpha Power Battery Charger
Just in case you were looking for the La Crosse Technology BC-900 AlphaPower Battery Charger: please be advised that ths is NOT the same charger.
Except for the color, the BC700 looks exactly the same as the better-known BC900. However, it is actually a "handicapped" version of the old charger. Its charging current can only go up to 700mA in three steps (200/500/700). The BC900, on the other hand, can go up to 1000mA for 4 cells, or 1800mA for 2 cells. Also the BC900 package includes eight NiMH rechargeable cells (4 AA and 4 AAA), eight C/D cell adaptors, and a carrying case. The BC700 does not come with any bonus items.
This is not to say that the BC700 is a bad product. Quite the contrary, it is better than any other NiMH AA chargers in the market except for BC900 and Maha MH-C9000. If you can find it at a substantial saving (like maybe 30% off from the price of BC900), it is still a good buy. But as it is right now, I recommend getting its older brother instead.
[update on June 13, 2008]
Recently the price of BC700 has settled to a level much lower than that of BC900 (partially because the price of BC900 has gone up), so it is now an excellent buy - especially if you intend to buy some low-self-discharge NiMH cells separately. In light of this, the criticism in my original review now seems unnecessarily harsh. Too bad I'm not allowed to change the star-rating for this product.
[Update on April 7, 2010]
I hope my overly critical review above did not discourage anyone from buying the BC-700. As of this moment, it is the best value if you are looking for an advanced battery charger/analyzer. This is because:
- The BC-9009 has been recalled recently due to excessive overheating/meltdown incidents.
- The Powerex WizardOne Battery Charger-Analyzer is more powerful, but costs twice as much as the BC-700.
- The newest La Crosse BC500 has severely limited functions compared to the BC-700 (see my review for details), yet it costs more.
This is a great charger and when I bought it it was about $15 less than the BC-900. Now the BC-900 is less than this charger. The difference between this charger and the BC-900 is the lack of the faster charging speeds and the accessories. Definitley buy the BC-900 and the accessory package for less money. It seems they are constantly playing games with the pricing on these two chargers. The BC-700 charger does a great job of reconditioning batteries and the charging speed is usually between 2-3 hours for the different capacity batteries that I have. (1800mh - 2650mh). Time is not an issue for me as I have about 10 sets of AA's and can just keep swapping them out. From what i've read the slower charging speed is better for the life span of your battery any way.
AFTER careful consideration & making additional observations as well as in the interest of presenting a more equitable view of my recent experiences with La Crosse BC-700 AA/AAA battery chargers over the past month, here is my updated review. Much work has been done to be helpful. It is my hope that this examination of mine is supportive to persons considering purchasing this rather versatile charger. If this is too lengthy of a review & you don't have time for it all then please scroll to the Bottom Line at the end, thanks (sometimes we disabled veterans have too much time on our hands).
Initially, after purchasing & receiving 4 of these little chargers, the BC-700 had me nearly mesmerized, being the first reasonably decent "smart" battery chargers we'd ever owned. Once the novelty wore off though & after making many careful observations, a lot of things began to stand out that just didn`t make sense. For most of us, the BC-700 is a big step up from common "dumb" battery chargers we are all familiar with... but there are some limitations with these chargers that had we known about we would have never purchased them in the first place. No doubt these chargers will perform better than any simple AA/AAA battery chargers on the market, giving one far greater control & selection over the charging processes, offering several charging/discharging modes & generally protecting one`s investment in small, rechargeable batteries. Its default programming makes it quite simple as well as safe to use... but there are problems at present: problems with quality control, problems with the charger's operations & very annoying problems with customer service (as has been noted by other reviewers). Am hopeful that La Crosse will soon these address these problems & that this charger will evolve into a better one. First, the problems, then the better stuff...
QUALITY CONTROL:
* 1 of our 4 chargers has its compartment buttons quite uneven in their seating, curving & dipping this way & that, spoiling a nice, high-tech appearing charger.
* 2 of our 4 chargers have a most annoying, distracting piece of dust underneath the view plate right where the readings are taken for one of the compartments.
* 1 of our 4 chargers requires the Current/Display/Mode buttons to be mashed quite hard in order to get them to perform their functions.
* 3 of our 4 chargers are amazingly difficult to insert AA batteries into as well as removing out of the compartments (negative charging tabs are sticking out excessively).
OPERATIONS:
* One compartment will charge batteries a good amount more than the others three for some reason, even while charging evenly-matched, quality batteries that have been top-off charged only 10 days beforehand & then using "Test" mode to determine capacity. This is always compartment #3 or #4 for some reason, over a dozen tests having been performed to back up these observations. No matter the brand, no matter the type of rechargeable cell (5 different brands & types of batteries were tested), this strange phenomenon is observed consistently. In all fairness, this occurs while using the default 200 mA charging, so perhaps this current is not quite enough to trigger the 4th battery to fully charge up to end the charging cycle consistently. Better results are seen when programming the chargers to use 500 mA of current to charge 2000-2500 mAh rated AA batteries instead of the lower default current, as then the negative delta voltage cutoff seems to trigger in a more balanced fashion using higher current. 200 mA charging, though, appears to work just fine for AAA NiMH cells, both with standard cells as well as hybrid.
* Have had our remaining NiCADs (low capacity solar yard light batteries) reach over 1.7 volts & a couple hitting 1.83 volts while charging... on just 200 mA charging current, no less. Rather high for a 1.2 volt rated cell, is it not? This is being measured while charging them at 1/3rd of the cell's rated capacity (0.33C).
* There is a most annoying, consistent anomaly concerning the final trickle charging (the following figures are observed using new, broken-in/cycled, low self-discharging Sanyo eneloop AA & AAA hybrid NiMH batteries). As the first cell reaches "Full" charge it is then trickled between 17-19 mA until the next battery reads "Full". Then the first charged battery at once reads a 12-13 mA trickle charge as the last cell to read "Full" receives the 17-19 mA trickle. Same with the 3rd, same with the 4th, regardless of timing. Even if the trickle charging goes on for days, the first 3 to charge up will continue to show a 12-13 mA trickle charging & the last to charge will still show 17-19 mA! This is rather unusual, though it strikes me as being a bit bad for low self-discharging AAA hybrid cells (such as Sanyo eneloop batteries) to be receiving this slight overcharge over the course of days, as we have to do sometimes when we are away from home. Not a huge problem, granted, just a minor one.
* The AAA cells make a harsh grinding as they are inserted into the compartments due to the grooves in the positive charging tabs. The AA batteries don't do this, just the AAAs. It is a significant scraping. If the AAAs could be placed into the compartments positive side first then this wouldn't occur, though the design of the tabs will not presently permit this.
* When observing the charging current being displayed as the batteries are inserted while others are charging/discharging OR as they finalize their charging OR are removed while others are still charging, there is in all cases a significant "bump" upwards in the charging current for the remaining cells that takes over a minute & a half to settle back down to where they all were before. To me this clearly demonstrates no true independence of charging compartments, as does the final trickle charging anomaly.
CUSTOMER SERVICE:
* "The lack of" would be more appropriate, truly. At least, at present it is. After over 2 weeks of phone calls (just TRY & leave a message on their customer support line & see what happens) as well as numerous emails to La Crosse support, we finally received a phone call from someone (likely a salesman, not a technical person) who didn't know what he was talking about, even arguing with me that the BC-900 is the newer model than the BC-700, which it is not. Additionally, no support email was received back until the morning after my initial BC-700 review was posted late in the evening before. That finally got their attention, it would seem.
* The La Crosse employee who called also said that the trickle charging inconsistency "won't hurt anything". Respectfully, am disagreeing... particularly with the hybrid AAAs over a period of several days. We simply no longer have enough faith to leave the chargers operating while we are gone a day or two & not have a few mildly overcharged AAA batteries waiting for us when we return. You see, we also own a good number of solar AA/AAA battery chargers that split a mere 100 mA charging current 4 ways... 25 mA current charging per cell on a clear day. Our AAA batteries build full charges in them over a period of several days in full Sunshine on just 25 mA current each. While using standard NiMH batteries, which have a fast self-discharging rate, the trickle charging anomaly of the BC-700 is no problem whatsoever so far as can be discerned. However, with the low self-discharging NiMH hybrid cells we are using I beg to differ. We see a difference in what 2 AAA hybrid cells measure already that were left in 2 BC-0700 chargers trickling for days while we were out. There is a small but measured drop in performance of about 3% each for these 2 new AAA eneloop cells that trickled @ 18 mA for 2 extra days. The other 6 AAA batteries, 3 in each charger, actually gained capacity (trickling @ 12 mA), but the 2 at 18 mA each lost 3% capacity according to earlier logged values. A 10-12 mA trickle current for each AAA hybrid battery is just fine, though 18-19 mA over a period of days is too much in these types of cells in my opinion.
* Though the BC-900 has been out for quite a while now & the BC-700 for a fair amount of time, there is not so much as one item that is presently listed in their FAQ for either model charger as of the writing of this review. Now, that is simply difficult for me to understand (La Crosse product models of many various types & functions are individually selected once one is into their website's FAQ section). Am hopeful that this, too, will be remedied soon.
Am rating this charger 4 stars because it apparently DOES perform okay except for the aberrations & limitations noted. One star off for quality control, total charger operations & for lackluster customer support. 3.5 stars would be given if it were possible, but 3 stars as in my initial review now seems a bit too harsh. Sadly, we simply did not have in these chargers what we needed for the large investment we've made in over 5 dozen top-shelf Sanyo eneloop AA & AAA hybrid batteries. We regularly use them all too, so our chargers pretty much run 24/7/365. As we need more precision for our particular applications & goals, we have returned 3 of the 4 BC-700 chargers for the problems listed here in this review. We are keeping 1 of them & continue to put it through its paces with our standard NiMH batteries. Any relevant info we gain as a result will be passed on with an editing of this review. We have since purchased 2 Maha Powerex MH-C9000 chargers (because of our need for truly independent charging compartments as well as more precise options) & they are both performing splendidly thus far.
BOTTOM LINE: The various charging modes of the BC-700 chargers are a real plus, they look great overall, are apparently sturdy enough & will likely perform well for years to come. 500 mA of charging current seems to charge AA 2000-2500 mAh rated rechargeable cells in a much more balanced way than the default programming of 200 mA of current, so one would do well to consider using it for this application. As La Crosse never states that their charger's compartments are fully independent from each other, we do not have a complaint coming in this. If you require the utmost control over your AA/AAA battery charging process, have more options & precision as well as have the extra bucks to spend then consider getting the Maha Powerex MH-C9000 charger-analyzer. For most everyone's improved AA/AAA battery charging needs, the La Crosse BC-700 is a handy, versatile, compact & affordable battery charger that will likely serve you well.
* Edited to correct a grammatical errors * - Nimh - Battery Charger Aa Or Aaa - La Crosse - Rechargeable Batteries'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Ipad Accessory - stylus, ipad pen
Review Summary:
If you're really wanting a stylus for your iPad, I would recommend this one. Considering the limited number of iPad styli on the market, this one's pretty good but I do have a couple of critiques. It's definitely overpriced and could use a protective cap for the tip. Especially since the foam is likely to not hold up very well to sharp edges and rough textures. Despite being a bit shorter than a regular pen, it's comfortable to use/write with and has a decent weight to it (seems to be made from a semi-thick tube of aluminum). Due to Apple's iPad screen technology, you'll need to press a little bit on the stylus to ensure that there is enough surface area on the screen. My opinion: this will work for now but if you're wanting a really good writing device, keep an eye out for future iPad and styli developments.
Detailed Review:
Product arrived and looked exactly as I expected but also came with a short string that is hooked onto the top end of the stylus (see the photo I added to the product images). At the end of the string is a plastic piece that's meant to go into the audio jack. It fits nicely and is snug enough so it won't pop out. However and in my opinion, if you attach the stylus to your iPad the stylus is going to swing around like crazy. I'd only recommend using this if you have a notebook type case for your iPad or a sleeve that you're going to put it in. The incase sleeve for the iPad is roomy enough to accommodate this stylus without a problem.
The stylus is shorter than a normal pen (again, see my photo) but I've had no problem using it (I'm a 6' male with medium sized hands). Another reviewer gave low marks on the writing quality of the stylus and I'm not so sure that it should be given such a low mark because I don't believe that it is a design or product flaw. The iPad is made for fingers and I don't believe that Apple designed the iPad to be used with a stylus and for people to write on it with such a device. Therefore, I find the stylus to be adequate but the device's accommodation of a stylus to be inadequate. When writing on the iPad I do need to press a little so that there is a larger surface area in contact with the screen. If I lightly touch the stylus then the iPad doesn't pick it up. I've use this on two apps: iAnnotate and Penultimate. It works better than my finger but the iPad still isn't quite built to support handwriting (hopefully not yet).
The tip of the stylus is made from a foam. It's density is in between that of a dish sponge and hard styrofoam. My guess is that it'll hold up pretty well as long as the tip doesn't encounter much friction with rougher surfaces (like the pockets inside of my backpack). Having said this, I'm quite disappointed that the manufacturer didn't think to or decide to add a cap to protect the tip. For 21$ I'd like a bit more bang for my buck. This is about the only shortcoming that I find with this product.
I'm glad I bought this but I'm going to be on the lookout for better styli or possibly some bluetooth type stylus/device. BoxWave Capacitive iPad Stylus (Crimson Red)
I bought a Pogo Sketch to use with my iPad and at first I was elated. However, I used the pen quite a bit with the Penultimate app. In a few weeks the tip had flattened to the point that metal was starting to scrape the screen. I then ordred this Boxwave stylus and realized that I had been eating hamburger before when I could have had steak. The Capacitive Stylus tip is much harder and will last many months (years) longer than the Pogo. The harder tip also produces less friction so it is much smoother. I have a Zagg protective screen on my iPad is it works great with it. It is kinda expensive, but in the end you'll be glad that you spent the extra money. One thing that I hope they will change is the length of the attachment cable. It is made for an iPhone (and not an iPad). One end snaps into the headphone jack as an anchor. It it were longer, it would be of great use.
I bought a Pogo Stylus to use with my new iPhone as I have long nails and cannot "type" correctly on the phone. The Pogo Stylus is okay but the tip is flattening out quickly. Upon reading a review of the (ASIN:B000ETU944 BoxWave Apple iPad Capacitive Stylus] I decided to try it and I'm glad I did. I do not have to press down as much as I did with the other stylus and I love the quality and appearance of the BoxWave. Try it, I'm sure you'll like it too! Worth the extra cost.
Update: December 12, 2010
While I originally liked this stylus, I'm already on the second one and it has just broke. The rubber tip at the bottom does not stay on if you're using it regularly like I have. It will fall off and it's very hard to get back on. Once you have gotten it back, it will not stay in place for long. I have replaced the rubber tip just to have it fall off again without me knowing it. I've gone through two of these styluses and will not be purchasing another one. I have moved on and purchased the silver and black Pogo Sketch which hasn't given me any problems yet!
******************************************************************
I have gone through a few styluses and they've all just plain sucked! I have purchased the Pogo, Dagi and several others and they all haven't met my expectations. I wanted a really nice stylus to use with my iPad and I was about to give up and just stick with using my finger until I came across this Boxwave stylus in crimson red. I decided to give it one more go around and I'm happy to say that this capacitive stylus is awesome! It's a really nice stylus. It has a soft rubber round tip and the construction is durable. I don't have to press down on the screen because it's really responsive. All I have to do is tap lightly. So far this stylus has been the best so far with drawing and sketching. I was also able to write some notes in Penultimate without any issues. It also comes with a little attachment that you can use to attach it to your iPhone or iPod. I didn't see a place where I could attach it to the iPad. I also tested it on my Blackberry Storm 2 and works just fine. It's a little pricey but totally worth it! I highly recommend purchasing this stylus over all of the others. You won't regret it!!!!
This stylus deserves more than five stars!!!! - Ipad Pen - Touch Screen Stylus - Stylus - Ipad Accessory'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Ipad Accessory - stylus, ipad pen ipad accessory Ipad Accessory - stylus, ipad pen
Audio Visual Wall Mount - audio-video shelving, shelf
This was delivered in one day. Good Condition. Picture instructions easy to follow.
Wasn't a wood stud where it needed to be installed. I tried using supplied drywall anchors and screws. The plastic anchors messed up using an electric drill and screws were to large.
I had the common problem of creating a rounded out hole to big for the anchors.(stuff happens!) So,I checked my surplus hardware stash and found two metal drywall anchors with the spring loaded wing-nuts that lockup against the inside of the drywall. These are the best for any weight bearing install.
I didn't rate the shelf system 5 stars because of the supplied anchors & screws.
The shelf system was great and goodlooking. A very sturdy shelf holds the cable box and above on the next shelf is my blu-ray player. Adjusting the shelves was easy. I really liked being able to arrange all cables neatly through cableways on each side of the base and behind the shelf holders. This made a nice clean setup. Very pleased with the final results.
I experienced no instability in any of the shelves as I read in some review. This my be because of the use of the supplied anchoring hardware. Before install, go to the hardware store and get better hardware for the drywall. In my opinion, the metal wing-nut toggle bolt type are the best for load bearing shelving. AVF ES250B-T Wall Mounted AV Component Shelving System with 2 Adjustable Tempered Glass Shelves (Black)
I was looking for a cheap wall shelf unit, but I wish I would've shopped more. This unit is very visually pleasing; however, lacks stability. The drywall anchors that come with it don't work very well. I eventually made them work, but recommend getting other anchors if you have the choice. I got the anchors tight to the wall, but the shelves will sway side to side way more than I expect if bumped. The shelf looks very nice if you put it up away from contact, but I fear things may fall off them as wobbly as they are.
The main support track attaches with 2 screws right through the middle and once you get the shelves and components on them, they swing from side to side...a lot (I screwed straight into stud...not drywall using anchors). Also, I have an Onkyo reciever (a fairly heavy AV component) on the bottom shelf and the front sags down about 3 inches so its pitched forward pretty severely. I happen to have my DVR sitting on a very stable shelf below it and have cut a couple 3" spacers that I put under the 2 front corners of the shelf to prop it up. This is not ideal and if I had this free standing on a wall with nothing beneath so I could prop it up, it would be completely unacceptable. like I said, the reciever is on the heavy side but not absurdly so. I assume a lot of people considering this would want it to support their reciever (since that's a pretty major part of the system).
Also, my HD cable box/DVR made the shelf pitch forward as well and with the cable attaching at the back sticking out a little like it does, the box had to hang over the front edge (all 4 'feet' were on the shelf however). So if you have a box like this from Comcast or Charter, just be aware.
It does look great and if you plan to put it somewhere it would never get bumped and only put light components on it (PS3, DVD or Bluray player), it would probably work fine for you.
It's exactly what they promise... Simple wall mount shelf that fits cable box and media center perfectly. Also it gives you an ability to expand it with another one if needed. Until I found this item I was looking for a wooden shelf 12 inches wide and it proven to be more trouble then it was worth it. I totally recommend this item. It works, has good quality and sturdy. Also for $40 it's a steal :D
This shelf system looks really nice and is very sturdy. I installed it directly below my 46" LCD TV in my bedroom. The installation instructions are shown via pictures and not text, so if you have never put a hole in the wall to hang something up before, just be cautious. Take into consideration where the nearest electrical outlet is and also where the studs are. The shelving unit may not line up with the TV if you choose a stud due to the way the TV is mounted (typically between two studs). If you are not putting a lot of weight on it, there is nothing wrong with tapping directly into the drywall, because they provide you the necessary hardware to mount it either way. Prior to having this system, my cable receiver box was on the floor which looked terrible. Now, the receiver is on the shelf with a blu-ray player and the cables run directly below to the electrical outlet. I don't think there is a way to completely hide the cables, but it most certainly looks much better than previously. One more nice thing about this shelving unit is that it can be expanded by buying another which would yield four shelves if needed, so consider mounting the first one high enough in case expansion is ever needed.
Overall, this product looks good and functions like it was designed to. I have had it up for about a month and it is still in tact. - Home Theater Component Shelf - Shelf - Audio Visual Wall Mount - Audio-video Shelving'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Ipod Clock Radio - docking stations, alarm clock
I searched a long time for a combo clock radio and docking station for my iPhone. Although there are several on the market, I wanted something that took up as little space as possible on my night stand, had a display with large numbers, would charge my iPhone, play music from my iPhone as the alarm instead of the radio, and was easy to use.
I FOUND IT!! This Sony clock radio is great, and has TONS of features. I like the large illuminated display, which has different settings depending on how bright you want the light at night. Setting the alarm is very easy (you can go forward and backward through hour and minutes, without having to run completely through the cycle like most clocks), and there are TWO alarm settings. You can set an alarm for weekdays to get you up for work, and then a separate alarm for the weekend. Pretty cool.
The snooze button is nice and big on top of the unit, and let's you take the standard 10 minute snooze, or you can keep pressing the button and lengthen the snooze time up to 60 minutes in 20 minute increments. A nice feature.
There's a sleep feature timer so you can listen to radio or iPhone/iPod music while you fall asleep. For the alarm, you can have a buzz, AM or FM radio, or a tune from your iPhone, and it works great.
Buttons on the front and side are nice and large so you don't have to grope in the dark, and there are a variety of customizable settings.
The best part is the hidden slide-out docking tray. Pop it out when you want to charge your iPhone/iPod or listen to music through the clock's speaker, and push it back in when you don't need it, making the unit's footprint as small as possible. The docking tray comes with adapters to fit iPhone or iPod. I use mine without either adapter because I have a protective case on my iPhone, but it still fits in nicely.
In reading back my review, I sound like a Sony employee, but I'm not. Have no connection to the product, other than I'm a satisfied customer, and would recommend this unit highly to anyone looking for a docking station/clock radio for their iPhone or iPod. There are too many other features to go into here. Have fun discovering all the great things Sony thought of to include on this unit.
Thanks for a great unit, Sony! Sony ICF-C7IP Clock Radio for iPod and iPhone with Hidden Sliding Dock Tray
First off, I want to say that I like almost everything about this alarm clock and that I went to a Best Buy first and tested it (music and all) right next to its bigger Sony sibling (the one with the CD player, called Sony ICFCD3iP CD Clock Radio for iPod and iPhone) as well as the iHomes and Logitech and other competitors. Essentially this one came out the winner in every way IF what you're looking for is an ALARM CLOCK. This is not a speaker system by any stretch (it's not even stereophonic, one speaker), it's not designed to party to or have it produce massive bass sounds. I know this is obvious to most of you but there's always some imbecile who doesn't seem to realize that a little alarm clock barely bigger than your iPhone can't possibly be a stereo system.
As an alarm clock, I loved this little system precisely because it does so much and takes up so little space. The LED lights are not too bright when you go to the lowest setting, the sound is definitely loud enough for you to hear even if you're in the next room at high volume, the iPhone dock is easy to use and can be used with a case on your iPhone. It also looks good and it's nice that the dock cradle slides in, overall it looks A+.
Since I also compared this one in person to the Sony ICFCD3iP CD Clock Radio and tested them both simultaneously, I can offer you these observations if it's helpful to you. I ruled out the iHomes, by the way, because all systems that make you stick your iPhone on top like that are horrible looking, maybe that was cool in 2007 if you thought having an iPhone is cool and you want it brandished like it's a trophy, but that now looks tacky, dated and cluttered. This comparison is between this Sony product vs the one with the CD player:
--Size: I liked the CD player one more because I actually thought this one looks a bit too small. This is purely personal preference, if smaller is better for you then go for this one.
--Layout: I call this a draw. One thing that's better on the CD player one is that since it's bigger, there was room to put the tuner and the preset switches on the sides of the device rather than on the back which is not as convenient. You probably won't use these two switches much though so this probably doesn't matter much. One thing I liked better on this one is that hitting the snooze as you're groggy is pretty safe, but on the CD one, since the opening for the CD player is right in front of the snooze button, you can very well accidentally open the CD tray violently if you hit the snooze and aren't careful.
--Speaker, sound: Basically a draw for me. The Sony descriptions on Amazon, and indeed even on the boxes of the two products, tell you nothing about power. I had to look under the devices themselves (which got me bad looks from the salespeople) to find out that this alarm clock's speaker is rated at 10 watts. The CD player's speaker rated at 16 watts. Normally I'd say this means the CD player clock is better, but oddly at similar volumes in the store, I actually found this alarm clock's speaker to be better defined than the bigger one from the other Sony, and almost as loud. The bass was slightly better on the other one though. But since this is an ALARM CLOCK and not a speaker system by any stretch, I frankly didn't care either way, they're both plenty loud to wake up to music or the radio to and close enough in quality despite the different wattage.
--iPhone dock: here I expected them both to be the same, but I was surprised that the iPhone dock trays are not designed the same, and that this Sony's design of the tray was actually better than the CD player's. The CD player's tray hangs in the air, in that when it opens up there is space under. So when you put your iPhone in you kind of have to grab the tray or else the whole thing tilts, it's not a good setup. The tray that comes out of this clock, on the other hand, has the end of it flush with the clock's bottom and whatever table it's on. So it's much more secure and you can just dock your iPod on it with one hand and not worry about a thing. So the clear loser is the CD alarm, as this one is better designed. Both can fit an iPhone with the case on by the way, just don't use the tray inserts that come with this.
--LED illumination: here too this Sony beats out the CD Sony. Both clocks have three light settings. I put them side by side and tested them both. The upshot is that the bigger one has much brighter LED lights. When I compared both at the lowest setting, the bigger clock was still pretty bright and would be annoying in the dark (unless you're scared of monsters at night and want a night light). At its lowest setting, this Sony here was still just a bit brighter than I would have liked, but not nearly as annoying as the CD player's light. This is a big reason why you see good reviews of this Sony here while the CD player's reviews are generally bad with lots of complaints about the light level.
I did buy this alarm clock and all in all, I really wanted to love it, but over the past two weeks it has infuriated me with one BIG design flaw that is making me return it because it is fatal. It simply can't reliably stay tuned to a radio station so as to wake you up to it.
Now if you don't care at all about waking up to radio, consider this a 5-star review and move on. But I like to wake up to NPR, a strong FM station in my area. I've had an 9-year-old CD player alarm clock beside me before this Sony, and not once did it fail to wake me up to a strong NPR signal when the alarm was set. This brand new Sony, on the other hand, comes in and out! You can test it before going to sleep and the sound is 100% clear, and yet when it comes on in the morning it sounds like it is barely tuned to the station unless you play with the ugly and unsightly antenna cable that sticks out of the back of it. Even if you didn't touch that unsightly cable all night.
Even WORSE, when it comes on like that in the morning, if it is not receiving the FM station well, you don't even get static noise (which at least would still wake you up), you get nothing but a very faint buzzing that doesn't wake anyone up! I've already been late to work three times on account of this clock's failure to maintain a lock on a station. I've even tried testing the position of the ugly antenna before going to bed and having the volume very high, yet still for no apparent reason at all it sometimes fails to lock on in the morning and you sleep peacefully to 8:30 am to a very low audio buzzing sound that seems to lull you into an even deeper sleep.
The culprit is that Sony really cheaped out on the FM receiver.
How they can make such a colossal design flaw on a product that costs more than competitors like iHome that are larger and with better speakers is inexplicable. I really wanted to love this, but it's an ALARM CLOCK and if it simply loses connection to a station in the morning despite the ugly antenna cable and can't wake you up, what good is it? Shame on Sony for having such a design flaw by cheaping out on internal components. Whoever was in charge of approving that is incompetent and should be fired because he doesn't understand retail products, this is not a $20 alarm clock on which you can use cheap transistors to save 50 cents. This is an alarm clock aimed at a slightly higher market and there is an expectation that at the very least it can be reliably counted on to wake us up in the morning.
REVISED REVIEW FROM HERE ON OUT
I am revising my review, going from two to four stars, because as time as gone by the radio reception seems to have improved (but only after careful placement of the antenna cord and making sure it's never moved), and I decided that all the positives and the lack of a good competitor warrants better than two stars. It's still the most compact, efficient and best looking alarm clock out there... I just wish they used better components for the radio receiver. - Alarm Clock - Ipod Dock System - Docking Stations - Clock Radio'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Photography Accessories - travel, accessories
Anyone who owns a compact camera should own a Pocket Xshot. The features of the Pocket Xshot are already listed in Amazon's blurb so here are a few things they forgot to mention. First, this thing really works! You don't need a mirror to place yourself in the shot, just look in the lens. My husband, father-in-law, and 12 year old daughter all took well centered photos after one or two attempts.
There are two groves, one on each side, of the telescoping metal of the Pocket Xshot. The groves serve to keep the device stable and prevent your camera from turning upside down as you get ready for your shot. My brother's camera extender did not perform as well.
The Pocket Xshot is so small it fits easily in my purse attached to my camera. It is so light weight anyone can hold the camera upright for as long as it takes to get the perfect shot.
The best thing about the Pocket Xshot is that it keeps unwanted people out of your photos. Stand in front of your chosen background and extend your camera on the Xshot. Pedestrian traffic will naturally flow around you and your camera. The Pocket Xshot eliminates the need to wait forever or ask people to stand back while you get the perfect shot.
Since receiving my Pocket Xshot, I have ordered two more as gifts. You know the people who are never in the picture because they are always taking the picture? There seems to be one in every family. The ones in my family will be losing their excuse very soon. I unreservedly give this product five stars. XShot Pocket Telescopic Camera Extender
First day I got it I could not wait to put it on my new GoPro...I guess I pulled on it a little too hard because it came apart in the middle.It was hard to get back together but I did.(now I know better)Now it works great. So,...go easy.
I bought this mainly to use with my Go Pro HD Hero action cam. This thing was made for that camera!!! I have put other compacts on it with great results. Quite sturdy, fairly well made for something that is roughly $20!! High over crowd shots, hanging over ledge shots, self portraits. Just use your imagination and you will think of a few more. Mine goes everywhere the camera goes. It's small enough to carry anywhere. A couple of friends liked mine so much they are now proud owners. I use it more than you might think. Buy it!
The bottom cap of the Xshot came off easily. I was a bit suspicious when the package I received the Xshot seemed to open easily (ie, could have been a returned item), so I don't know if it was a faulty one or if this is typical of the construction quality, but it is a potential hazard for your camera to then put the Xshot on a tripod based on this faulty end cap. While I had the Xshot on the tripod, the Xshot fell off (with the end cap stayed on the tripod) and the Xshot (camera and all) fell to the ground. Fortunately, it fell on soft carpet, so there was no damage to the camera. Anyway, am in process of trying to return it to Semsons (which I bought through Amazon).
I was very excited with this item arrived but immediately dissappointed when I tried to screw it into the base of my Canon camera and the bolt wouldn't go in. After several attempts, I went and got my other two tripods and they screwed in without any hassle. I compared the threads on the different tripods and noticed the XShot had a significantly steeper thread pitch than my other tripods. I'm surprised others haven't experienced a similary issue and am saddened I have to return it because otherwise it is a well made product.
This gets great shots on the go, great quality part, a must have part of my camera bag now!
Be prepared to explain what you are doing everywhere you use it, it will get you weird looks, but the pictures come out great if you are out and about and don't want to give strangers your camera!
If you are traveling abroad, this little device is a must have. Sure, you can ask some other tourist to snap a photo of you and your travel companion(s) while standing in front of the Eiffel Tower. But what if no one else is around?
I kept this thing in my back pocket at all times while my wife and I traveled in Europe. I attached my camera, extended the device, set the timer, and held the Telescopic Camera Extender, while my wife composed the shot on the camera's LCD screen. We got some excellent results. And we got many thumbs up and smiles from other travelers.
This item was made for the GoPro camera! But it will work well for any small pocket camera that has either a delay shutter or remote shutter option. I can see using this to get shots where I want some height such as above heads in a crowd or where I cannot stand such as out a window. While it is not a high end quality item, it is well worth the inexpensive price. I can see using this handy item many times!
I chose this over the Quickpod due to comments related to the camera rolling over with the Quickpod extender.
The packaging is a little cheap. Takes a bit of an effort to extend which is ok. I just hope it doesn't loosen over time to where it starts to slide shut. The telescopic shaft is notched to avoid the camera from rolling over on it side which I thought was a nice touch. It is sturdy when held in the hand. The plastic parts on the extender looked a little cheap and the finishing on them wasn't that great. But they do the job. It is light and very compact when closed. It also has a lanyard.
Taking pictures is much better than the good old extending the arm method. But you do have to get the tilt right otherwise you'll be taking shots a little high or low. But with practice I am sure the shots will improve.
Overall, a very decent product that will put itself to good use. - Travel - Photography - Xshot - Accessories'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Knife Sharpeners
This sharpener does a good job and, while not the over $300 professional quality, it is excellent for the everyday chef. Great price and did very well with my knives in developing a nice edge. Use the fine section of the sharpener for keeping your knives very sharp. Rarely will you use the coarse part. It's not necessary unless you cut concrete!
This was chosen because of other reviews. I agree with the determination that this is a fine product. I immediately sharpened an older and dull butcher knife. It required about 10 draws through the course and 4 through the fine to put an extremely sharp edge on the knife. Great results for a good price!
Great price for how well it works. If you don't have practice using a steel, then this is a great alternative. Like other reviews, use the fine slot for every day honing. You should check your knife before every use. It doesn't take long and you'll keep it sharper longer. You shouldn't use a knife that isn't sharp. It isn't safe. The sharpener doesn't put a professional edge on your knife, but it does put a consistently even one. This helps the edge last longer. The handle is comfortable and the bottom is made from silicon/rubber that keeps it from sliding. The only reason I gave it 4 stars is because I would prefer the angle of the sharpening slot to be at a full 90 degrees. It doesn't take any getting used to, however. That's just my preference.
Wow! I sharpened two knives that were my husband's before we were married (about 25 years old). They had been abused and never were sharpened unless he used his tool sharpener. Several passes restored the blade and even the tip was so sharp that I cut my finger accidentally. Great product and I'll purchase as a gift for my sister's cabin (knives there are awful). I don't think you'll be disappointed if you purchase this.
I bought this thinking it would be a good knife sharpener. It is not. After just three knives the carbide inserts were already not working as well. As another reviewer mentioned the ceramic portion started turning and did not do its job correctly. I would not waste money on this item.
When we first got our Wusthof knives, I could slice paper with them; but after several years of use, not so much. This well made little kitchen gadget changed all of that. By the time I had finished with this little gem, every knife in our block would slice paper again. I am extremely happy with this purchase.
This sharpened my Wustoff carving knife really well. It is super easy to use - just put the blade into the slot, pull firmly towards you, pull knife out and repeat.
There are 2 sharpening slots - the primary one, and another softer one that gives a polished, clean sharpening. For smaller jobs, you can just used the second.
My knife was getting quite dull, and after using this, i could run the blade across a piece of paper and it cut beautifully. After one day of heavy food prep, though, the knife needed re-sharpening. This is my only complaint. It is possible we need to sharpen the blade more, but we had run it through the sharpener a number of times so it should have lasted.
Also - the handle is nice, so you can easily keep this in place with one hand while you sharpen.'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Simple Digital Camera - simple digital camera, great value
I was worried when I first took this camera out of the "hang me up on the wall like I'm a camera to give to your 2-year old" packaging. My second worry was that it was so light. I honestly bought it for the sheer purpose of having a backup camera on my vacation trip. Well, to my pleasant surprise, it takes some great pictures. I thought I'd have the same issue I do with my current Polaroid camera that's about $60 more than this one, of the pictures coming out dark with or without flash. This camera works nicely indoors and out, although outdoors come out more crisp. I've had some blurry photos, but I think those were due to user error more than the camera itself.
If you're looking for a cute camera for your kid going to college, or even a backup one for yourself to keep in your purse/bag, I do recommend this one. If you're comparing it with the other cameras that are in the same price range, I would check out the mega-pixels those have compared to this one.
Comes with your basics, but no memory (you have to get a memory card). Polaroid 5.0MP Digital Camera - Green (CAA-540GC)
I bought this for my 9 y/o daughter after her first "kiddie" camera broke. I did not want to waste the money on another cheap kiddie camera that takes horrible pictures and has no real features other than the cartoon character on the case and the "fun" photo editing software that come with it(what is the point when they do not take a decent picture?). After browsing, I found this little gem. It takes great pictures and has many of the same functions and features as a more expensive camera, including a wide viewing screen, zoom capabilities, video w/sound, several flash settings and it even has settings for action or sports pictures. It has more features, but really I am a point and click kind of picture taker. No it's not professional photography equipment, but I think this would be a great purchase for anyone who would like a camera on hand that takes nice pictures. I would also reccomend this to any parent who feels they have a reasonably responsible child who might be too old for the vtech type cameras, but still not old enogh for a more expensive model. It cost about 30 dollars more than the cameras marketed towards young children and tweens, but it is worth it seeing my daughter able to actually enjoy her picture taking experiences. I am not 100% sure about the durability of this in the hands of my daughter, it is very light and slim, but I think any adult would find it acceptable and it does come wih a silicone skin and so far it has held up well. The only drawback, if you can even call it one, is that it does not come with a wrist strap. All in a GREAT buy and highly reccomended.
I purchased this camera for my 12-year-old daughter as a replacement. This camera is actually the "new" version of the model she had prior to this one. It is very light which usually means very cheap. It performed no where near what her first Polaroid did. The camera is in perfect shape, but we decided to buy a Kodak for Christmas since this one took awful pictures and videos.
I bought this for my daughter for Christmas (2010). She really wanted a digital camera, but I wasn't sure if it was a passing fad with her or not. I bought this because she wanted, 1) a green camera, and 2) the price was decent.
I expected more from a 5.0MP camera than this thing delivers. I have a Canon Sure Shot from several years ago that is only a 2MP camera. It takes much better quality pictures than this new one does. The pictures tend to be grainy. The other thing I noticed was that you have to have an extremely steady hand to take a picture with this camera - otherwise it is blurry.
She'll get used to it and it will serve it's purpose. The body of the camera is fine - it arrived on time and in perfect condition. I like the fact that the camera OS allows for larger memory capacity (8GB SD card, I believe) - my Canon can only take a 2GB card.
One very small point, there is a lanyard loop on the body of the camera. Every small camera I have ever purchased came with a wrist strap lanyard. This one did not come with that??? I have looked high and low to try to find one in Target and Walmart. I guess they're going away too.
I bought this as a Christmas gift for my son-he is 6. He LOVES this camera! I looked for weeks for an affordable but nice camera for him. The kid cameras were either too "kiddy" or didn't have the best reviews (like picture quality). I was impressed with the deal on this camera-I didn't want to spend too much for a camera for a 6 year old but this was perfect. Rechargeable batteries, a charger, and the camera-wow! And I got it way before the expected arrival date! The only down side to this item is that it does record video but there is no volume and it didn't come with a owners manual-no big deal for me though-this camera MADE my son one happy little boy!! Not to mention that his favorite color is green! Wonderful gift!!
One Pleased Mom - Great Value - Simple Digital Camera - Digital Camera For Kids'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
simple digital camera Simple Digital Camera - simple digital camera, great value
Directions - streets and trips, cartography
This remains an outstanding trip planning and GPS program. Unfortunately, some of the map details are still not as good as were found in the 2004 version of this program. I can't understand why MS would dumb down their product. Also, the street names seem to have been dumbed down as well. For example, Golden Eagle Ferry Road has been reduced to Ferry Road. There are innumerable examples of this dumbing down and simplifying which only serves to confuse.
Despite the dumbing down of the actual map data the program remains a superb mapping program with many updates since the 2004 and 2005 versions. New streets, restaurants and other points of interest are now incorporated. This program offers a truly affordable GPS guidance system for nearly all consumers without having to go to the expensive Garmin or Magellan systems. If you find yourself traveling to points unknown I cannot imagine a better more affordable solution for getting around than this product in conjunction with your notebook computer. Even if you have an "all in one" solution such as the Garmin Nuvi Streets and Trips can help you plan your trip and routs. I have both and they compliment one another very well.
A few comments about the Streets and Trips mapping software. I am familiar with the Delorme product and the Garmin product and Streets and Trips blows them both away - no contest. Instantaneous panning, zooming in and zooming out, outstanding routing software, and a plethora of other features makes Streets and Trips, by far, my favorite mapping software.
I heartily recommend this product! The updated mapping details and new points of interest are also useful. Microsoft Streets and Trips 2007 [OLD VERSION]
Microsoft provides users with the fastest, sleekest consumer map software with Streets and Trips. As such, I have been a fan of Streets and Trips since the 2002 version. Unfortunately, Streets and Trips is merely a slight improvement over its predecessor, Streets and Trips 2006, and still has most of the key problems.
There is no question there are several benefits to Streets and Trips over online "free" applications with their invasive advertising, sluggishness and reliance on an Internet connection. Resident map data addresses all of these annoyances and gives the user more control. Putting that particular debate aside, Streets and Trips 2007 does suffer from a lack of connectivity in its inability to update core grid data and point-of-interest data over the Internet.
As I mentioned in my review of S&T 2006, Google Earth is setting the stage in the consumer map world. While Satellite photos do little for trip planning, Google does a nice job of locally caching large amounts of data from a remote server. The Streets and Trips development team must do the inverse of this. Most of the data should be resident on the local computer with dynamic integration from a variety of remote sources.
Dynamic updates can serve many purposes. The most straightforward is correcting inaccurate road information and updating core data as new roads are constructed. Secondly, there is a great deal of POI (point of interest) data that could be updated continuously. Lastly, if Microsoft promoted a comprehensive ecosystem, various government and private entities could provide plug-ins for Streets and Trips. At the current time, this ecosystem does not exist.
The lack of real-time connectivity leads to other shortcomings. In essence, Streets and Trips creates static maps. This precludes the implementation of real-time traffic or weather. Sadly, Microsoft has lost out on so many other value-added features that are provided by Google Earth, Yahoo Maps, and the Weather Channel online.
Oddly, key problems in its management of basic street data persist. For example, it can't properly interpret hyphenated street addresses in the boroughs of New York. Of course, it is impossible for a single user to error check the entire database, so I am curious what other errors exist.
Like most map programs, Streets and Trips is automobile-centric. This means that it interprets one-way streets literally. While great for drivers, it doesn't help for walking. Moreover, there is no interpretation of public transit systems where users would walk to a subway or train stop, board, and walk to a destination.
Shortcomings aside, Streets and Trips 2007 is still a very useful consumer mapping tool. After you become accustom to the application, you will find yourself using it for the most mundane trips. It is very fast and easy to use - perfect last-minute errand planning. In the larger context, however, Microsoft does need to update its Streets and Trips business model to provide users with the same features they have grown accustom to with web-based applications. Only then with Microsoft have a killer app.
Pros
Fast
Ease of use
Exceptional clarity in maps and interface
No advertisements
First connectivity steps with Windows Live
Cons
Can't properly interpret hyphenated addresses
No export of point-of-interest data
No integration with 3rd party data
No real-time traffic
Won't print to larger formats (can't print to legal or tabloid)
Not enough control during printing (fonts and streets)
Not fully integrated with Office applications
First of all, I like the product. It works reliably - and that's more than you can say about some other MS products.
Picky points:
1. To use the GPS navigator, you must click one more time - to agree that you will not sue MS if you screw up your driving. Yeah, yeah. Well, once would have been quite sufficient.
2. Construction updates: Huh? Completely useless. Example - in California, heading on Hwy 89 from Lassen to Mt. Shasta, the road has been under serious construction (new bridges, etc) for years. Yet, nothing is noted when the latest construction info is downloaded.
3. Distances to turns are usually correct. However, on I-15 in Utah, the exit numbers are 3 or 4 miles too far north. I can understand this on smaller roads, but on I-15?
4. Off-route: the program should be a little more reasonable. I'm on the road around the rim of Crater Lake, and for whatever reason (probably a bad fix from the GPS), my track appears to veer off into space, and a voice warns me, "Off route". Huh? Hey, I'm on the only road....
5. Once in a while the program directs you to roads that existed, but no longer are correct. You must carry an up-to-date atlas and check your planned route.
6. No indication is given for road surfaces. Sometimes the program will direct you to roads that are gravel. That might be okay for you, but I'm pulling a trailer, and I don't go well on gravel.
7. The program shows you your elevation, but in tiny type. No provision is made for increasing the size. Another point - it would be really handy to have the program show you an elevation profile of your planned route.
Some terrific things:
1. Your actual speed is shown in big numbers. Very good - my truck has extra-large tires, and my speedometer reads 12% BELOW the real speed. Good way to get a ticket.
2. Map orientation is selectable. Wonderful.
3. Painless integration with the GPS unit. Plug it in, away you go.
4. It's surprisingly quick to note that you're off route. It's strange when you pull into a rest stop, and the program advises you that you're off route, but it's REALLY useful when you make a wrong turn in the city - got 50 feet and you'll get warned. This is very useful so that you can make a quick correction at the next block.
One funny thing: the program is prone to give you completely useless intructions: "in 14.3 miles, continue straight" Ha ha. But then when you come to a confusing intersection, no comment. Oh, well.
Summary: for about $100 including the GPS unit, this product is very, very, good. I've used it to plan my routes and find places for 10,000 miles, and it's been a faithful companion - not perfect, but a pretty good navigator. - Gps - Maps - Streets And Trips - Cartography'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Directions - streets and trips, cartography streets and trips Directions - streets and trips, cartography
Computer Accessories - caselogic, laptop
This is an excellent case for my HP notebook, which is slightly over 17 inches. My 'puter was securely snug, with plenty of padding, as well as overlapping velcro-fastened swaddling. There are plenty of spaces for folders, notes, CD's, power cords and all the trappings that our busy, modern-day life requires. The shoulder strap distributes the weight evenly, so even though my computer is heavy it's very easy to transport.
I'm very satisfied with this case, and I heartily recommend it. Case Logic TNC-218 18-Inch Laptop Briefcase (Black)
I recently purchased this item because of my HP HDX 18t Laptop, and although its a good product, I had to replace it with a backpack (also from caselogic). There's nothing really wrong with this case--its sturdy and is built well; my laptop fits well inside, it with a little more room to spare for accessories and stuff. But the HDX 18(as well as its accessories) is a heavy mother and it hurts my neck and shoulder if I carry it for more than ten minutes. But the backpack spreads the weight much more efficiently. So unless you have a lightweight 17" or 18" laptop with little accessories to carry around I'd say go for. It has clean lines and looks nice and "appropriate" if your wearing a business suit, but . . . you get the picture.
I purchased this case from another vendor in mid-September. The construction on mine is poor. I use it only to carry from the house to my garaged car and then into work, perhaps twice a week. After merely 2 months, the material is already pulling away from the seam on the laptop side. There is not much room for anything other than the laptop, it's power unit and cords, and a notebook mouse. The pictures on Amazon are deceiving because the laptop side does NOT open all the way; there is an expander that only allows it open about eight inches or so. So inserting or removing the laptop is a pain in the rear. I wouldn't recommend this to anyone.
This laptop case is very basic, but simple is usually better IMO. It fits my HP HDX18t Premium Series Notebook (18") just fine.
There were only 2 downsides. First, the side pocket doesn't really have too much room for more than a few CDs, thumb drives or thin external drive. They would have done better to put an actual pocket that could hold the power cord (with converter), travel mouse and any misc compact cords. (I guess they wanted to keep the bulk down.) The other problem is that the compartment for the computer itself doesn't open all the way. It is more like a "V" shape. I think they did this so there was less issue with the flap opening up and dumping your laptop (like a briefcase style), but it makes it a little awkward to get it in and out. Seriously, a 18" laptop takes a lot more finger strength to take out when you can't open flap all the way than a 15".
On the upside, I didn't want to pay a lot and this was the cheaper of all the cases I found that was self-contained (padded - rather than just a neoprene sleeve). I also won't be traveling too much with it, but when I do need to move it, it will be well protected. It also comes with a side strap that helps due to the weight and size of the laptop. It also has a cross panel on the back of the bag so you slide it down on a handle of a rolling suitcase and it will stay in place. That feature alone is pretty slick if you ever need it.
Recently ordered the Caselogic TNC-218. Really like the laptop case for my 18 inch laptop. Could not beat the price of $55.44 from LuggagePoint which included shipping. Got the case in less than a week. Excellent!!!
Purchased a 17.5" laptop for my 12 year daughter. Needed something that was easily accessible for a young person. Lots of pockets for gadgets and the insert inside the case holds the laptop snug. Very happy with my purchase. - Caselogic - 18 Inch Laptop Bag - Laptop Bag - Laptop'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Crank Radio - weather alert radio, solar radio
The features of this radio made it sound like it would be a good thing to have handy in case of an emergency, particularly the ability to recharge a cell phone from it. But I was very disappointed to learn that this radio was made so poorly, and so many things were wrong with it that I'm having to send it back for a refund. The backlight for the display did not work. The alert button would not operate. I could run it on crank power but the button to switch to battery power would not operate. I could get AM stations only (not even static on FM or shortwave) and it would not stay on a single station for long. The instructions were minimal. The overall design is poor. It's made of cheap plastic and everything feels like it might break if you bumped it. I won't be buying another one of these, that's for sure. Etón American Red Cross ARCFR360R Solarlink Self-Powered Digital AM/FM/NOAA Radio with Solar Power, Flashlight and Cell Phone Charger (Red)
I don't know what may have been wrong with the other reviewers products, but this radio works great and I couldn't be happier with its construction or what is designed to do. I made sure the rechargeable batteries were plugged in before I ran the hand crank and I have been listening to it while I have been typing this review. Works great and I can't wait to use it for camping and for my emergency preparedness kit.
I bought this about 6 months ago and i really like it. Some people apparently expect this radio to work miracles. I mainly bought the radio as something to take with me when i'm fishing. I thought initially some of the knobs seemed sort of cheap, but they get clanked around in my fishing bag and i don't see them breaking. The crank knob seems a little cheap and the rivets on it hurt your fingers after cranking for a while. You get about 15 minutes of decent volumed radio for 1 minute of straight cranking(and you can listen while you crank).
The battery life isn't super long but we're talking three AAAs here, so you shouldn't really be expecting much.
A decent sunshine will charge the battery or play the radio at a decent volume. The more sunshine, the more power.
Other reviews whined about reception. Well, i was fishing in a storm 4 1/2 hours away from my local AM station and that station came in crystal clear, it was unbelievable. Although the distance was due to the storm, that shows you the distance this radio is capable of. I have had absolutely no tuning problems, especially with AM which is what i normally listen to.
I can't speak to HDMI, cell phone charger, or audio in jack; but i like everything else on the radio. My only major gripe is that they should charge you 5 extra bucks and give you an adapter instead of forcing you to order it. Idealy, i'd like to have batteries for back up and be able to charge my radio in the wall for recreational use. I also don't think the digital screen is necessary, which is why the Eton FR300 might be better. Even with that said, for my 50 bucks i have been pretty happy with the product so far.
I am sorry that I didnt read the reviews before I bought this piece of junk. This thing goes through batteries so fast that I cant keep up with it. I've had better service with a $10 transistor radio. If you like to crank your arm off then buy one. In case of an emergency they'll find your body with your hand wrapped around the crank handle because you probably used up your batteries in about 1 hour.
I have had mine for 2 days. I live in a metropolitan area and the radio reception is fine for strong signals, maybe a little weak for some others. The sleep button was tricky at first, I have learned to put my finger to the left of the button and slide to the right; this way the button works fine every time. Pushing straight down didn't work, usually. Also I've noticed that if I let the alarm run out (an hour or two, I didn't notice), the time of day seemed to reset to 0:01. Other than those things, I am really loving this little companion. It's my new car radio since my car didn't come with one. (I don't leave it in the car, it would get too hot in the summer or too cold in the winter.) I love the sleep and alarm, and I especially love the solar charging. I am running it on solar / dynamo only. I don't think it's cheap plastic at all, seems sturdy and well-made to me. fyi 10 hours sunlight for a full charge, but I started mine with 90 seconds dynamo cranking, and put it in the sun now and then, it's working great. The cell phone charge option: instructions say that if you don't turn at the correct cranking speed you could damage your phone. I think that might be important information for someone out there. I would definitely recommend this product and intend to get a few as presents.
The only way the solar cell can charge the battery is with the radio outside in sunlight, not on a window sill. But the radio isn't built for leaving it outside in the rain and weather, so the battery won't stay charged. There are no presets for radio stations, and it's tiring to dial manually to get to your favorite station.
Using the crank to charge the battery sorta works, for a while. After about 60 seconds, your arm gives up. If you do succeed in charging the battery, the radio will eat up whatever charge you have in the rechargable battery (or the 3 AAA drycell batteries) in much less than an hour of use.
Just about any cheap radio on the market will work better and more reliably for emergency use, and cost much, much less. If nothing else, you can always use your car radio for emergency information.
I'm surprised the american red cross would put their name on this piece of junk. Having this radio around will give you a false sense of security if you think it'll work when you need it. - Crank Radio - Shortwave - Solar Radio - Weather Alert Radio'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Hard Drive Case - sata, external hard drive
The reason I bought this case is to build my own "super fast" eSATA drive. I also bought an eSATA 3.0gb drive as well as a PCI-E card. I have tried many compbinations but I cannot get the drive work in 3.0gb mode. The only way to make it work is to jumper the hdd to 1.5gb. So, if you have a HDD drive and a PCI card that are 3.0Gb compatible, this enclosure will limit your drive's speed to 1.5Gb. It is a really nice enclosure, made with professional grade materials, but if you are looking for the top speed this one will not cut it. Vantec NexStar 3 NST-360SU-BK 3.5-Inch SATA to USB 2.0 and eSATA External Hard Drive Enclosure (Onyx Black)
I bought a NexStar enclosure early last month to use a 250GB Seagate SATA internal HD I'd mistakenly bought last year when looking for the older IDE sort. Until finding reference to SATA ensclosures with USB 2.0 attachments, I thought I only had the option of putting the SATA drive in my G-5.
The enclosure went together quickly (including connecting a separate light cable) and the SATA HD using just the USB cable popped onto the screen to be initialized just like an IDE drive. Though it can be inferred from the product description that this NexStar enclosure will work with USB connections at the slower USB 2.0 speed, I'll just make it clear that this product comes with a SATA cable that allows faster SATA data rates in the case of you having such a SATA port in your computer--but if not, the enclosure will allow you to operate a SATA HD with the USB connection alone. Very handy--as it allows you to replace SATA drives from a a Apple G-5 and install the old one in the SATA enclosure to make use of the data. Nice way to upgrade and still use the old HD.
Haven't run the enclosure long enough to comment on heat issues. I'm inclined to run external HD's for a limited time as they are needed for back-up, so any heat build up would likely be avoided if it is an issue at all. The NexStar appears to be made of sheet metal and is not nearly as robust as Acomdata's aluminum brick enclosure--but Acomdata doesn't seem to offer a SATA to USB enclosure.
I was looking for an Enclosure with eSATA and USB that could handle a 2 Terabyte internal drive. This works so far. I haven't tested the eSata. I put a Hitachi Deskstar 2TB SATA HD32000 IDK/7k drive in it and it works fine. You do have to use the disk management program in Windows to first initialize it and then format it. I chose simple volume which is the most common format type if you don't need RAID. The specs said it goes up to 1.5 TB so I wasn't sure it could do 2TB in one partition but it seems fine. I like the no fan to break and slim design. If I load more than about 30GB at a time I give it a rest to cool down a little just in case. But, it only seems a little warm not bad. It wasn't plug and play though. You do need to take those two steps to get the computer to see it as an external drive. Was able to get the Hitachi 2TB drive for $108 on sale. So, a pretty cheap combo external drive setup. Good luck.
As of 4/28/11, Vantec says only Version 1.02 will support 3TB drives. This is indicated on the outside of the box next to the barcode and not on the unit itself. Not sure if Amazon can check what version they have in stock. Also, it depends on the OS on whether the enclosure will support 2TB or 3TB. Windows 7 & Vista will support 3TB on the eSATA and the USB. XP will only support 2TB for both the eSATA and USB.
This is an excellent product, with a first-class design, both in its operation and in its classy appearance. It has a very small footprint in the vertical position. I have it sitting on a 1/2 inch styrofoam pad, which I do as a matter of course with drives of this sort in order to lessen any vibration effects. However, there are none at all; it is impossible, either by sound or feel, to detect that the drive is running.
It was very easy to install a 500gb Seagate Barracuda SATA drive, which of course required formatting before use. After formatting, the drive worked as expected, with no fussing or fiddling. Most important, the fan-less aluminum enclosure runs very cool. The warmest surface temperature which I measure using a laser spot thermometer (in an ambient surrounding of 75 degrees F) is 95 degrees F.
All pros and no cons!!
I bought this enclosure for my 400GB SATA drive and it fits great and works great. Nice sleek, glossy design makes it stand out !! the installation is soo easy and the user manual is well documentated for 1st timers.
it doesnt make any noise (well depends on ur HDD), the enclosure does a good job in dissipating the heat out, so no need for a fan !!
One minor improvement is I wish there is some kinda clip which joins the casing and the front silver opening through which the HDD is fitted inside. So, when we fittign is done, we have to push the silver side towards the enclosure, which needs some pressure and there could be a tiny gap if enough pressure is not applied.
Overall, great product.. Highly recommended. - External Hard Drive - Drive Enclosures - Hard Drive Case - Sata'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Organization - brother, labeler
I got this shipment within it's estimated delivery date, and it is very easy to use and very convenient! I used this to label some of our bottles on the spice rack - the letters are very clearly printed out (with the small font, you can actually print out two lines of text), and the entire process was very simple, I didn't even need a manual to figure out how to do basic printing of labels (I don't even remember if it has a small booklet for the manual). The label itself holds well.
The device is very compact, lightweight (like a kid's toy), yet doesn't look like it's easy to break. It has a custom frame that you can change anytime you want, although I don't really care about these colorful plates as much. Vendor should've included a refill label cartridge instead. :)
I recommend this product for those who just want a basic labeling tool with preprogrammed patterns for small art projects and such. This item doesn't have too much to offer, but it works for a simple person with simple needs. I'm pretty pleased with it! Brother Personal Labeler Machine, White (PT90)
Pros: inexpensive gadget,works great, clean lines, not too big, takes 4 AAA batteries, has cool styles like shadows and bold, has cute symbos
Cons: expensive labeling refills, writing is very small, uses too much extra tape at the ends. labels very hard to unpeel unless you have long talons (nails)
I am a very organized person so I got this at Staples for $15 at staples (on sale) and so far it works great. I have been labeling like a madwoman since I got it. I have labeled all my electronics chargers, my pet food/misc. items, my tv/dvd cords, my plastic drawers, and my electronics so far and I haven't even had this labeler for a day! My biggest complaint is that the writing is a big small unless you supersize it. It was pretty easy to figure out, but I did have to skim the manual first. I wouldn't use this one for my business, but it's great around the house.
This label maker has a ton of cool functions. However, after 1 short use, it had almost used it's whole battery life. I wish there was a power cord that came with it so that the batteries wouldn't die after ever use.
Works great. Little waste and cute styles. The only thing I don't like is you have to keep the paper within reach because there are so many functions. I would buy it again in a second. Very happy =)
The PT90 is so easy to use. I literally got it out of the box, popped in the batteries and started labeling. I have orgnized every bin, drawer and cubbie in my house, garage and attic on the same set of batteries and it is still going strong. I love the special features that allow you to embelish the label with patterns, it makes a tedious job a little more fun. Happy labeling!
I bought this labeler a few weeks ago, and although I wouldn't exactly call it the most compact thing I've ever held, it functions well and has plenty of label options. Instructions were easy to understand, and I was printing my first labels within 5 minutes of unboxing it, even without really going through the instructions. I won't go into too much more detail on the functions, since they are pretty standard.
About the infamous battery warning:
Some previous reviews have commented about this machine (and other similar P-touch models) being a total battery black hole. Here's my experience:
Just ignore the Low Battery! warning and keep on printing.
I'm not even using traditional alkalines --- I have 4 AAA rechargeable NiMH batteries in there. (Sanyo Eneloop brand -- check them out! They are fantastic.) So far, I have printed at least 3 dozen labels, on and off, over the past few weeks. This includes printing 10 or so labels at a time, without turning the machine off in between and leaving it on for a few minutes between actual printing. I have to admit that it flashed Low Battery! at me after the VERY FIRST label. I just pressed a button and kept on going. It hasn't shut off on its own or refused to print a label yet. Long story short, do not be discouraged by the warning. I can't comment on performance with alkalines since I haven't tried them, but at least with NiMH, it's fine. The first set of batteries for me is still going strong. If you're truly worried about battery life, consider investing in some rechargeable batteries. Newer "precharged" NiMH type batteries are not the old rechargeables of 20-30 years ago, work well, and are ready to go even after sitting in a box, unused, for a year.
So, that's the scoop so far on the battery situation. Hope that's helpful for anyone looking to take the plunge on one of these.
This is a simple device, and I think that a simple review should suffice.
Packaging - nothing you wouldn't expect, packaged simply and shipped on time.
Power - Operates on 4 AAA. There is a lack of a power adapter with this device. However, if only using to print a few labels every so often, then the batteries will hold a charge for a long period of time.
Printing - Many more options than you will probably ever need for printing labels (also different colored label cartridges available). We labled an entire Earth Station satellite system using the simple setting of one line, basic text and numbers, and it worked flawlessly.
Price - For the price, this is a decent label printer, and I assume 95% of the people using label printers will need nothing more than this, simply type, print, cut, and stick it on. Brother is also a respected name brand (also known for printers), so do not fret if you haven't heard of anything else made by Brother. - Label Makers - Brother - Labeler - Organization'
Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)